Sentences with phrase «mean the same thing for»

Being in science, I'm sure you are familar with the need to standardize terms to mean the same thing for all, especially if conducting empirical studies.

State Assembly Democrats warned Wednesday that reform for one county in the state easily could mean the same thing for any municipality.

The meaning of Amazon's sales rankings differs with each type of item you are researching (a sales rank of 10,000 doesn't mean the same thing for DVDs as it does for books).

Now the phrase «economically rational» does have utility in this respect — the first definition would mean the same thing for everyone — acting like an owner.

Without deposits, withdrawals mean the same thing for your «relationship account» as they do for your bank account.

Not exact matches

Patricia G. Greene, a professor of entrepreneurship at Babson College, points out that «retirement» may not mean the same thing to small business owners as it does to people who have spent their lives working for other people.

It means driving the same car for many years, buying good quality items that would last a long time, buying second hand products when it makes sense, simplifying your life so you don't own random crap, and not buying things for the sake of buying them.

At the same time the new technologies - notably the combination of mobile and Internet of Things - means that the really smart cities can create an experience for their citizens that saves energy and reduces the stress of traditional urban living.

For employees used to glowing performance reviews, an average rating (meaning they are working at the same level as their co-workers) can be «the worst thing that ever happened in their career,» Don Faul, Facebook's former president of online operations, told the Journal.

For example, «it's» means the same thing as «it is» except the second «i» is missing in the contraction.

What this means is that it's difficult for Apple to do many things at the same time.

Limiting things to only maths and science will mean you lose perspective on higher level functionality, for the same reason physics doesn't predict the outcome of a cricket match.

In other words, all things equal, costs for the same coverage on the same car was 32 % higher than the Texas mean.

Again, the mantra with property management for passive income is to take excellent care of a facility (meaning, fix things more often for the renters than you do for yourself) and expect the same in return.

Two things bother me, why jeopardize your children's security for this experiment, and why do it??? I mean everyone has doubts I their faith, but being a Christian raised by atheists, turning your back so publicly is the same as saying your faith was a joke... it is insulting to believers, a crisis of faith is normal in life, denouncing faith is shameful

Either they necessitate a deceptive «God», e.g. creating starlight «in transit» which means that for some light the star that supposedly sent said light would never have actually existed, or they would cause effect that should be evident but are not, e.g. temporarily fast starlight would effectively cook many things, such as life on earth, if the required light (and attendant gamma radiation) were compressed into a significantly shorter time frame (think of the radiation from the apparent 13 billion years of the universe arriving at the same time, or even over a 1000 years).

I am proud to say I believe in God, I did have the choice to belive or not to believe just as anyone else does, just because I choose to believe in something doesn't mean I have been brainwashed, I could say the same thing about you, but I won't, people can believe what they want to believe, I don't need anyone telling me what to believe, if I believe is because I have seen what He has done in my life and in other lives too, and that's more than enough for me to believe in Him.

Looking like Jesus means, among other things, that people will want to hang out with us for the same reasons they hung out with Jesus.

Just because Christ is shown doing or being certain things for the church in the Ephesians 5:21 - 33 text, does not mean that husbands are to do or be each of those same things for their wives.

Now we can both agree that «Atheism is not healthy for children and other living things» is a moron oops but you are one in the same... so that mean you're a moron too.

But these two words don't mean the same thing... My prayer for this book is that it will revive a generation of evangelicals to become true evangelicals instead of just soterians.»

I read that sentence as «I'm 20 and I was seeking for which religion God was real,» which meant almost the same thing, but with significant differences and implications.

Can the struggle for justice and belief in God come to mean one and the same thing?

«Sinner» and «Gentile sinner» were by no means the same thing; a Jew who sinned could hope for mercy from his heavenly Father, but a Gentile could not count God as his Father in the same way.

