Sentences with phrase «mean less reason»

No, Nintendo would be stupid to make them for Wii Woo as it would mean less reason to get a Switch.

Some think that cheaper books mean less reason to pirate books and that's true to a certain extent, but used e-books also mean that authors and publishers will no longer be able to prove that an online copy has been stolen.

Not exact matches

There were several reasons for the upgrade, but the two big ones were aggressive share repurchases and a continued diversification of revenues sources, meaning less focus on traditional advertising.

Risk is one reason there's such emphasis on investing when you're young — young people have a long time horizon before retirement, which means they can worry less about short - term volatility.

In their 2010 third - quarter report, the company cites poor weather as a reason for slightly lower sales — a lack of rain last summer meant less beer in the fall and winter.

And thanks on the compliments — luckily this is a link building blog, meaning the main reason I did this is to act as a link building case study and less of a monetization project.

If one wireless carrier was buying another wireless carrier, and that meant there were less choices, that would be a clear reason to block it.

The death penalty should be abolished not for religious reasons (also religious people seem to approve of the dath penalty — which to me makes no sense) but because every person who is killed is one less set of DNA to be passed on to succeeding generations, and who knows what those wasted genes could mean for the future of the species?

Celibacy does mean that a priest can be more easily moved around, and no doubt it does cost the Church a lot less money, but it is not entered into for these purely pragmatic reasons.

Until the recent past the main emphasis has been on apologetics, catechesis and other reasoned approaches, but there are complementary steps to be taken towards the expressive and inspirational by featuring less rational and doctrinal means, such assacred art, that can in their distinct manner explore the way of beauty.1

Perhaps it even meant a less sophisticated view in the sense that reason did not dare to deal with the sacred power.

Such comparisons also mean that globalization pressures, which affect Western democracies more or less equally, can not be invoked as the sole reason for America's failure to help children thrive.

The only other reason I can think of is that she is intentionally being deceptive because she knows that the typical On Faith reader (secular, liberal, atheistic) isn't going to know any better, much less care whether she is accurately conveying Jesus» meaning.

We see no reason to abandon this theory if the hypothesis is not rigidly or arrogantly employed; if we remember that often it is impossible to untangle the «sources»; if we recognize that there is artistic, even theological, meaning in the way in which the sources have been combined; and if we recall that what we choose to designate as a single source may itself be the product of multiple lesser «sources.»

Reason would dictate more meaning is better than less meaning otherwise a frog and man have the same meaning.

The correct question we should ask ourselves is, why do we believe there is a God and when I say we, I mean the general population that does believe, it is also a good question to ask, why do those who do not believe in God, not believe, is their reason for not believing in God any more or less logical then the reason for those who do believe in God.

I like my trail mix cold — that's right, I store it in the fridge, for some reason I end up eating it slower — which means I eat less of it so it lasts longer -LCB- sneaky I know;)-RCB- 2.

There are numerous reasons for this, including increased manufacturing costs, special training for staff, limited production times, expensive ingredients, complex ingredients, specialised storage to avoid cross contamination and the smaller quantities needed meaning less economies of scale.

They aren't as worried about a looming arbitration payday as the Rays are, which means the only reason either player's name would come up is because they're not doing well... which makes them less valuable... which means it makes more sense to hold onto them.

I too like Navarro better than the others only because of his ties to the area, which means less of a reason to move the team (and frankly less of a reason for people to even speak about the idea of possibly moving the team, which drives me up the wall).

