Sentences with phrase «mean spending big»

It's theme park season and that can mean spending big money.

Evweryone thinks that means spending big on a big name player and hope he continues his good form in epl.

Not exact matches

For bigger businesses, this means if one thousand of your employees spend just one hour per day «cyberloafing,» it could cost you $ 35 million each year.

It meant the company's biggest spending priorities wouldn't be on code, but on steel, machinery, and workers.

This means people with big ideas don't need to spend big money to turn a concept into a product.

It's obviously a big risk to go into the U.S. market, and Target was a national launch, which meant a national marketing campaign, which meant a big spend and a lot of risk.

You don't have to give big gifts, it might just mean spending a little extra time with a client or making a small contribution to a cause you know an employee holds dear.

Just as major food corporations sell processed foods that are loaded with added sugar and chemicals meant to keep people eating, big tech companies have been repeatedly accused of designing their apps to maximize the time people spend on them.

And just as major food corporations sell processed foods that are loaded with added sugar and chemicals meant to keep people eating, Turkle and other addiction experts say big tech companies have been repeatedly accused of designing their apps to maximize the time people spend on them.

In the first instance, this has meant a big drop in investment spending, especially in the oil patch.

Delaney said he sees two events unfolding: «The existing players... will adopt this rule, make changes to their business models as needed, and they'll work hard to keep every one of their customers because one of biggest costs that financial services companies have are what's called customer acquisition — meaning the money they spend for customers,» he said.

Kevin Page, the parliamentary budget officer, recently estimated that an aging population — which means a smaller tax haul and bigger health and other outlays — will leave Ottawa and the provinces with a $ 46 - billion - a-year fiscal gap to fix by cutting spending or hiking taxes.

Some shoppers enjoy the challenge and seek out the best deals, even if it means spending the night on a folding chair outside a big retailer on Black Friday.

If Christians believe that the church and the worship it offers to God ought in some ways to counter the norms and practices of the surrounding culture, then what does it mean that after spending so much of our time each week in front of computer monitors, cell phones, and sports bar TVs, we come to church on Sunday and happily position ourselves in front of the biggest screen of all?

Turow spends 164 pages interviewing both Millennials and big thinkers in the food world — such as Anthony Bourdain, Michael Pollan, Mark Bittman, and Marion Nestle — about the current food obsession and what it means for our future.

The high banking and high speeds at Texas Motor Speedway mean that the cars spend most of the race together in one big pack.

It means Wenger spends relatively big mon in January which he hasn't done in ages.

Icardi recently signed a new contract with Inter Milan, but his class means that Rodgers should seriously consider spending big in order to bring the 22 - year - old to Anfield.

Because we can play with the big boys does not mean we can spend with the big boys.

We spent big the following year, multiple buys meant we spent over double what we spent the year before on Ozil... Maybe this had a knock on effect because the following year we only got Cech in the main transfer window and then the unknown but brilliant Elneny in the winter window.

There is more money than ever floating around football, which means those clubs who spend big will attract and retain the top players.

What I was saying is that Arsenal could not afford two big name signings considering what had been spent on replacing keeper, RB, CB, and CF.. In addition Arsenal had a right of first refusal meaning that it would not have had influence over the price at which Fab would be sold.

that even if big league teams started spending more, the Rule 5 draft would take on a whole new meaning because teams can only carry so many guys for so long, and over time good young players would have to be exposed in the Rule 5 draft.

Arsenal board thought that with the FFP rools salaries and signing fees would go down and all be equal, what with our new stadium with extra incom and new sponsership they thought we will do well without spending big, but unfortunately FIFA is droping FFP they can't control it like they thought Manchester City already saying they are not following rools this season and they are spending big eaven if it means huge fines

With reports of Utd wanting to spend big during this transfer window, I wouldn't rule them out, lets just wait and see who means business by the signings they make!

Not only does the massive revenue that clubs in the Premier League receive make it harder for the Gunners to sign their players, it means that all of the clubs are willing and able to spend big money on players and they are not even big name players half the time.

as much as it pains me to say it, he does not have what it takes OR is basically scared and very lazy I mean its rediculous the club has an ethos of not spending big money on players that would make a difference but spend in excess of 360,000 per annum on a player that does NOTHING.

In total, that could mean # 67m for Wenger to spend on a big name in attack, though it may be just short of enough in today's market.

The Blues will no doubt be a tough nut to crack again, especially as the easing of the FFP rules means that they can spend big money to strengthen an already strong squad, but I am not so worried about our other rivals for a number of reasons.

You tell him Dennis — not sure what the big deal is, I mean jeez even I could spend # 100M on players if given the chance.

With Chelsea now taking their spending to well over # 50 million that means Arsene can seal a few deals and still be the smallest spender of the big teams.

