A larger government does not
mean running deficits or a higher level of debt or debt burden.
Not exact matches
By second - order effects, I
mean whether cutting the
deficit will in the short
run increase other forms of investment and consumption demand by increasing confidence or reduce other forms of investment and consumption demand by reducing spending.
And the fact that joining the euro,
means that you're not allowed to
run a budget
deficit to pump money into the economy to recover --- just like America has done --- it's that you have to pay debts that are so much beyond your ability to pay, that you'll end up like Haiti did, after it rebelled after the French Revolution.
Most managers
running retail and pension money have no idea what a triple - hook rating
means for any company with massive cash flow
deficits operating in a financial environment in which the Fed is not printing trillions of dollars that can be recycled into bad ideas.
Because capital exports are just the obverse of a current account surplus, this
meant that after spending much of the 1990s in
deficit, Germany's excess production, caused not by a surge in production but rather a decline in consumption, was resolved by the country's
running a current account surplus.
Students in every mainstream macroeconomics class, and that
means almost all students, would have predicted, based on the nonsense they were learning, that the high
deficits and high public debt ratios in Japan at the time, should have driven interest rates sky high, that bond markets should have stopped buying government bonds, that the government should have
run out of money, and all the time that these disasters were unfolding, that inflation should have been be galloping towards hyperinflation.
At the same time, the government's decision to
run a
deficit means a weak dollar, and experts warn that more debt also
means larger interest payments and a weaker currency.
Because before it was guy The Shrub, who sorta kinda
ran the
deficit way up and started two pointless wars and wrecked the economy and little stuff like that, which people seem to think
means that we Republicans can't select a decent candidate for the life of us.
I
mean, this is the Heat's game plan: make the game as choppy as possible to prevent any sort
run by the Sixers, because the Heat are one of those teams that do not (normally) have the ability or firepower to dig out of double - digit
deficits.
The 2003 team did the impossible by coming back from two 3 - 1
deficits to get to the Western Conference Final, but 1) this is not that team nor does it have anyone around that was a part of that
run, and 2) just because it's happened before still
means it's extremely unlikely.
Also, I'm not sure what you
mean by «talk of a «structural
deficit» is rubbish»: as things stand, without some major fiscal contraction, do you expect the government to still be
running a
deficit in a few years from now?
«We know that the size of the budget
deficit run up by the previous Government
means that difficult decisions need to be taken, and Derbyshire police will have to take their share of that pain.
You know as those things began to wither, and I think they probably will in a world where money becomes somewhat scarcer — I
mean look at the size of the
deficits we are now
running.
That
means that they
ran a calorie
deficit which
means they will be burning fat and losing weight.
In order to shed pounds your body needs to
run a calorie
deficit,
meaning you need to burn more than you consume.
This
means that, despite restructuring in 2010, the service is
running at a
deficit and is no longer viable.»
This
meant the program was likely to
run a
deficit.
Social Security is expected to start
running a
deficit in 2016,
meaning that it will be paying out more than it is receiving in taxes.
Increased supply — the combination of the increased
deficit plus the
run - off from the Federal Reserve's balance sheet
means that there will be an extra $ 500 billion of new U.S. Treasury supply