Sentences with phrase «mean income over»

Leveraging 3 houses could mean income over $ 135,000 for Samantha, whereas buying the one house in cash may only result in just over $ 50,000 in income.

Not exact matches

Nest will install one million of its thermostats, meant to save on energy usage and costs, in low - and moderate - income households over the next five years.

The CEO of the Washington - based firm made jaws drop when he announced that, over the next couple of years, all of his employees would be brought up to the $ 70k mark — a change that would mean doubling the income of his lowest - paid employees.

I've tried online poker as a means in the past, and which I learned A) was not passive income but hard work and B) I have an addictive personality which resulted in me losing the 4g I earned in 6 weeks over the span of 72 hours so that's out of the picture.

But the Tar Heel State is higher in our rankings thanks to a higher median household income, which means residents have a bigger percentage of their paychecks left over after expenses.

This would mean not only disproportionate tax reductions for the upper - income group that has seen its incomes rise most rapidly over the past generation.

Our focus was on arithmetic mean (average) household incomes by quintile (and the top 5 %) over the 50 - year history of this data series.

If you calculate that additional benefit over a 30 year time period ($ 300 multiplied by 30 years) then waiting would mean $ 90,000 in additional retirement income.

An advantage of the 401k over a Roth IRA is that your contributions are tax deferred which means your taxable income is reduced by every dollar that's paid into the 401k.

Such tight spreads mean that even a small selloff can wipe out credit's extra income over government bonds.

To sum up, the consistency of the Dividend Aristocrats means that these stocks are likely to generate more income over time even if you contribute no additional funds to your investment portfolio — which is Do Nothing investing at its finest.

The expansion of household debt has meant that the debt - servicing ratio — the ratio of interest payments to disposable income — has increased further over the past year (Graph 29).

This is a HUGE negative for residents in coastal cities like New York and San Francisco where property tax alone can be $ 18,000 a year based on the median home price of $ 1.5 M. Further, a taxable income of over $ 400,000 means a state income tax amount of over $ 26,000.

As is the case when you enroll in an income - driven repayment plan, the problem with extending your repayment term is that spreading out your payments over a longer period of time means you may end up paying a lot more in interest (see table below).

On Monday, the Finance Minister tabled a Ways and Means Motion to implement a reduction in the personal income tax rate from 22 % to 20.5 % for those earning between $ 45,282 and $ 90,563 and to increase the rate to 33 % for taxpayers earning over $ 200,000.

The fixed - income duration remained flat at just over two years, meaning that this portion of the portfolio should have little sensitivity to interest - rate movement.

As for what the above means for portfolios, investors may want to consider sticking with a few key themes: a preference for stocks over bonds, a healthy allocation to international equities given that U.S. stocks do look relatively expensive, and an opportunistic stance in fixed income.

Despite spending over # 70million on central defenders Nicolás Otamendi and Eliaquim Managala in recent years, neither has been overly impressive, and the fact that the defence has been ripped apart with alarming regularity by the likes of Leicester, Tottenham, Stoke, Liverpool (twice) and, in the weekend just gone, Southampton has meant that improving the backline has become a major priority for the incoming manager.

Traditionally most clubs» biggest source of revenue has been domestic TV rights which bring in over # 5 billion but Arsenal, Chelsea, Liverpool, the two Manchester clubs and Tottenham Hotspur — the so - called «big six» — believe their greater appeal means they deserve more of the international income.

I immediately thought back to my days of grumbling over college meal offerings — thinking that at some level, my feelings of not wanting to eat bagels at every meal were valid, and also feeling like, hey, if not offering artisanal cheese and waffles imprinted with the college seal means providing more talented, low - income students financial aid, then of course, do the latter!

and by implications, have the Democrats take over the three levers of government which will mean NYC and Downstate firmly in the driver's seat, making Illinois look competent in comparison, hiking income taxes to levels never before seen, and basically screw Upstate New York over.

