Sentences with phrase «mean paying more money»

Yes, young and healthy, pay less in premiums and higher deductibles (means you pay more money), charge pre-existing condition, elderly and women

Take me for example, I have a German or «European» account and have to pay in EURO — well this means I pay more money since it has to be converted in US Dollar — you see my dilemma — I get ripped off.

Not exact matches

«With EEDAR estimating current League of Legends revenues to be more than $ 1 billion per year, this means that the value of Riot is significantly higher than $ 1 billion and Tencent would have paid a lot of money for the remaining 7 % of the company's shares,» Walker says.

(Which by the way, may mean paying more taxes later if tax rates go up or you're making more money.)

That said, I do think in a situation like this, there is a lot of money to be made for a business in Clearpath's position — if Uber really wants that trademark, it might be willing to pay for it, and that amount of money might end up meaning more to a smaller company than its existing brand.»

And, more than anything, what made me an outcast was that I always thought entrepreneurship meant providing a product or service someone was willing to pay money for.

Being physically attractive can also literally pay off, as many people believe it can mean you make more money.

Note also that if VS customers are willing to pay more for the cotton in their panties, that inevitably means they're spending less money on something else — and spending less on something else means someone else, somewhere, is earning less money.

If the current ratio is less than one, it can mean that any current liabilities business owners are paying are costing the company more money than the assets they are bringing in.

The biggest disadvantage of buying a Treasury bond is that the interest rate could rise during its term, which means your money might be tied up in an investment that pays 2.75 percent interest when you could be getting 4 percent or 5 percent — or more.

This means that countries that owe foreign debt, that's almost all denominated in dollars, especially to the International Monetary Fund or the World Bank, they're going to have to pay much more money in higher - priced dollars for their own currency.

But paying just the minimum means you'll actually pay more money to your issuer in the long run because of interest.

But I would rather pay the taxes now, and yes that means giving more money to the government now, than get taxed on it later in life.

That can hurt a company's stock price if it's borrowed a lot, as the interest it's paying on that debt is more expensive — meaning more money will be spent paying it down, leaving less for product development, marketing, etc..

Another benefit is that the more money you put down, the less you borrow, meaning you'll pay less in interest payments over the life of the loan.

Plus, you don't have to pay fees on binary options, meaning you get to keep more of your money.

This means investors in German two year bonds are putting a hefty premium on safety but the more significant point is that essentially YOU pay the German government to take your money!

CDs are meant for investors willing to set aside some cash for a set period of time while bank money market accounts are typically more tied bill - paying than investing.

But even though you have to pay for expert advice, they are all worth it if it means that you can earn more money in the process.

Of course, people can borrow money to top up a reserve account, pay their bills by borrowing more, and have perfect credit without the means to buy an expensive house.

Low financing costs means auto buyers can borrow more money to pay for a more expensive utility vehicle.

So if you have one kind of growth — booming financial fortunes in the stock market, higher real - estate prices and more expensive means of living — then you are going to have slower growth in the real economy because money is diverted from peoples» pay - checks away from buying goods and services to just having to pay the banks.

If you mean the owners should invest more money into the club to pay the players higher salaries (salaries are payroll) than the only way to that through equity (shares or rights issues).

Guardiola was probably more than happy to wait until the summer and get a freebiie but in the light of Jesus's injury leaving him with only one striker would probably pay decent money to get him now and by now I don't mean January 31st!

The money they were gonna pay, it's allot, must mean they planned on him becoming much more valuable in time.

Or maybe you meant Wenger is getting into a bidding war so Everton end up paying more for Lucas and have to sell Lukaku to recoup the money.

Emirates stadium and huge sponsor deals we finally have had two poor years by his standards at the helm we always havent been so great and are we weak supporters or strong give him a contract i mean hes won with ants for money let him spend for once cause even if we do get new manager inflation has occured and no body else will win with the small amounts we gave him to spend and in 20 years actuall more it seems the club is finally willing to spend give him a contract let him spend and if we do nt improve which i think we will i think that the club is finally willing to spend shows were on an upturn because as long as top four the owner and board weren't and after we spend big or somewhat big for once and auba and mkhitaryan arent the big im hoping for i want more if liverpoodlians can pay 75million for a cb let wenget spend a bit and if we still do bad we can always sack him or ask him to leave wouldnt be uncommon but we owe it to him and do nt say we do not because emirates london colney that will bring in high talent here for years to come and we have never spent for him just gave little and hes always done big things with little i think he can do bigger things in his final years if we give him big i do nt see us in decline but if we sack him we will be for a good three maybe four years

