And by «democratic»
I mean liberal democracy — i.e., a multiparty system, regular competitive elections, and civil liberties.
Not exact matches
Related to that seminal work were arguments from within the
liberal (
meaning the Enlightenment) tradition, most notably: Smith (economics), Hume (skepticism), Tocqueville (
democracy), and Mill (freedom).
The class interest, within the political spectrum of Western
democracies, is on the left; in America this
means «
liberal,» in current terminology.
Perhaps fascism represents a permanent temptation of modern politics, the seduction to leave behind the ambiguities and trade «offs of prosaic
liberal democracy for a true (and truly destructive) «politics of
meaning.»
There has always been a group for whom the promise of
liberal democracy has
meant very little — and that group is getting bigger.
DPT also stipulates that interstate conflicts between two
liberal democracies may emerge, but these are settled by peaceful rather than violent
means.
What do you
mean by «
liberal democracy»?
The political ideology of the people who sat on the left were more
liberal which at the time tended to
mean anti monarchy, pro
democracy, pro free trade and in America it
meant smaller federal government and stronger states rights.
«
Liberal» and «Conservative» as applied to US politics are just labels, they don't
mean anything, the same way Democrats and Republicans don't have any relation to supporting more
democracy over representation or vice versa.
To sustain voting in
liberal democracies, it is vital to give voters immediate feedback on what their votes
mean.
To paraphrase my own words from my Wall Street Journal op - ed last December... Scientists may not like it, but Mooney's analysis explains precisely what it
means to live in a
liberal democracy; when it comes to making decisions, especially big decisions, politics must always trump science.