Then if (and I mean a very big IF) we go on to win the title, he can come out and claim we did it without spending big, and take all of the credit and applause for being the first manager in a long time to not «buy» the title.

This means big dividends for the share holders and to HELL with the fans who spend their hard earned cash supporting Arsenal.

Spending big on top players just increases your chances of winning the league but does not necessarily mean you'll win the league.If that was the case a team like Man City would've won it season after season.The thing is we are also a top team and we've been very poor.Spending should not be an excuse but if it is then why try to win the league when we know we surely won't outspend every team.

That statement doesn't mean we can't spend a lot of money to bring top talent here — and I am in agreement about what you said about the next two DP signings, the FO must have a pretty big pile of money to play with.

It could mean that we don't have to spend any money on a CM and Wenger can reinforce another area with a «bigger buy», or rather beat any competiton for the player he wants, regardless of being a «big buy» or bargain.

Emirates stadium and huge sponsor deals we finally have had two poor years by his standards at the helm we always havent been so great and are we weak supporters or strong give him a contract i mean hes won with ants for money let him spend for once cause even if we do get new manager inflation has occured and no body else will win with the small amounts we gave him to spend and in 20 years actuall more it seems the club is finally willing to spend give him a contract let him spend and if we do nt improve which i think we will i think that the club is finally willing to spend shows were on an upturn because as long as top four the owner and board weren't and after we spend big or somewhat big for once and auba and mkhitaryan arent the big im hoping for i want more if liverpoodlians can pay 75million for a cb let wenget spend a bit and if we still do bad we can always sack him or ask him to leave wouldnt be uncommon but we owe it to him and do nt say we do not because emirates london colney that will bring in high talent here for years to come and we have never spent for him just gave little and hes always done big things with little i think he can do bigger things in his final years if we give him big i do nt see us in decline but if we sack him we will be for a good three maybe four years

I hope we keep wenger give the man a long term contract you must want some unloyal cheapskate whos been fired at 5 clubs and successful at 1 or 2 for a few years when the club spent big cause they got a new manager and after a couple years got fired beacause those spendy players got old and that manager did nothing we have the most loyal consistent winning manager in europe and if the linesman did nt make incorrect call we woould of been 1 - 0 up and mkhitaryan played poor balls in the rain which we always play bad in amd are you suffering short term memory loss we beat tottenham 2 - 0 at home so we still won the derby on aggregate this season again thanks to mr.wenger i mean where to people come out woth these low iq thoughts and mostly you have to fire three new managers before you get a couple good seasons then start the circus again people should be embarrassed wenger to stay

Which is why i say extend the contract spend big for once and especially since world cup year which means limited summer training time for new manager with squad.

If this is true then we can only hope that Wenger and the board have learned from their struggles to bring players in this time, and that the big spending from the likes of Man City and United will mean that we have less competition for our transfer targets in January.

It's claimed that he's ready to spend big in order to sign his preferred target, and according to the report, it appears as though Griezmann is the man to fill that void despite the fact that it will mean a transfer battle with long - time admirers Manchester United.

The problem is with ur stubborn attitude.Thing is you think you can win the premiership on the cheap, but you cant cause you can't motivate the players ffs.Leicester winning the premiership will give you one more reason to say see i told you we don't need to spend big money to win the league, but you had 12 attempts to do so for the past 12 years cause our team for those year was better than Leicester squad and you still didn't win a thing.Just because you have a mouth doesn't mean you could say anything show some respect for the fans, stop blaming the fans its the mediocre players who you have at the club that needs to blamed.And you as well for not spending any money on outfield player in the summer.