With these pastors, priest, popes, and elders all lying to the people, misleading the flocks, as was prophesied they would in Ezekiel 20, Malachi 2, Jeremiah 23:1 - 5, we are all a lost generation of pestilence, greed, and poverty, and this is not old people, as taught to us in Isaiah 43:11,13 - 19; that this book gives us the past, present, and future of what is going on, then, and now, it's juxtapose, meaning one must «compare» what is going on today with what went on long ago, for it has not changed any, not a bit from how people went astray then, full of pride, and are doing the same thing now, calling it good, or right, prophesied in Malachi 3:13 - 15.

This means, among other things, that the cross safeguards both secularization and religiousness; it leaves room for self - realization at the same time that it invites imitation of Christ.

«Two plus two equals four» means exactly the same thing for a five - year - old kindergartner and a 55 - year - old Nobel Prize - winning economist.

Jeremy Myers, i think you are wrong and David is right, so many out there are preaching you can live any way you want and be right that Grace covers any sin, they really believe that, that is not what the bible says, God was very concerned about sin so much he sent Jesus his son to die on a cross for us, if we accept Jesus as our savor then we are to obey his commandments, not break them, we are to live a righteous and holy life as possible, the bible plainly list a whole list of things if we live in will not to to heaven unless we repent, if we die while in these sins, we will not go to heaven, what is the difference, between someone who said a prayer and someone who did not, and they are living the same way, none, i think, if we are truly saved it should be hard to do these things let alone live and do them everyday, i would be afraid to tell people that it does not matte grace covers their sins, i really think it is the slip ups that we are convicted of by the Holy Spirit and we ask for forgivness, how can anyones heart be right with God and they have sex all the time out of marriage, lie, break every commandment of God, i don't think this is meaning grace covers those sins, until they repent and ask for forgiveness, a lot of people will end up in hell because preachers teach Grace the wrong way,, and those preachers will answer to God for leading these people the wrong way, not saying you are one of them, but be careful, everything we teach or preach must line up with the word of God, God hates sin,

For the deposit itself of Faith, or the truths which are contained in our venerable doctrine, is one thing, and the way (modus) in which the same are set forth, with however the same sense and the same meaning, is another.

In that spirit, then, Dionysius could affirm that love, as applied to the Godhead, «means a faculty of unifying and conjoining and of producing a special commingling together in the Beautiful and Good... and holds together things of the same order by a mutual connection, and moves the highest to take thought for those below and fixes the inferior in a state which seeks the higher.»

The church — every gathering of the church, everywhere, under every form — remembers that on a certain night its Founder said and did certain definite things, briefly reported: that on the same night he fell into the hands of his enemies; and that he suffered a violent death (for the broken body and the shed blood can mean nothing else).

The ethical framework for biological science must be based on the same principles of truth and meaning by which we as Christians judge all things, material and spiritual.

Rick i struggled for over 20 years as a christian in the end i said whats the point of struggling i feel powerless and useless so i gave in to sin that did nt work either but i was so sick of struggling and seeing the same results i became more miserable and even more powerless in my struggle with sin.I decided one day no more enough was enough i needed to get my life back in order.That was years ago and it was a process over 5 years that God dealt with all those things in my life that needed fixing most days i just said to him Lord i cant do this i just do nt have the strength and he said thats okay you cant do it anyway just trust me.So now now i l know what it means to be an overcomer in Christ sin does not have the victory over me anymore because Jesus is my strength in my weakness.I know i cant live a christian life in my strength but i certainly can with Christ in me he is my strength and in him i am an overcomer.If this is speaking to others just want to let you know that you to can be an overcomer you do nt have to struggle or battle with your walk or feel miserable because you give in to sin there is a better way.Just admit that you cant do it and ask for his help for the holy spirit is in you and he is the one who helps us in our weakness.regards brentnz

Concepts like guilt and conversion do not mean the same thing in Christian speech as they do in Hindu mysticism or in a clinic for psychoanalysis.

Go look up for yourselves secular studies on how much an average (this means typical, as opposed to your very ILLOGICAL use of anecdotal evidence to draw conclusions or simply spouting the same thing you read in a combox somewhere) Christian gives of his own time and treasure to charitable causes versus an average atheist.

