Situations in which mean reversion does not happen are rare enough as to make
a mean reversion assumption a consistent friend to the investor.
Not exact matches
When it over-or under - shoots it accounts for this with the
assumption of
mean reversion to 15x.
Granted, such a prediction would be entirely pinned on the
assumptions of
mean reversion (to 6 % growth p / a, and to a CAPE of 15), but it might provide an alternative (or at least discussion worthy)
means of testing the predictions of the model.
According to Wikipedia: «In finance,
mean reversion is the
assumption that a stock's price will tend to move to the average price over time».
Since even hockey - stick supporters now acknowledge that these were high - amplitude events in the Northern Hemisphere, there should be common agreement that
mean -
reversion is, to put it mildly, an unsafe
assumption at best.