Sentences with phrase «mean the same thing at»

For those not up to speed with these teaching philosophies, they all appear to mean the same thing at a quick glance.

They developed the equations to mean the same thing at each consumer - reporting agency.

The scoring companies designed the rating systems to mean the same thing at each of the big three bureaus.

Can it mean the same thing at every stage of our lives?

Not exact matches

Patricia G. Greene, a professor of entrepreneurship at Babson College, points out that «retirement» may not mean the same thing to small business owners as it does to people who have spent their lives working for other people.

At the same time the new technologies - notably the combination of mobile and Internet of Things - means that the really smart cities can create an experience for their citizens that saves energy and reduces the stress of traditional urban living.

For employees used to glowing performance reviews, an average rating (meaning they are working at the same level as their co-workers) can be «the worst thing that ever happened in their career,» Don Faul, Facebook's former president of online operations, told the Journal.

The same is true with stress at work - you don't want it to paralyze you in everyday tasks, but before a big presentation or interview, stress is a good thing; it means you care.

«Driverless,» «autonomous,» and «self - driving» all mean pretty much the same thing: a vehicle that can drive itself with no human intervention required, at least under some circumstances.

«Now when I ask the same thing, my students look at me funny, saying «Professor, what do you mean?»»

What this means is that it's difficult for Apple to do many things at the same time.

Either they necessitate a deceptive «God», e.g. creating starlight «in transit» which means that for some light the star that supposedly sent said light would never have actually existed, or they would cause effect that should be evident but are not, e.g. temporarily fast starlight would effectively cook many things, such as life on earth, if the required light (and attendant gamma radiation) were compressed into a significantly shorter time frame (think of the radiation from the apparent 13 billion years of the universe arriving at the same time, or even over a 1000 years).

When they speak of overseas, mission, they do not mean at all the same thing as evangelicals who use these terms.

I do not believe our modern bibles handle the translation correctly and same sex orientation (approximately 90 % of the population at any given time) was never meant to be identified as a sinful thing in the first place.

This means, among other things, that the cross safeguards both secularization and religiousness; it leaves room for self - realization at the same time that it invites imitation of Christ.

It literally means «two - souled»: a bigamist, a person with two loves, a person serving two masters, loving spiritual and worldly things at the same time.

Now if it could be shown that Whitehead means the same thing by «event» that he means by «enduring object,» then Cobb would have his point, but (a) there are no grounds I can find at all to ground such an equivalence, and (b) quite to the contrary, «events» can be, though they need not be, spatially extended.

Thus both the enlargement and the narrowing of the sphere of freedom are strangely interdependent, because such things as technology, automation and the development of social relations which enlarge the sphere of freedom at the same time also furnish the means to restrict it.

Consequently, if metaphysics can be established at all, it is only as a transcendental metaphysics, whose concepts and assertions are all purely formal and literal, rather than analogical, in the sense that they apply to all the different things within any single logical type whose meaning they explicate, not in different senses, but rather in the same sense.

I agree that my definition of «myth» is open to misunderstanding, but at the same time I am convinced that it is more satisfactory than the alternative you suggest («By «mythological» we mean the presentation of unobservable realities in terms of observable phenomena») For one thing, «observable» may prove too narrow a term and «unobservable» too broad, since all spiritual attitudes are unobservable.

I can understand what you mean by the term you use and at the same time can have a different definition for that term and we can still hold a conversation about the thing in question.

Aquinas has made the mistake of inverting the relation: «the divine knowing is creative and hence not at all the same thing as human knowing... Thomas thinks it has, however, an analogically common meaning.

To make this point, Pope Francis appeals here in this address and elsewhere to John XXIII's words at Vatican II, Gaudet Mater Ecclesia: «For the deposit of faith, the truths contained in our sacred teaching, are one thing; the mode in which they are expressed, but with the same meaning and the same judgment [eodem sensu eademque sententia], is another thing.»

But I am beginning to gather from statements in Muray's paper — such as that Hauerwas thinks «there is an unchanging core to the tradition» (86), which he means as a criticism — that Muray's anti-essentialism affirms that in fact there is nothing very definite to Christianity at all, meaning, I should think, that it is either everything or nothing — which in the end comes to the same thing.

I was talking to a person if he went to church and he stated all they want is your money.You got to give your money to read books about GOD, I mean like thirty dollars and more and the same for a dvd or like if you could give 1,000 or more to keep on the air.He and I both think we are better off stay at home and read the Bible and study it.I think if you are born with the new sperit of GOD you will understand the Bible without the loss of great somes of money.After they sell so many dvds it becomes 100 % profit and they never lower the price so can obtain one.For this is wrong, it states in the Bible that this would happen preachers for money to learn about everyones GOD.They forgot one thing JESUS never forced money from you to hear the wordof salvation Im a follower of JESUS CHRIST OUR LORD He is the way.Im not a so called Christian just.

