Sentences with phrase «mean something to authors»

Not exact matches

If you're considering spending outside of that budget or prioritizing something material over a bill coming due, it may mean you need to cut back in some other way, according to Tom Corley, an accountant, financial planner and author of «Rich Kids: How to Raise Our Children to Be Happy and Successful in Life.»

And trying to prove an empty tomb means something special via unknown authors and a shoddy list of alleged witnesses is grasping at a lot of straw.

Clive, you point out how others often don't understand what Jesus was saying; but while Jesus often labors to try and make things clear to the unbeliever («Oh, you of little faith) or at the very least the author tries to make it clear for us in retrospect (At the time they didn't understand that he spoke of this...), in this case Jesus switches from something that might be figurative to essentially say «no, I seriously mean this» and it concludes not with Jesus saying «don't go away, this is what I actually mean» but confirming that people would refuse to accept that God intended for them to actually fill themselves with the life that He offered so they stopped following him.

But whereas in translating scientific prose the aim is simply to reproduce with complete accuracy the author's statements, in translating «poetic» language the primary aim is not just to reproduce statements about reality but, as far as may be, to make the same communication of reality — which will mean trying to reproduce something of the author's «tone of voice», something of the mood and colour of tie original.

After reading this article, It's quite apparent that the author has zero idea of what it means to actually be spiritual, and instead tries to attack something different from his own beliefs.

We need to invent a new word for people willing to believe the writings of unknown authors, of unknown origin, of an unknown but ancient time, which is badly worded, internally AND externally (with modern science) inconsistent, full of statements with no actual arguments to back them up, with the only decently educated people to back it all up are theologians who twist the meaning of words and commit logical fallacies and still only try to prove that SOMETHING must exist, not that christianity is the truth.

For me to actually seek out an author so I can email them some kudos means something.

It all looks like something that was either meant as preliminary data and not for distribution to anyone other than the authors or a work where the authors weren't paying attention to what they were doing.

But in order for your interaction to mean something, you've got to put a bit of effort into it: a one - click «Like» or «Poke» just won't cut it, say the study authors.

Be ready to go head to head with the big - name authors and the major houses, because «success» is soon going to mean something completely different from what it means today, and once we get there, the genie will never go back in the bottle.

, much less a coherent one, and it tries to redefine the definition of «author» so that it means something that it never has before.

Author used to mean something, when major publishers were selective and normally vetted out the terrible and bad writers.

And while you may think you're pretty much writing live every time you write (writing dead being so hard to pull off), author Kate Pullinger means something more Houdini - ish when she says «live writing.»

List Trades: This means swapping newsletter promotion with other authors — it will only work if their audience is similar to yours, and if YOU»VE already built up your list (so you have something of value to trade).

I mean, hey, maybe some buyers tried something new in the meantime and discovered a new author to like.

I don't mean to be argumentative, but you're asking me to remove something which is 100 % factual and 100 % relevant to her readers who would like to know that -LCB- author redacted -RCB- is a NY Times Bestselling author.

But his comment reminded me of something I think we all need to remember — the changes in publishing mean we, as authors, don't have to slow our process down so we ONLY write one book a year.

The ridiculous hoop jumping that authors have to endure in order to have their books even sold in a «real» bookstore, let alone featured, means that indie physical stores have the power to offer authors something they can't get otherwise, while at the same time not simply competing as violently with major online retailers.

Authors used to be able to buy ad space from book newsletter publishers like Book Bub, Ereader News Today, and Free Kindle Books & Tips, rise up the ranks, and have it mean something in terms of long - term and «halo» sales.

Adding Amazon is something we've wanted to do for our authors for quite a while, and we're very happy and excited about what this will mean, going forward!

First, the terminology — line editing, copy editing, proofreading — seems to mean something slightly different to every author, editor, publisher, magazine, agent, and online journal, and this makes it tough for the author seeking an editor to know exactly what it is they're asking for.

For authors that means that time spent doing something that could be delegated can be spent writing more books... which leads to more revenue.

The email to authors also said they can earn UP TO 60 % royalties on their print editions — again, it's those words «up to» that don't mean a lot — and that they can eventually have access to list their books in expanded distribution to bookstores, something they've been able to do all along through Cto authors also said they can earn UP TO 60 % royalties on their print editions — again, it's those words «up to» that don't mean a lot — and that they can eventually have access to list their books in expanded distribution to bookstores, something they've been able to do all along through CTO 60 % royalties on their print editions — again, it's those words «up to» that don't mean a lot — and that they can eventually have access to list their books in expanded distribution to bookstores, something they've been able to do all along through Cto» that don't mean a lot — and that they can eventually have access to list their books in expanded distribution to bookstores, something they've been able to do all along through Cto list their books in expanded distribution to bookstores, something they've been able to do all along through Cto bookstores, something they've been able to do all along through Cto do all along through CS.

That means that what authors need to protect themselves is something akin to a legal consortium that can negotiate on their behalf.

Look, something a certain author needs to grasp is that although you may like your writing style, and the book is (traditionally, indies don't have this limitation) published so you can't change it, that doesn't mean that readers have to buy it or like it.

This ups it, but for the better, because the current payout is reasonable, meaning that if readers plow through the books (and I've done my job as an author and written something compelling enough to make them want to), I make as much as a sale.

Indie authors are viscerally connected to book sales — you can track your rankings and sales by the hour, and those numbers mean something.

Future editors may struggle to hang onto their gatekeeping role, and only remain tastemakers if their name carries currency with readers, meaning they become brands that signify something important to both authors and the target audience.

That doesn't mean there isn't a way for a self - pubbed author to work something out with OverDrive and then offer their books to libraries.

But that doesn't mean the authors were wrong to want something else, especially not to the point of being bullied about their choices.

Howey sees something else here, however: «I think it means that a sustained and profitable career as a science fiction author is more likely, these days, to have its origin in self - publishing.»

And that doesn't mean this blog post was a cheeky attempt to get you clicking; it simply recognises the eternal search for perfection as being something that makes self - published authors special.

That major publishers currently can't allow a small bookstore to do something that's in their own and in their authors» best interests means the system is broken.

These authors make the completely unsurprising point that that there is a correlation between ENSO indices and global mean temperature — something that has been well known for decades — and then go on to claim that that all trends are explained by this correlation as well.

According to «Type Talk at Work» author Otto Kroeger, «Sensors prefer to focus on the facts and the details of something and have less need to interpret what they mean.»

Edinburgh About Blog Provides science advice to authors (well the PhD's got ta be good for something), writes about space exploration, and makes a mean omlette.