Sentences with phrase «mean less injuries»

Since better safety ratings mean less injuries in the event of an accident, these vehicles get preferred insurance rates.

Early passing would mean less injuries, and higher completion rates for passes that matter.

1) No impact — which means less injuries 2) Improves posture by strengthening muscles in the balanced way 3) Increases metabolism (not just for two hours after class) which help you bern fat when you're not exercising 4) Burns fat not muscle — only a weights based method will help you build and tone muscle so you maintain your metabolism and help you maintain your results.

Not exact matches

The softer impact means less trauma to the head, and the theory is that this will reduce the likelihood of brain injuries or concussions.

Still less does being ethical mean never permitting any agency to bring injury to anyone; for not permitting this might be possible — owing to the division of power — only at the cost of greater injury through interference with other powers.

Still less do they mean that men could be «cured» of their religious beliefs by proving them false, as men might possibly be cured of drug addiction by lectures about the injury it does to them.

I think drones are the way to go 1) cheaper 2) Cuts down on the loss of servicemen 3) less injuries to servicemen mean less cost to the taxpayer 4) The enemy can't say «we're occupying» their territory 5) Instant response 6) keep enemy off guard Last but not least 7) THEY WORK!

I mean there is less than 1 % chance of all the players being fit together as long as wenger is there - he just can not seem to fix it... so if wenger stays, we should consider the injury scenario as a given and plan our transfers - alas even that does not happen.

That will mean he is less prone to injury and gets less downtime.

When I said about Wenger having the say on players fitness I meant that the medical team do their job, but Wenger more or less lets the players decide whether their fit enough, when he should be ultra cautious given our track record with injuries.

well, maybe number wise as his injury will mean one less body in the squad....

This is an incredibly difficult question to answer for a variety of reasons, most importantly because over the years our once vaunted «beautiful» style of play has become a shadow of it's former self, only to be replaced by a less than stellar «plug and play» mentality where players play out of position and adjustments / substitutions are rarely forthcoming before the 75th minute... if you look at our current players, very few would make sense in the traditional Wengerian system... at present, we don't have the personnel to move the ball quickly from deep - lying position, efficient one touch midfielders that can make the necessary through balls or the disciplined and pacey forwards to stretch defences into wide positions, without the aid of the backs coming up into the final 3rd, so that we can attack the defensive lanes in the same clinical fashion we did years ago... on this current squad, we have only 1 central defender on staf, Mustafi, who seems to have any prowess in the offensive zone or who can even pass two zones through so that we can advance play quickly out of our own end (I have seen some inklings that suggest Holding might have some offensive qualities but too early to tell)... unfortunately Mustafi has a tendency to get himself in trouble when he gets overly aggressive on the ball... from our backs out wide, we've seen pace from the likes of Bellerin and Gibbs and the spirited albeit offensively stunted play of Monreal, but none of these players possess the skill - set required in the offensive zone for the new Wenger scheme which requires deft touches, timely runs to the baseline and consistent crossing, especially when Giroud was playing and his ratio of scored goals per clear chances was relatively low (better last year though)... obviously I like Bellerin's future prospects, as you can't teach pace, but I do worry that he regressed last season, which was obvious to Wenger because there was no way he would have used Ox as the right side wing - back so often knowing that Barcelona could come calling in the off - season, if he thought otherwise... as for our midfielders, not a single one, minus the more confident Xhaka I watched played for the Swiss national team a couple years ago, who truly makes sense under the traditional Wenger model... Ramsey holds onto the ball too long, gives the ball away cheaply far too often and abandons his defensive responsibilities on a regular basis (doesn't score enough recently to justify): that being said, I've always thought he does possess a little something special, unfortunately he thinks so too... Xhaka is a little too slow to ever boss the midfield and he tends to telegraph his one true strength, his long ball play: although I must admit he did get a bit better during some points in the latter part of last season... it always made me wonder why whenever he played with Coq Wenger always seemed to play Francis in a more advanced role on the pitch... as for Coq, he is way too reckless at the wrong times and has exhibited little offensive prowess yet finds himself in and around the box far too often... let's face it Wenger was ready to throw him in the trash heap when injuries forced him to use Francis and then he had the nerve to act like this was all part of a bigger Wenger constructed plan... he like Ramsey, Xhaka and Elneny don't offer the skills necessary to satisfy the quick transitory nature of our old offensive scheme or the stout defensive mindset needed to protect the defensive zone so that our offensive players can remain aggressive in the final third... on the front end, we have Ozil, a player of immense skill but stunted by his physical demeanor that tends to offend, the fact that he's been played out of position far too many times since arriving and that the players in front of him, minus Sanchez, make little to no sense considering what he has to offer (especially Giroud); just think about the quick counter-attack offence in Real or the space and protection he receives in the German National team's midfield, where teams couldn't afford to focus too heavily on one individual... this player was a passing «specialist» long before he arrived in North London, so only an arrogant or ignorant individual would try to reinvent the wheel and / or not surround such a talent with the necessary components... in regards to Ox, Walcott and Welbeck, although they all possess serious talents I see them in large part as headless chickens who are on the injury table too much, lack the necessary first - touch and / or lack the finishing flair to warrant their inclusion in a regular starting eleven; I would say that, of the 3, Ox showed the most upside once we went to a back 3, but even he became a bit too consumed by his pending contract talks before the season ended and that concerned me a bit... if I had to choose one of those 3 players to stay on it would be Ox due to his potential as a plausible alternative to Bellerin in that wing - back position should we continue to use that formation... in Sanchez, we get one of the most committed skill players we've seen on this squad for some years but that could all change soon, if it hasn't already of course... strangely enough, even he doesn't make sense given the constructs of the original Wenger offensive model because he holds onto the ball too long and he will give the ball up a little too often in the offensive zone... a fact that is largely forgotten due to his infectious energy and the fact that the numbers he has achieved seem to justify the means... finally, and in many ways most crucially, Giroud, there is nothing about this team or the offensive system that Wenger has traditionally employed that would even suggest such a player would make sense as a starter... too slow, too inefficient and way too easily dispossessed... once again, I think he has some special skills and, at times, has showed some world - class qualities but he's lack of mobility is an albatross around the necks of our offence... so when you ask who would be our best starting 11, I don't have a clue because of the 5 or 6 players that truly deserve a place in this side, 1 just arrived, 3 aren't under contract beyond 2018 and the other was just sold to Juve... man, this is theraputic because following this team is like an addiction to heroin without the benefits

