Sentences with phrase «mean like the fact»

Do you mean like the fact that he did not even acquire the defensive backups necessary to get him past 6 weeks into the season?

Not exact matches

Again, that fact doesn't obviate the option of (or indeed the need for) social critique; it just means that we can't reasonably roll our eyes at the very notion of a place like Hooters, and then merrily skip down to the neighbourhood bar where the waitresses wear short skirts and tube tops all summer.

Buyers like the coolness of the sheets, their old - fashioned crisp feel, and the fact that the elastic runs all the way around the fitted sheet, meaning it won't pull loose from the mattress.

And the fact that it focuses on a family of superheroes also evokes a Fantastic Four - like quality — meaning it's basically the best «Fantastic Four» movie ever made.

You filled them from the top like a garbage bag, While they're comfortable to carry, the fact that they're basically just large open sacks on a carrying frame meant that all of your stuff would get wrinkled, you'd need to unpack the whole bag any time you wanted to look through what you had, it was tough to stay organized, and you ultimately couldn't fit all that much.

The facts are not right here, energy is cheap that means the cost of manufacturing and transporting of goods is low, food and consumers staples already more affordable, so what if a few American oil companies going out of business.the cost of producing oil in middle east is less than $ 10 / bl and we were paying more than $ 140 / bl for it, with that huge profit margin the big oil companies and oil producing nations became richer and the rest of us left behind, with the oil price this low the oil giants don't want to reduce the price at pump even a penny, because they are so greedy.worst case scenario is some CEOs bonuses might drop from $ 20 million to $ 15 millions I am sure they will survive.in terms of the stock market it always bounces back, after all it's just a casino like game.

As Thompson explains, tulips in fact were becoming more popular, particularly in Germany, and, as the first phase of the 30 Years War wound down, it looked like Germany would be victorious, which would mean a better market for tulips.

The fact that Facebook has a dominant market positions means it (like the daily newspaper monopolies of yore) actually could choose to serve as responsible steward of the news ecology if its executives wanted to.

For example, Vessenes wrote me in an email, the fact that there's still only a relatively small number of Monero users means that any massive transaction will stick out like a sore thumb: there just won't be many others of a similar size to mix with.

And the fact that joining the euro, means that you're not allowed to run a budget deficit to pump money into the economy to recover --- just like America has done --- it's that you have to pay debts that are so much beyond your ability to pay, that you'll end up like Haiti did, after it rebelled after the French Revolution.

But even though Trump attaches meaning to irrelevant metrics like bilateral trade deficits in a global economy, where two - thirds of trade flows are intermediate goods and only 3.6 % of the value of an Apple iPhone is Chinese (yet the entire $ 179 cost is chalked up as an import from China, exacerbating the bilateral deficit), the fact is that frictions in the relationship have been increasing since well before this president assumed office.

Combined with the fact that you pay the short term gains taxrate on the interest no matter what and at best you get a capital loss when a loan goes into default means the 6 - 9 % Lending Club claims investors average is probably closer to something like 3 - 5 % after the unfavorable tax treatment.

And yes, we have stated before that there is a difference between crowdfunding portals like SeedInvest and Kickstarter, but that doesn't change the fact that people are looking more and more to the public as a means of raising capital.

Atheists: I know many there are many people that practice religion just by fanaticism, I've seen many people in my opinion stupid (excuse the word) praying to saints hopping to solve their problems by repeating pre-made sentences over and over, but there are others different, I don't think Religion and Science need to be opposites, I believe in God, I'm Catholic and I have many reasons to believe in him, I don't think however that we should pray instead of looking for the cause and applying a solution, Atheists think they are smart because they focus on Science and technology instead of putting their faith in a God, I don't think God will solve our problems, i think he gave us the means to solve them by ourselves that's were God is, also I think that God created everything but not as a Magical thing but stablishing certain rules like Physics and Quimics etc. he's not an idiot and he knew how to make it so everything was on balance, he's the Scientist of Scientist the Mathematic of Mathematics, the Physician of Physicians, from the tiny little fact that a mosquito, an insect species needs to feed from blood from a completely different species, who created the mosquitos that way?