For, surely, the same thing must then happen to them as happens to «consciousness» when, as he himself allows, «the word means no more than «experience» or «awareness» in the most noncommittal meaning» (1963, 4).

I agree that my definition of «myth» is open to misunderstanding, but at the same time I am convinced that it is more satisfactory than the alternative you suggest («By «mythological» we mean the presentation of unobservable realities in terms of observable phenomena») For one thing, «observable» may prove too narrow a term and «unobservable» too broad, since all spiritual attitudes are unobservable.

• «Theologians... are invited to seek continually for more suitable ways of communicating doctrine to the men of their times; for the deposit of Faith or the truths are one thing and the manner in which they are enunciated, in the same meaning and understanding, is another» (62).

It does not matter if we say Gott in German or Deus in Latin, or El in the Semitic languages or teotl in Mexican and so forth, though it is, of course, a very obscure and difficult question how we can know that all these different words mean the same thing or person, for in this case we can not simply point to a common experience of what is meant, independent of the term.

The same thing is true, I have ventured to say, of the actual empirical meaning of Christ for you and me.

I can understand what you mean by the term you use and at the same time can have a different definition for that term and we can still hold a conversation about the thing in question.

I simply mean that following the teachings of all the religious leaders do not end up being the same thing do not lead to the same implications for life on the planet in the years to come.

And just because we believe in a marriage of mutuality doesn't mean we also don't need a few tools in our toolbox for things like conflict resolution, finances, sex, romance, aging, navigating crisis or change, all of that same stuff because hello, we're all people with real stuff to deal with and marriage can be hard sometimes no matter what your theology is.

But the feeling is not only that, God made the women body to adapt to the men body, like a puzzle, if you force a piece to enter it will distort the image right it is the same things for your body, sex does not only mean baby, but it is only when you join with a compatible body that it is not a sin, God is the best doctor because he made your body, only he know the result in your body and he is also your Father, who's father do not want this child healthy or happy, or better the night thinks even if it is not your fault «why does my child as to suffer all this, and walk in the difficult road».

Instead when a person marries... he takes his sexual desire, and he does the same thing with it that we must all do with all our physical desires if we would make them means of worship — 1) he brings it into conformity to God's word; 2) he subordinates it to a higher pattern of love and care; 3) he transposes the music of physical pleasure into the music of spiritual worship, 4) he listens for the echoes of God's goodness in every nerve; 5) he seeks to double his pleasure by making her joy his joy; and 6) he gives thanks to God from the bottom of his heart because he knows and he feels that he never deserved one minute of this pleasure.

But for the rest of us, and for the Bush Administration in particular, the answer must involve the proper use of force to stop the cycle of violence» force and violence being by no means the same thing» from becoming established.

To make this point, Pope Francis appeals here in this address and elsewhere to John XXIII's words at Vatican II, Gaudet Mater Ecclesia: «For the deposit of faith, the truths contained in our sacred teaching, are one thing; the mode in which they are expressed, but with the same meaning and the same judgment [eodem sensu eademque sententia], is another thing.»

«To speak unqualifiedly of «our common love for God,» as if the Quran's Allah and the God and Father of our Lord Jesus Christ are one and the same, and as if what it means to «love God» in these two faiths means the same thing, is to say more than I am willing to grant,» he said.

I was talking to a person if he went to church and he stated all they want is your money.You got to give your money to read books about GOD, I mean like thirty dollars and more and the same for a dvd or like if you could give 1,000 or more to keep on the air.He and I both think we are better off stay at home and read the Bible and study it.I think if you are born with the new sperit of GOD you will understand the Bible without the loss of great somes of money.After they sell so many dvds it becomes 100 % profit and they never lower the price so can obtain one.For this is wrong, it states in the Bible that this would happen preachers for money to learn about everyones GOD.They forgot one thing JESUS never forced money from you to hear the wordof salvation Im a follower of JESUS CHRIST OUR LORD He is the way.Im not a so called Christian just.

I always thought the concept of mince pies was totally weird, I mean the name itself is terrible and very unappetizing, so for those of you that are thinking the same thing I totally understand your lack of enthusiasm for these little pies!