He was firing as CF and I prefer him up front because he runs less up front then on the wing which means less tiring and lower chances of injury.

Sorry, but I think you need to change your pair of eyes cuz if you meant what you said then you must be blind (unless you're joking) we need to take one game at a time and if we have less injuries and maintain the spirit, the confidence, and the» attack together and defend together no matter what».

Arsene Wenger is known to be a fan of the former United youngster, but even he must have concerns over his ability to stay fit, as well as the fact that all his injuries means he is less likely to meet his previous potential.

An almost unbelievable three injuries in less than half an hour to Kevin McNaughton, David Wheater and then the boy wonder Zach Clough meant we had been decimated by half time.

The muscles are forced to work with more efficient motions, which means less energy use and a reduced risk of injury.

Unlike David Cameron and Gordon Brown, with whom it's possible to refer, en passant, to Bullingdon Club shenanigans, or a rugby injury, or a manse, and for nearly everyone to know what that might mean, all most people knew about Clegg (if they could name the leader of the Liberal Democrats at all) was perhaps that he had some European connections, though they weren't sure what, and maybe that he once told Piers Morgan he'd had 30 lovers (in fact, asked by Morgan whether he had slept with 30 women, Clegg replied: «It's a lot less than that» — not that that got in the way of a good story.)

Governor Cuomo adds insult to injury by leaking this information on the same day he proposed a Tier VI for the pension system that would mean the lowest paid employees in public employment would have to pay more, work longer and receive less benefit.

Poor form reduces the effectiveness of any exercise (increases momentum, brings secondary muscles into play, etc.) and inevitably leads to injury and injury means less gains.

As well as increasing the risk of injury, this also cheats the movement by creating momentum that makes the lifting portion easier, and cheating means less gains.