Now you can call that mean and bully like, but it does not change the facts.

I don't LIKE that a girl who doesn't do anything to take responsibility for herself in a situation becomes a trigger for a sociopath but that doesn't mean it isn't a fact that she is.

I'd like to say though, that just because the bible mentions polygamy, murder, sodomy or incest in a matter of fact way, does not mean that it condones those things.

4, this is like the ideology that war is inevitable when in fact war isn't inevitable, conflict is but that doesn't mean conflict has to explode a community.

Then you continue to justify that easy out conclusion by putting God in the same category as Santa Clause, the Easter Bunny, or the Flying Spagetti Monster since you can't prove that they don't exist and it's ridiculous to believe in those ergo that automatically means that is just as ridiculous to believe in a God, like a one conclusion fits all scenario even though that scenario still doesn't change the fact that you are concluding something that can not be proven.

We can not hold parents accountable for ignorance regarding transgender identity without also holding accountable Southern Baptist leaders like Denny Burk who can't be bothered to learn the most basic facts about what it means to be transgender before giving lectures, writing articles, and making resolutions condemning it a sin.

So in the first place I thought that if you were hetero then you liked women how is it that they were hetero and gay??? How do you explain the fact that they would not take lots daughters to mean that they were passing by women in favor of men that sure sounds gay to me.

The word which got translated into Latin as «credo» did not really mean «I believe this as actual fact» but something more like «I put my faith in, or I commit myself to, or I follow the teaching of...».

In fact, when l learn what's meant by «abbot» and «episcopal» When I have clearly understood why Mass precludes a disco ball When I distinguish easily dissent from sensus fidei And when I know the diff» rence twixt a rose window and rosary When I can sing the Salve like a dutiful Gregorian When I know all my heresies, Arian and Nestorian In short when I have exercised my understanding to the full A better ultramontanist never bestrode a papal bull

They wondered about things like people waiting in line to get a snapshot of their family with the senior pastor, the pastor calling everyone «Buddy» and «Sport» instead of by name, and the fact that the pastor slipped into the front row after worship because it was time to deliver the speech for the TV show (I mean sermon for the flock).

Because a phrase like «totalitarian evangelicalism» has a frightening ring to it, I will distinguish it from those «goods» and «partial goods» — which have some justification in the facts of life and human nature — by explaining what I do not mean by it.

The fact is that Abelard was trying to say, with his own passionate awareness of what love can mean in human experience, that in Jesus, God gave us not so much an example of what we should be like but — and this is the big point in his teaching — a vivid and compelling demonstration in a concrete event in history that God does love humanity and will go to any lengths to win from them their glad and committed response.

Without faith, prayer seems like nonsense, but the fact that prayer doesn't solve all of your problems immediately just means that those who pray remain human.

The good news is that there is a pro-life option in Doug Hoffman... and while God (who is surely a monarchist) has not made an endorsement (He rather likes us to endorse Him)... that does not mean we can not note the facts.

======= @Chuckles «I do like also that you at least accepted the fact that these empires had the same idea as the ones you gave which means check and mate my friend and finally getting you to admit that tyrants trying to abolish the religion of the indigenous are not just atheists.

I do like also that you at least accepted the fact that these empires had the same idea as the ones you gave which means check and mate my friend and finally getting you to admit that tyrants trying to abolish the religion of the indigenous are not just atheists.

She's a wise - cracking, comedically abusive and pot - smoking older lady, which means that Perry is playing her in drag — a fact that some other black filmmakers like Spike Lee have criticized, accusing Perry of being too uncomfortably close to racial stereotypes of the past.

In fact a man without soul (that means a man, which denies that he has a soul) will behave like a beast (the Bible reports of a future completely soulless tyrant, which will emerge and behave very bad, thus he is called «The Beast».).