Time for some brutal honesty... this team, as it stands, is in no better position to compete next season than they were 12 months ago, minus the fact that some fans have been easily snowed by the acquisition of Lacazette, the free transfer LB and the release of Sanogo... if you look at the facts carefully you will see a team that still has far more questions than answers... to better show what I mean by this statement I will briefly discuss the current state of affairs on a position - by - position basis... in goal we have 4 potential candidates, but in reality we have only 1 option with any real future and somehow he's the only one we have actively tried to get rid of for years because he and his father were a little too involved on social media and he got caught smoking (funny how people still defend Wiltshire under the same and far worse circumstances)... you would think we would want to keep any goaltender that Juventus had interest in, as they seem to have a pretty good history when it comes to that position... as far as the defenders on our current roster there are only a few individuals whom have the skill and / or youth worthy of our time and / or investment, as such we should get rid of anyone who doesn't meet those simple requirements, which means we should get rid of DeBouchy, Gibbs, Gabriel, Mertz and loan out Chambers to see if last seasons foray with Middlesborough was an anomaly or a prediction of things to come... some fans have lamented wildly about the return of Mertz to the starting lineup due to his FA Cup performance but these sort of pie in the sky meanderings are indicative of what's wrong with this club and it's wishy - washy fan - base... in addition to these moves the club should aggressively pursue the acquisition of dominant and mobile CB to stabilize an all too fragile defensive group that has self - destructed on numerous occasions over the past 5 seasons... moving forward and building on our need to re-establish our once dominant presence throughout the middle of the park we need to target a CDM then do whatever it takes to get that player into the fold without any of the usual nickel and diming we have become famous for (this kind of ruthless haggling has cost us numerous special players and certainly can't help make the player in question feel good about the way their future potential employer feels about them)... in order for us to become dominant again we need to be strong up the middle again from Goalkeeper to CB to DM to ACM to striker, like we did in our most glorious years before and during Wenger's reign... with this in mind, if we want Ozil to be that dominant attacking midfielder we can't keep leaving him exposed to constant ridicule about his lack of defensive prowess and provide him with the proper players in the final third... he was never a good defensive player in Real or with the German National squad and they certainly didn't suffer as a result of his presence on the pitch... as for the rest of the midfield the blame falls squarely in the hands of Wenger and Gazidis, the fact that Ramsey, Ox, Sanchez and even Ozil were allowed to regularly start when none of the aforementioned had more than a year left under contract is criminal for a club of this size and financial might... the fact that we could find money for Walcott and Xhaka, who weren't even guaranteed starters, means that our whole business model needs a complete overhaul... for me it's time to get rid of some serious deadweight, even if it means selling them below what you believe their market value is just to simply right this ship and change the stagnant culture that currently exists... this means saying goodbye to Wiltshire, Elneny, Carzola, Walcott and Ramsey... everyone, minus Elneny, have spent just as much time on the training table as on the field of play, which would be manageable if they weren't so inconsistent from a performance standpoint (excluding Carzola, who is like the recent version of Rosicky — too bad, both will be deeply missed)... in their places we need to bring in some proven performers with no history of injuries... up front, although I do like the possibilities that a player like Lacazette presents, the fact that we had to wait so many years to acquire some true quality at the striker position falls once again squarely at the feet of Wenger... this issue highlights the ultimate scam being perpetrated by this club since the arrival of Kroenke: pretend your a small market club when it comes to making purchases but milk your fans like a big market club when it comes to ticket prices and merchandising... I believe the reason why Wenger hasn't pursued someone of Henry's quality, minus a fairly inexpensive RVP, was that he knew that they would demand players of a similar ilk to be brought on board and that wasn't possible when the business model was that of a «selling» club... does it really make sense that we could only make a cheeky bid for Suarez, or that we couldn't get Higuain over the line when he was being offered up for half the price he eventually went to Juve for, or that we've only paid any interest to strikers who were clearly not going to press their current teams to let them go to Arsenal like Benzema or Cavani... just part of the facade that finally came crashing down when Sanchez finally called their bluff... the fact remains that no one wants to win more than Sanchez, including Wenger, and although I don't agree with everything that he has done off the field, I would much rather have Alexis front and center than a manager who has clearly bought into the Kroenke model in large part due to the fact that his enormous ego suggests that only he could accomplish great things without breaking the bank... unfortunately that isn't possible anymore as the game has changed quite dramatically in the last 15 years, which has left a largely complacent and complicit Wenger on the outside looking in... so don't blame those players who demanded more and were left wanting... don't blame those fans who have tried desperately to raise awareness for several years when cracks began to appear... place the blame at the feet of those who were well aware all along of the potential pitfalls of just such a plan but continued to follow it even when it was no longer a financial necessity, like it ever really was...