This is an incredibly difficult question to answer for a variety of reasons, most importantly because over the years our once vaunted «beautiful» style of play has become a shadow of it's former self, only to be replaced by a less than stellar «plug and play» mentality where players play out of position and adjustments / substitutions are rarely forthcoming before the 75th minute... if you look at our current players, very few would make sense in the traditional Wengerian system... at present, we don't have the personnel to move the ball quickly from deep - lying position, efficient one touch midfielders that can make the necessary through balls or the disciplined and pacey forwards to stretch defences into wide positions, without the aid of the backs coming up into the final 3rd, so that we can attack the defensive lanes in the same clinical fashion we did years ago... on this current squad, we have only 1 central defender on staf, Mustafi, who seems to have any prowess in the offensive zone or who can even pass two zones through so that we can advance play quickly out of our own end (I have seen some inklings that suggest Holding might have some offensive qualities but too early to tell)... unfortunately Mustafi has a tendency to get himself in trouble when he gets overly aggressive on the ball... from our backs out wide, we've seen pace from the likes of Bellerin and Gibbs and the spirited albeit offensively stunted play of Monreal, but none of these players possess the skill - set required in the offensive zone for the new Wenger scheme which requires deft touches, timely runs to the baseline and consistent crossing, especially when Giroud was playing and his ratio of scored goals per clear chances was relatively low (better last year though)... obviously I like Bellerin's future prospects, as you can't teach pace, but I do worry that he regressed last season, which was obvious to Wenger because there was no way he would have used Ox as the right side wing - back so often knowing that Barcelona could come calling in the off - season, if he thought otherwise... as for our midfielders, not a single one, minus the more confident Xhaka I watched played for the Swiss national team a couple years ago, who truly makes sense under the traditional Wenger model... Ramsey holds onto the ball too long, gives the ball away cheaply far too often and abandons his defensive responsibilities on a regular basis (doesn't score enough recently to justify): that being said, I've always thought he does possess a little something special, unfortunately he thinks so too... Xhaka is a little too slow to ever boss the midfield and he tends to telegraph his one true strength, his long ball play: although I must admit he did get a bit better during some points in the latter part of last season... it always made me wonder why whenever he played with Coq Wenger always seemed to play Francis in a more advanced role on the pitch... as for Coq, he is way too reckless at the wrong times and has exhibited little offensive prowess yet finds himself in and around the box far too often... let's face it Wenger was ready to throw him in the trash heap when injuries forced him to use Francis and then he had the nerve to act like this was all part of a bigger Wenger constructed plan... he like Ramsey, Xhaka and Elneny don't offer the skills necessary to satisfy the quick transitory nature of our old offensive scheme or the stout defensive mindset needed to protect the defensive zone so that our offensive players can remain aggressive in the final third... on the front end, we have Ozil, a player of immense skill but stunted by his physical demeanor that tends to offend, the fact that he's been played out of position far too many times since arriving and that the players in front of him, minus Sanchez, make little to no sense considering what he has to offer (especially Giroud); just think about the quick counter-attack offence in Real or the space and protection he receives in the German National team's midfield, where teams couldn't afford to focus too heavily on one individual... this player was a passing «specialist» long before he arrived in North London, so only an arrogant or ignorant individual would try to reinvent the wheel and / or not surround such a talent with the necessary components... in regards to Ox, Walcott and Welbeck, although they all possess serious talents I see them in large part as headless chickens who are on the injury table too much, lack the necessary first - touch and / or lack the finishing flair to warrant their inclusion in a regular starting eleven; I would say that, of the 3, Ox showed the most upside once we went to a back 3, but even he became a bit too consumed by his pending contract talks before the season ended and that concerned me a bit... if I had to choose one of those 3 players to stay on it would be Ox due to his potential as a plausible alternative to Bellerin in that wing - back position should we continue to use that formation... in Sanchez, we get one of the most committed skill players we've seen on this squad for some years but that could all change soon, if it hasn't already of course... strangely enough, even he doesn't make sense given the constructs of the original Wenger offensive model because he holds onto the ball too long and he will give the ball up a little too often in the offensive zone... a fact that is largely forgotten due to his infectious energy and the fact that the numbers he has achieved seem to justify the means... finally, and in many ways most crucially, Giroud, there is nothing about this team or the offensive system that Wenger has traditionally employed that would even suggest such a player would make sense as a starter... too slow, too inefficient and way too easily dispossessed... once again, I think he has some special skills and, at times, has showed some world - class qualities but he's lack of mobility is an albatross around the necks of our offence... so when you ask who would be our best starting 11, I don't have a clue because of the 5 or 6 players that truly deserve a place in this side, 1 just arrived, 3 aren't under contract beyond 2018 and the other was just sold to Juve... man, this is theraputic because following this team is like an addiction to heroin without the benefits

For some reason he's a Wenger favourite, which means he'll be more or less straight back in the starting XI.

I don't mean to be dramatic but I'm coming here less and less since they've been gone, and the reason for it is the amount of keyboard warriors and trolls in this place has probably quadrupled in recent weeks.

look man i understand that you say ozil in the middle means no protection or less than adequate but ozil will be CAM and he is close to scoring a tap - in rather than giving shield to arteta who is an unreliable source and does not deserve the captaincy, wenger only gave it to him cause he gave the players some papering over the cracks statements after the Liverpool, chelsea and man city match and the player does not even have a cap for the national team Wenger may have seen this as a player who can play in and out with no internationals regardless of his qualities on the pitch and the main reason why he sold vermaelen who would have done decent job at CDM and then all that fluid style that arsene thinks he can play dictate «arrogance»!