Noni and all those who find themselves ostracised or slandered unfairly firstly God loves you and you are special to him you are his children his daughters and sons do nt ever forget that so you are not alone in fact you are the apple of his eye and he loves you.No matter what people say about you it does nt change the fact that he loves you and will protect you just abide in him he will strengthen you in your weakness.Never think you are alone we have the holy spirit and have other believers even though we may not go to church together we love the Lord just as much as you do which means we are brothers and sisters in Christ.Just trust him and take each day as it comes he promises to never leave us or forsake us.He has given us his strength in our weakness so that like him we are overcomers the head not the tail.Keep asking the Lord what it is he wants you to do and be obedient though it may be hard but in the end it will prove good for you for the Lord is for you not against you.regards brentnz

Besides, it's not like disbelief in something means you are a member of an organization, it is in fact the exact opposite.

You means scientic facts, like we come from Primates and the earth id billions os years old..

U idiot bigot she brought up jesus in a discussion about santa and said «I mean jesus was a white man too but you know its like we have he was a historical figure I mean thats a verifiable fact...» I watched the whole interview too if u like her so much why did nt u listen to her «just because it makes you uncomfortable doesn't mean you can just change it...» she did say those words so edited or not she proposed a lie as the truth jesus was as white as any middle eastern person is

So, in fact, it does mean a good bit more than the likes of Lindsey Lohan.

It is to people like that, who are facing the facts, that the Christian Gospel speaks with high meaning.

When you try to use Evolution to explain anything, it just sounds so absurd, yet they (by they, i mean evolutionists) try to push it on us like it's a verified fact?

The very fact that the name of this Messiah means «God saves» shows that no matter what Jesus was like as a person, the correlation of these texts and language, written at different times and in different places all communicate the same message: Jesus was the Son of God, the Word made flesh and thus, one can not deny it, he had to be telling the truth.

Even a professed atheist like Jean - Paul Sartre, despite his protests and despite his insistence that the only meaning is what we ourselves put into things, evidently still finds sufficient sense in the simple fact of living so that he does not take his own life.

It's like smoking, the brand does nt matter, its the fact that you smoke that means you have a problem.

Like most fake news stories, it wasn't based on any real events of facts, but is a work of complete fiction meant to fool readers in order to generate clicks and social media shares.

And this in spite of the fact that I do not by any means doubt that you have completely understood and assented to the newest philosophy, which like the modern age generally seems to suffer from a curious distraction, confusing promise with performance, the superscription with the execution; for what age and what philosophy was ever so wonderful and wonderfully great as our own — in superscriptions!

I don't think people mean to be like this, in fact I think their intentions are (as you stated) are to be nice people.

Those among us who call themselves traditionalists and invoke things like «religion» and «family» in a spirit that makes these honest words feel mean and tainted are usually loyal first of all to a tooth - and - nail competitiveness our history does not in fact enshrine.

Perhaps I am misunderstanding as well when it seems like all you want to consider is the cold hard facts of matter without accounting properly for the human condition to misunderstand them completely and yet be able to draw out useful meaning though imprecise, anyway, and the impact such actual conditions have on your objective reality, which isn't if you exclude them.

You suffer from Confirmation Bias... no matter what EVIDENCE is provided you will deny it because in order to accept it would mean you would have to OPEN your mind to the fact that what you believe is a lie (just like the entire bible has been proven to be).

At any rate it shows a complete failure to understand its meaning when it is objected that my definition reduces the event of revelation to a cause which sets self - understanding in motion, so that it is no longer a fact which interferes and changes reality, like a miracle.

Of course, I am not a theologian or well read or educated in the Bible with all the pertinent historical, cultural, or grammatical facts required to understand and interpret the text in my intellectual grasp, so I may have misunderstood your meaning, missed a point, or maybe we're saying the same thing but each from a different perspective, like is said those who misread Paul's Roman epistle and James» epistle.