Now, it doesn't mean it can be all those things at the same time.

I mean, day after day the same thing comes at you and after a little while you get bored.

The same thing happened in his first stint at Stamford Bridge, so Arsenal need to make sure that daylight does not appear between us and that means we have to go all out for the victory over Liverpool at Anfield.

On recent form not many Arsenal players would get into many top teams but when they are in form they would, we can say the same thing about other teams as well... Doesn't mean the players are not goof enough at all... Just not good enough in current form.

Just because we beat them away convincingly doesn't mean we will do the same thing at home.

He is not a quality striker because he makes a lot of mistakes in his game.The fact that he scores 20 goals does not mean he is a quality back up striker.It is one thing to be a goal scorer and another thing to be a good or average player.Goal scoring is a very important aspect of a player but not the only aspect.Trust me you can score 20 goals in all competitions and still be average.If Chamakh, Gervinho and all the so called flops scored this same goals they would still have been considered not good enough for Arsenal.His game is just not good enough and I for one believe even if no one believes that we can get a backup striker who is better than him and also a top centre forward.Its all about mentality and willingness.Forget his goals and look at his game or else you'll force me to bring up strikers in the world who have scored his same goals and are even considered terrible.

Time for some brutal honesty... this team, as it stands, is in no better position to compete next season than they were 12 months ago, minus the fact that some fans have been easily snowed by the acquisition of Lacazette, the free transfer LB and the release of Sanogo... if you look at the facts carefully you will see a team that still has far more questions than answers... to better show what I mean by this statement I will briefly discuss the current state of affairs on a position - by - position basis... in goal we have 4 potential candidates, but in reality we have only 1 option with any real future and somehow he's the only one we have actively tried to get rid of for years because he and his father were a little too involved on social media and he got caught smoking (funny how people still defend Wiltshire under the same and far worse circumstances)... you would think we would want to keep any goaltender that Juventus had interest in, as they seem to have a pretty good history when it comes to that position... as far as the defenders on our current roster there are only a few individuals whom have the skill and / or youth worthy of our time and / or investment, as such we should get rid of anyone who doesn't meet those simple requirements, which means we should get rid of DeBouchy, Gibbs, Gabriel, Mertz and loan out Chambers to see if last seasons foray with Middlesborough was an anomaly or a prediction of things to come... some fans have lamented wildly about the return of Mertz to the starting lineup due to his FA Cup performance but these sort of pie in the sky meanderings are indicative of what's wrong with this club and it's wishy - washy fan - base... in addition to these moves the club should aggressively pursue the acquisition of dominant and mobile CB to stabilize an all too fragile defensive group that has self - destructed on numerous occasions over the past 5 seasons... moving forward and building on our need to re-establish our once dominant presence throughout the middle of the park we need to target a CDM then do whatever it takes to get that player into the fold without any of the usual nickel and diming we have become famous for (this kind of ruthless haggling has cost us numerous special players and certainly can't help make the player in question feel good about the way their future potential employer feels about them)... in order for us to become dominant again we need to be strong up the middle again from Goalkeeper to CB to DM to ACM to striker, like we did in our most glorious years before and during Wenger's reign... with this in mind, if we want Ozil to be that dominant attacking midfielder we can't keep leaving him exposed to constant ridicule about his lack of defensive prowess and provide him with the proper players in the final third... he was never a good defensive player in Real or with the German National squad and they certainly didn't suffer as a result of his presence on the pitch... as for the rest of the midfield the blame falls squarely in the hands of Wenger and Gazidis, the fact that Ramsey, Ox, Sanchez and even Ozil were allowed to regularly start when none of the aforementioned had more than a year left under contract is criminal for a club of this size and financial might... the fact that we could find money for Walcott and Xhaka, who weren't even guaranteed starters, means that our whole business model needs a complete overhaul... for me it's time to get rid of some serious deadweight, even if it means selling them below what you believe their market value is just to simply right this ship and change the stagnant culture that currently exists... this means saying goodbye to Wiltshire, Elneny, Carzola, Walcott and Ramsey... everyone, minus Elneny, have spent just as much time on the training table as on the field of play, which would be manageable if they weren't so inconsistent from a performance standpoint (excluding Carzola, who is like the recent version of Rosicky — too bad, both will be deeply missed)... in their places we need to bring in some proven performers with no history of injuries... up front, although I do like the possibilities that a player like Lacazette presents, the fact that we had to wait so many years to acquire some true quality at the striker position falls once again squarely at the feet of Wenger... this issue highlights the ultimate scam being perpetrated by this club since the arrival of Kroenke: pretend your a small market club when it comes to making purchases but milk your fans like a big market club when it comes to ticket prices and merchandising... I believe the reason why Wenger hasn't pursued someone of Henry's quality, minus a fairly inexpensive RVP, was that he knew that they would demand players of a similar ilk to be brought on board and that wasn't possible when the business model was that of a «selling» club... does it really make sense that we could only make a cheeky bid for Suarez, or that we couldn't get Higuain over the line when he was being offered up for half the price he eventually went to Juve for, or that we've only paid any interest to strikers who were clearly not going to press their current teams to let them go to Arsenal like Benzema or Cavani... just part of the facade that finally came crashing down when Sanchez finally called their bluff... the fact remains that no one wants to win more than Sanchez, including Wenger, and although I don't agree with everything that he has done off the field, I would much rather have Alexis front and center than a manager who has clearly bought into the Kroenke model in large part due to the fact that his enormous ego suggests that only he could accomplish great things without breaking the bank... unfortunately that isn't possible anymore as the game has changed quite dramatically in the last 15 years, which has left a largely complacent and complicit Wenger on the outside looking in... so don't blame those players who demanded more and were left wanting... don't blame those fans who have tried desperately to raise awareness for several years when cracks began to appear... place the blame at the feet of those who were well aware all along of the potential pitfalls of just such a plan but continued to follow it even when it was no longer a financial necessity, like it ever really was...