If fetal monitoring starts picking up drops in heart rates, the very low risk of section means there's more reason to cut immediately and less reason to wait and see.

We all have different reasons behind our parenting decisions — the fact that my reasons differ from yours does not make either of our decisions less valid, it just means we come to the table with different experiences.

Reasoning that the random anarchy and scariness of Halloween should mean moreemphasis on behavior, not less, she plans to spend ample time before that night making him understand that even though there is going to be a lot of activity, the same rules — about touching, moving around — still apply.

It's worth noting that pooping infrequently (less than once a day) at under a month old could mean inadequate milk intake, so you should check in with us to make sure baby is nursing well, but it is not a reason to panic.

I mean, I think the fact that it's not H5N1 is probably what's making me happier, but I don't think, the fact that's an H1N1 is a reason public health authorities would be more or less worried.

It's an exciting season for many reasons — but it also means we'll likely be spending more time indoors, less time exercising, more...

Now with that said, one of the other major reasons that the majority of the population in «westernized» countries are more and more vitamin D deficient is that our animals are being raised in indoor factory environments nowadays and are seeing MUCH less sunshine than the animals are meant to see.

This point really seems to piss people off for whatever reason, but it's simple: buying one less meal a day means you're spending less money.

At the same time, Garcinia Wow will supress your appetite and help you control your cravings in a natural way, which means that it will be less difficult for you to resist temptations — and we all know that those are the reason why our diets so often fail.

The reason muscle mass is important is because the more muscle you have the more calories you will burn to maintain it meaning once again that you will carry less fat.

Reason # 9: The more time you spend bulking up, the more time you spend cutting which means less time you have to gain muscle!

This means they are going to be WAY less likely to flake on you or just abandon their account for no reason.

As for what these WGA nominations mean for Oscar, the WGA is a less solid gauge for Oscar glory than the other guild awards given that each year, many of the frontrunner screenplays are deemed ineligible for the WGA awards for one reason or another.

Worse, Mitchell is as in love with the Dutch angle (the camera canted for no good reason) and the unmotivated pan and zoom as poor, addled Roger Christian, the auteur behind Mr. Preston John Travolta's Battlefield Earth — meaning that while there's little substance in front of the camera, there's somehow less behind it.

All these hot pics in theatres means there's less room for new ones, which is another reason why the weekend of Super Bowl 2018 seems particularly barren of fresh cinema.

It also means less money through union dues, which is one reason the leadership is proposing to increase dues for the first time in 45 years.

Another reason why electronic paper consumes less power than LCDs: They are bistable, meaning they don't need power to maintain an image — only to form a new one.

«Unfortunately the decline in U.S. CD sales means that selection and merchandising of the physical CDs is suffering, which is one of the primary reasons consumers say they purchased CDs less frequently,» said Crupnick.

And you may want to think about if you haven't yet published your book and you're thinking about what to do that means a shorter title, so you want a title that is 80 characters or less, including the subtitle, and the reason we say that is really because of that mobile optimization, so you want to make sure that when a reader is searching for a book on a phone they can see your entire title or as much as possible on a mobile device.

In total, it seems like I'll get 25 - 33 % more words on the K3 screen, which is great for a few reasons: having to press the page turn button less frequently (which is nice in itself) also means I should be able to read faster, and the battery will last longer, since e-Ink screens only use power when you change pages (you should get about 10,000 page turns per battery charge, regardless of how many words are on each page).

Downloading an app to the BlackBerry usually means wading through several pages and prompts; for some reason, most apps have huge legal agreements that require six or so screens of scrolling (as if anyone would read all that, much less comprehend it).

The reason for such help is not because some home buyers didn't lie on their loan applications, or because some lenders didn't look the other way when borrowers were patently unqualified for big loans, or that banks and brokers on Wall Street were not obligated to check the value of securities and properly report them, rather it was a matter of self - interest — fewer foreclosures mean less downward pressure on local home values, including the value of your home and mine.

Multiple hard inquiries may mean that you failed to get money on the first try because of unknown reasons, and they make you look less creditworthy.

I was merely pointing out that with any reasoning (ours or his) prices going up it doesn't mean you have less money

Now for the reason I am less sanguine about S&P 500 intermediate term gains than my peers: Consider what this means in terms of (non-energy) valuations.

There can be many reasons why this happens, but it would probably happen a lot less if people really understood what it means to co-sign a loan.