Foles will almost definitely never make the endorsement money that Brady has, but leading the Eagles to a win over the Patriots would likely mean more big pay days are on the way for the quarterback before all is said and done.

yeah thats what I mean, Man Utd refusing to pay 21 mil does not make sense after all the negotiation.Because they obviously have the money and they have paid more than that for other players.

Arsenal FC need to change with the time and unfortunately that means paying players even more money.

If they pay less, they would expand their business, and that means more jobs would be created and the residential consumers will have more money to pay for the more expensive power.

Additionally, taxes like the inheritance tax (taxing money you pass to your descendants) and property taxes (directly taxing your held property yearly) operate on a similar formula, meaning that the more wealthy people pay more both as a matter of percentage and absolute value.

Maude began and ended quite touchy - feely, but the meat of the piece fairly accurately represented what you might expect a Tory platform on the third sector to look like: we need a «rehabilitation revolution'to tackle unprecedented levels of reoffending, fuelled by addiction, illiteracy and family breakdown; the state consistently fails to get those who have never worked, lone parents, and those on incapacity benefit back to work; charities should be paid by results; and the third sector is means of saving taxpayer money and delivering services more efficiently and effectively.

That means taxpayers would no longer be able to deduct the amount they pay in state and local taxes — like income or property taxes — from their federal tax return, making it more burdensome for high - tax states to raise money for transit improvements.

That would mean many people who have put money into share portfolios or property as a retirement nest - egg will pay more tax when they sell.

«When they are a graduate, they have to pay, but on the other hand they will get a degree and that means that they can earn more money and on average we calculate that it is a 400 per cent return on their investment, and that's pretty good.»

«Closing the pay gap for that amount of money would mean women could pay almost six more additional months of child care for their children,» Baskin said.

I mean, to sell for more than 10 times what Christie's had estimated, it shows that Christie's just vastly underestimated the demand or the ability of Star Trek fans to pay for these things or that there is a still a huge, you know, level [love] of Star Trek that, you know, people have money to spend on it.

The exigencies of corporate life naturally chose profit - seeking over disposal and that meant expanding the market, finding more ways to use soy ingredients in processing and convincing more people to pay money for soy - based imitation foods.

You won't be paying a cent more but it just means I will make a little money for your purchase.

I mean I make more money as a sole shareholder than I would as a public company paying myself a salary and I wouldn't be able to sell my shares all that easily.

The site is free to join and operates a «token» based payment system, which means instead of having to pay a monthly flat fee for site membership (as with most subscription sites in this category) users can spend their tokens as they wish, meaning their money will, more often than not, go further.

Now, this does mean that you're going to be paying more money up front, but if you can swing it, you might as well save the cash.

However, although a larger budget may mean you have the option of paying a higher price for a programmer, the web site security is not guaranteed by more money.

As for the ps4 and 720 having better graphics I call bill shit on that I mean they could if you wouldn't mind paying 1 grand + for your system not to mention Sony suffered a huge loss in money thanks to the ps3 so I doubt sinking even more money I to a ps4 will do them any good seeing as that was the plan for the ps3 as for 360 it's already been stated that the 720 will focus on a beast kinetic which of course we can all lol because kiniect is crap even if they beefed it up

Voters understood that passage of this proposition would mean more money in their classrooms, better pay for the teachers in their schools, more control at the local level, and more information for parents.

But if your parents need to raise money to pay for your physical education teacher or librarian, then you will have to raise significant amounts of money, and that will mean bigger and more frequent events.

By allowing parents to pay for meals online through the sQuid system, pupils were coming to school with less money in their pockets, meaning it was spent more responsibly.

In simpler terms, «Get rid of the bottom performers and redistribute students to the better teachers and pay them more using the money that no longer goes to teachers who are now seeking other means of employment.»