There's no question that playing sports is an essential part of many kids» experience growing up, but the competitive nature of it combined with parents getting overly invested in their child's success can lead to injuries and burnout — meaning they're less likely to be interested in physical activity later in life.

Training with heavy weights leads to a stronger body that's less susceptible to injury, which means taking on daily activities that require any form of lifting get easier.

When you use your core stabilizers and other muscles throughout your body, not only do you get a bigger testosterone boost from the workout, you also lose more fat, gain a more even distribution of muscle throughout the body, which means better posture, less injuries and a better more attractive appearance.

1: you wear out faster, meaning you can manage less time on the water, and 2: your movements become sloppy, leading to injury and frustration.

Better recovery between workouts means less of a chance for injuries.

When muscles are at a less optimal length, it means decreased mobility, altered movement patterns and potential for injury.

This actually leads to a less stable spine, meaning a greater chance of injury - the exact opposite effect from what we want.

In the frontal test, one star means a 46 percent or greater chance of serious injury, and a five - star rating means 10 percent or less, NHTSA said.

According to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, a five - star rating in a side impact means a 5 percent or less chance of serious injury.

The intrusion into the vehicle chamber can not be avoided from hard side impacts but should not lead to serious injuries to the driver and passenger which means the vehicle side is structurally sound when less damage to the dummies are recorded.

The actual amount will reportedly depend on the veteran's age and injury; the average lump - sum award is currently $ 43,000, according to Veterans Affairs, meaning most will get far less than the maximum amount.

This means that you are unable to work and earn money because of an illness or injury that is expected to result in death or has lasted for a continuous period of not less than 60 months or can be expected to last for a continuous period of not less than 60 months.

Less time in jail for defendants also means less chance the officers will have to deal with the possibility of injury or health problems that can occur on their watcLess time in jail for defendants also means less chance the officers will have to deal with the possibility of injury or health problems that can occur on their watcless chance the officers will have to deal with the possibility of injury or health problems that can occur on their watches.

This means that if you are injured, you can only recover damages if it is determined that your fault in causing the injury is 49 percent or less.

When you retain Bailey & Galyen, you are telling the insurance companies that you mean business and will not be intimidated by them, nor will you take anything less than fair and just compensation for your injuries.

So just because the accident victim had a pre-existing injury — in this case a bulging disc — it does not mean that the victim can not recover even if the same accident might have caused less or no harm to someone without that preexisting injury.

Doing so does not mean they do not have a personal injury claim or that their claim is now worth less.

Just because it's hard to put a value on this type of injury does not mean it is any less real or harmful.

This does not mean that these injuries are any less harmful or any less important.

However, just because these injuries are difficult to value in terms of money doesn't mean they are any less painful.

However, this does not mean that these injuries are any less harmful to you.

Simply stated, this doctrine essentially means that any injured parties involved in an accident can recover compensation but can only be rewarded if it is determined that his or her fault causing the accident or injury is 49 % or less.

But the approval of claims of a more tenuous nature than the civil standard also means there is less money in the pool for other workers who do have a clear scientific or evidentiary claim for their injury being related to their job.

Settling with another driver's insurance after a collision and without speaking to a personal injury lawyer may mean that you receive less than you are entitled and may prevent you from making an underinsured motorist claim later.

An «uninsured motor vehicle,» as described in subdivision (3) of this subsection, includes an «underinsured highway vehicle,» which means a highway vehicle with respect to the ownership, maintenance, or use of which, the sum of the limits of liability under all bodily injury liability bonds and insurance policies applicable at the time of the accident is less than the applicable limits of underinsured motorist coverage for the vehicle involved in the accident and insured under the owner's policy.

This means each driver must buy enough car insurance to cover $ 25,000 in personal injury protection, $ 50,000 in per - accident insurance to cover other individuals injured in the accident, and no less than $ 20,000 insurance to cover property damage.

This means that a driver must carry no less than $ 25,000 in coverage against personal injury (also known as Personal Injury Protection or PIP insurance), along with $ 50,000 in coverage for injuries to others, and $ 25,000 in coverage against property damage.

Just because your net worth is less than zero, does not mean that someone will not come after you with a major liability claim in the aftermath of an injury accident at your Cape Coral home.

The subject of the injury matters far less than the meaning and significance of the event to the injured partner.