A citizen can not claim means - tested benefits without proving habitual residence, they can not marry a non-EEA national without verifying the partnership's legitimacy in the eyes of the state, and they can not bring this spouse into the UK without earning over a minimum income threshold.

It is worth noting that while people under age 65 in the U.S. live in a heavily market - dominated economy where poor employment outcomes mean poverty and a lack of access to health care, almost everyone over age 65 has most of their healthcare paid for by Medicare, (a FICA tax financed, single payer system that pays providers more or less the same rates as private insurance companies and has few cost controls), more than half of their nursing home costs paid by Medicaid, (which is stingy in how much it pays providers and moderately means tested), and receives enough of a guaranteed income from the combination of Social Security and SSI payments to keep the poverty rate for people age 65 +, (even if they have no retirement savings of their own), above the poverty line, regardless of the state of the local economy.

Incomes change over time, so this does not necessarily mean New York was $ 37 billion worse off at the end of the period than it would have been if no moves had occurred during this period.

This means that, the newly trained Andrew posted teacher could presumably afford to buy 20 bags of cement with all his disposable income then, but today can afford 36 bags of these same cement and over 40 bags if it's not Ghacem brand.

- GDP per capita is still lower than it was before the recession - Earnings and household incomes are far lower in real terms than they were in 2010 - Five million people earn less than the Living Wage - George Osborne has failed to balance the Budget by 2015, meaning 40 % of the work must be done in the next parliament - Absolute poverty increased by 300,000 between 2010/11 and 2012/13 - Almost two - thirds of poor children fail to achieve the basics of five GCSEs including English and maths - Children eligible for free school meals remain far less likely to be school - ready than their peers - Childcare affordability and availability means many parents struggle to return to work - Poor children are less likely to be taught by the best teachers - The education system is currently going through widespread reform and the full effects will not be seen for some time - Long - term youth unemployment of over 12 months is nearly double pre-recession levels at around 200,000 - Pay of young people took a severe hit over the recession and is yet to recover - The number of students from state schools and disadvantaged backgrounds going to Russell Group universities has flatlined for a decade

That this House declines to give a Second Reading to the Welfare Benefits Up - rating Bill because it fails to address the reasons why the cost of benefits is exceeding the Government's plans; notes that the Resolution Foundation has calculated that 68 per cent of households affected by these measures are in work and that figures from the Institute for Fiscal Studies show that all the measures announced in the Autumn Statement, including those in the Bill, will mean a single - earner family with children on average will be # 534 worse off by 2015; further notes that the Bill does not include anything to remedy the deficiencies in the Government's work programme or the slipped timetable for universal credit; believes that a comprehensive plan to reduce the benefits bill must include measures to create economic growth and help the 129,400 adults over the age of 25 out of work for 24 months or more, but that the Bill does not do so; further believes that the Bill should introduce a compulsory jobs guarantee, which would give long - term unemployed adults a job they would have to take up or lose benefits, funded by limiting tax relief on pension contributions for people earning over # 150,000 to 20 per cent; and further believes that the proposals in the Bill are unfair when the additional rate of income tax is being reduced, which will result in those earning over a million pounds per year receiving an average tax cut of over # 100,000 a year.

Do you think George Osborne should or should not abolish the current 50p top rate of income tax on those earning over # 150,000, meaning the top rate would be 40p?

Conservative sources said that his words meant that, in government, he would go ahead with the new 45p rate of tax on incomes over # 150,000 a year, which Alistair Darling announced in November, to start from April 2011.

The Tories have been on the defensive over their multi-millionaire deputy chairman after he admitted earlier this month that he is a non-dom — a status which means that he does not pay UK tax on his overseas income.

But in April 2010 Labour's «additional rate» came into force, meaning anyone earning more than # 150,000 a year had to pay 50p in every pound of income over that amount.