Time for some brutal honesty... this team, as it stands, is in no better position to compete next season than they were 12 months ago, minus the fact that some fans have been easily snowed by the acquisition of Lacazette, the free transfer LB and the release of Sanogo... if you look at the facts carefully you will see a team that still has far more questions than answers... to better show what I mean by this statement I will briefly discuss the current state of affairs on a position - by - position basis... in goal we have 4 potential candidates, but in reality we have only 1 option with any real future and somehow he's the only one we have actively tried to get rid of for years because he and his father were a little too involved on social media and he got caught smoking (funny how people still defend Wiltshire under the same and far worse circumstances)... you would think we would want to keep any goaltender that Juventus had interest in, as they seem to have a pretty good history when it comes to that position... as far as the defenders on our current roster there are only a few individuals whom have the skill and / or youth worthy of our time and / or investment, as such we should get rid of anyone who doesn't meet those simple requirements, which means we should get rid of DeBouchy, Gibbs, Gabriel, Mertz and loan out Chambers to see if last seasons foray with Middlesborough was an anomaly or a prediction of things to come... some fans have lamented wildly about the return of Mertz to the starting lineup due to his FA Cup performance but these sort of pie in the sky meanderings are indicative of what's wrong with this club and it's wishy - washy fan - base... in addition to these moves the club should aggressively pursue the acquisition of dominant and mobile CB to stabilize an all too fragile defensive group that has self - destructed on numerous occasions over the past 5 seasons... moving forward and building on our need to re-establish our once dominant presence throughout the middle of the park we need to target a CDM then do whatever it takes to get that player into the fold without any of the usual nickel and diming we have become famous for (this kind of ruthless haggling has cost us numerous special players and certainly can't help make the player in question feel good about the way their future potential employer feels about them)... in order for us to become dominant again we need to be strong up the middle again from Goalkeeper to CB to DM to ACM to striker, like we did in our most glorious years before and during Wenger's reign... with this in mind, if we want Ozil to be that dominant attacking midfielder we can't keep leaving him exposed to constant ridicule about his lack of defensive prowess and provide him with the proper players in the final third... he was never a good defensive player in Real or with the German National squad and they certainly didn't suffer as a result of his presence on the pitch... as for the rest of the midfield the blame falls squarely in the hands of Wenger and Gazidis, the fact that Ramsey, Ox, Sanchez and even Ozil were allowed to regularly start when none of the aforementioned had more than a year left under contract is criminal for a club of this size and financial might... the fact that we could find money for Walcott and Xhaka, who weren't even guaranteed starters, means that our whole business model needs a complete overhaul... for me it's time to get rid of some serious deadweight, even if it means selling them below what you believe their market value is just to simply right this ship and change the stagnant culture that currently exists... this means saying goodbye to Wiltshire, Elneny, Carzola, Walcott and Ramsey... everyone, minus Elneny, have spent just as much time on the training table as on the field of play, which would be manageable if they weren't so inconsistent from a performance standpoint (excluding Carzola, who is like the recent version of Rosicky — too bad, both will be deeply missed)... in their places we need to bring in some proven performers with no history of injuries... up front, although I do like the possibilities that a player like Lacazette presents, the fact that we had to wait so many years to acquire some true quality at the striker position falls once again squarely at the feet of Wenger... this issue highlights the ultimate scam being perpetrated by this club since the arrival of Kroenke: pretend your a small market club when it comes to making purchases but milk your fans like a big market club when it comes to ticket prices and merchandising... I believe the reason why Wenger hasn't pursued someone of Henry's quality, minus a fairly inexpensive RVP, was that he knew that they would demand players of a similar ilk to be brought on board and that wasn't possible when the business model was that of a «selling» club... does it really make sense that we could only make a cheeky bid for Suarez, or that we couldn't get Higuain over the line when he was being offered up for half the price he eventually went to Juve for, or that we've only paid any interest to strikers who were clearly not going to press their current teams to let them go to Arsenal like Benzema or Cavani... just part of the facade that finally came crashing down when Sanchez finally called their bluff... the fact remains that no one wants to win more than Sanchez, including Wenger, and although I don't agree with everything that he has done off the field, I would much rather have Alexis front and center than a manager who has clearly bought into the Kroenke model in large part due to the fact that his enormous ego suggests that only he could accomplish great things without breaking the bank... unfortunately that isn't possible anymore as the game has changed quite dramatically in the last 15 years, which has left a largely complacent and complicit Wenger on the outside looking in... so don't blame those players who demanded more and were left wanting... don't blame those fans who have tried desperately to raise awareness for several years when cracks began to appear... place the blame at the feet of those who were well aware all along of the potential pitfalls of just such a plan but continued to follow it even when it was no longer a financial necessity, like it ever really was...

I ve just read last article on Bale, and some of fans think he isnt worth money, LOL if we had Bale this season i am sure we would be first, not Chelsea, and if you think other big teams wont spend then start preapering 4th place trophy for next year, we are 3rd team, so we need to spend more than city or chelsea to even balance our squad with theirs, now imagine if any of them gets Bale, Aguerro and Bale, or Hazard and Bale, means bye bye EPL for many years!!!

This is also interesting due to if it works, if so then it means we may not need to buy a GK for a decade, this could mean a big signing is worth it... Spend big on Oblak now and if he works for us then he could be our number 1 for the next 7 - 10 years.

What does it means by to spend big in the January transfer window?

Pep will buy who he wants and I mean whoever he wants and you have Chelsea who will spend big as will Liverpool and so on.

That could mean more big money spent in the transfer market this summer.

It's also mean, that we are not going to sign him because we ain't spend big money on Xhaka for nothing, not to mention Coquelin presence.

However, the over-whelming success for Barcelona recently has meant this rule has now kind of become exempt in a city where fans are accustomed to success and with two defeats on the bounce to Manchester United and Chivas, Barcelona boss Pepe Guardiola now faces a balancing act if he wishes his players to be ready for their opening away clash against big spending Malaga on the 21st August.