Because, yeah, it is helpful to know what's supposed to be happening when in a general sense so you can have realistic expectations (I remember thinking that a one - year - old could probably speak in complete sentences back before I had one of my own), but at the same time kids are so varied and variable that you can really make yourself worry over things that don't mean anything.

So that part was easy for me because then feeding for her became an easy thing, and honestly I'm looking forward to the freedom, you know, I mean we took a little day trip last week to a botanical garden an hour away, and I had to pump on the way there and the way back, just so that I wouldn't be pumping when we got home so that I could put her to bed, you know, because it just doesn't, you can't pump and do something else at the same time.

«Babies naturally wake up two to six times a night, which means that whatever you're doing to get them to sleep at bedtime, you'll need to do that same thing whenever he stirs,» says Parents advisor Jodi Mindell, Ph.D., author of Sleeping Through the Night.

But at the same time, you don't want to overdo it either, because the body is only meant to handle and process so much — even when it comes to healthy things.

And Derek Draper and Damian McBride have been creating it in large quantities, and they're by no means the first or the most obvious examples, given the loans - for - peerages scandal, various bits of chicanery around the Iraq war and subsequent investigations (e.g. David Kelly), ministerial expense fraud (or at least it would be fraud if you or I tried the same thing on our tax returns), pretty much anything to do with Peter Mandelson and the various leaks, briefings and spin cycles that have characterised the Labour party for the last fifteen years.

(And while I understand your position on anonymous sources — it furthers your own poltical agend... sorry, I mean it's the ethical thing to do — could you at least number them so we know if the shadow cabinet member who told you things is the same one as last time, or a different one.

And taking part in social action — things like campaigning, fund - raising and volunteering in health and social care - means young people benefit at the same time as improving the lives of others.

There was a representative of Cargill at the meeting and they seemed to get it, but the other big food producers, it's not clear to me that they really understand that this is something that they need to worry about; I mean, they produce so much food overseas that if [they're] not taking it seriously and hoping that things remain the same, then I think they are setting themselves up for a real potential disaster.

«Binocular vision requires eyes set slightly apart that have overlapping fields of view, meaning the same eye sees the same thing at the same time from a slightly different perspective,» Loewen explained.

This explains why friends will reach for phrases like The same thing happened to me and I know just what you mean, Deborah Tannen, Ph.D., a professor of linguistics at Georgetown University and the author of last year's You're the Only One I Can Tell: Inside the Language of Women's Friendships, tells Health.

Evan Brand: But at the same time, the world is a different place, meaning that there's more toxins and there's more things that people have to react to.

I mean if your eating a healthy diet anyways, you might not need super amounts of carotene for added protection and there's other things in veggies that are good for you besides carotene which is why I'm still eating them, but at the same time hoping not eating any added fat will help with high carotene / yellow tone factor.

Just because you eventually get all of the amino acids that you need on a plant based diet does not necessarily mean that getting them all at once * in the same molecule * (assuming I understand this correctly) is a good thing or has the same effect on the liver.

The word tone can mean 10 different things to 10 different people, but I think at the end of the day what most people are referring to is losing fat in the area and gaining muscle, so the body part stays roughly the same size but improves in shape and definition.

Dear Lindsey, I am also amazed by the number 2, but not surprised at all... I had a blog (same name, another platform) where I posted quite a lot, but travelling and doing things — it means, living — started to prevent me to post like before.

Dating sites are also not very good at having policies which address this meaning that the same bloke can stick around on a long term dating site, showing all the right things and convincing women in succession that he's definitely interested in a relationship and then jumping right back on the site when he gets bored.

By all means have a go at online dating, but at the same time get involved in enjoyable activities where you may find someone who enjoys the same things, be open to new friendships at work or socially, be friendly and confident with yourself whatever you are doing.

However, at the same time, the best thing is that dating means opening yourself up to someone else and listening to them opening themselves up to you.