Upon dissolution or winding up of said corporation's affairs, whether voluntary or involuntary, all of its assets then remaining in the hands of the board of directors shall, after paying or making provision for payment of all of said corporation's liabilities, be distributed, transferred, conveyed, delivered, and paid over only to educational, scientific, literary, or charitable organizations that are exempt from federal income tax under section 501 (c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, and which are not private foundations within the meaning of section 509 (a) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, on whatever terms and conditions and in whatever amounts the board of directors may determine, for use exclusively for educational, scientific, literary, or charitable purposes, except that no distribution shall be made to organizations testing for public safety.

This steady exodus means that low - income students are routinely taught by inexperienced teachers, that students experience the disruption and loss caused by teacher turnover, and that schools do not increase their instructional capacity over time.

In that regard, it is obvious that a family whose total annual income is between $ 10 - 20k will be very unlikely to pay over $ 11,000 a year for center - based care (the mean price paid by families making more than $ 150k a year).

In 2014, parents of students at Horace Mann Elementary School in Northwest Washington, D.C., spent over $ 470,000 of their own money to support the school's programs.1 With just under 290 students enrolled for the 2013 - 14 school year, this means that, in addition to public funding, Horace Mann spent about an extra $ 1,600 for each student.2 Those dollars — equivalent to 9 percent of the District of Columbia's average per - pupil spending3 — paid for new art and music teachers and classroom aides to allow for small group instruction.4 During the same school year, the parent - teacher association, or PTA, raised another $ 100,000 in parent donations and collected over $ 200,000 in membership dues, which it used for similar initiatives in future years.5 Not surprisingly, Horace Mann is one of the most affluent schools in the city, with only 6 percent of students coming from low - income families.6

As LAUSD is preparing to refine its next budget, CLASS is demanding that $ 1 billion in extra state funding over the next seven years go to help the students it was meant to serve — low - income students, English learners and foster youth.

Keep in mind the marginal tax rate that year was «35 % on the income over $ 336,550,» which means Polis made out like a bandit, most likely because he was largely paying capital gains tax rates instead of the rates on ordinary income (caveat lector: I'm not an accountant.

Over half of the state's unfilled teacher positions are in bilingual and Special Education, meaning English learners and students with special needs are less likely to have the supports they need, especially if they live in under - resourced districts with more low - income students or more students of color.

The program was also designed to extend help to students from a wider range of incomes — in 2011 - 2012, over a quarter of Pell Grant funding went to students from families making over $ 40,000 — and it was meant to become the country's primary grant aid program.

Bill Siart, GPSN's chairman, said the track record that some schools have had over the last decade in improving outcomes for students in low - income neighborhoods means that replicating success is now possible in a way that wasn't before.

The United States has grown more residentially segregated by income over the last four decades (Reardon & Bischoff, 2011), meaning that schools have, in many places, become increasingly segregated by income as well.

You can leave your phone in a backpack or purse and while driving and accept an incoming call hands - free, meaning the sound of the call comes to you over the vehicle's audio system.

However, I definitely prefer this indie approach as it means I have had 18 months of income as well as over 40,000 people reading the books and I have build up an email list of fans who will be ready to buy the next book when it is released — whether self

Within credit we prefer up - in - quality exposures and favor the U.S. over Europe, where richer valuations mean lower income potential and higher sensitivity to interest rates.

When a majority of the income for high earning taxpayers comes from wages, the «ordinary,» i.e. higher, income tax rates come into play, which means that compensation and other «ordinary» income over certain levels is subject to the highest federal tax rate of 39.6 percent in 2017.

This means the company is generating enough net income to cover its annual interest expense almost eight times over.

Its 40:60 rate means if repayments on a new loan push total debt repayments over 40 % of income, then it is deemed too expensive.

If your disposable income over 5 years is less than 25 % of this calculation, you have passed the means step and can file under a Chapter 7 Bankruptcy.

This means if one makes a large charitable contribution but doesn't have income of at least double that amount, they can use their spouse's income in determining their deductible amount — meaning they save current taxes instead of having the contribution carried over to the next year.

Similarly, while the new system is income tested, those income thresholds are also not indexed, meaning that over time more families will see their benefits decline and fewer will receive any benefit at all