Concepts like guilt and conversion do not
mean the same thing in Christian speech as they do in Hindu mysticism or in a clinic for psychoanalysis.
As you point out, many English words in a religious context do not
mean the same thing in their original context... and sometimes not even in a modern non-religious context!
I always thought that a «çoach» and «tactician»
meant the same thing in footballing terms but after watching Wenger yesterday, I came to the conclusion that there is a difference.
Ask yourself if this will
mean the same thing in one, five, or 10 years.
But I know that doesn't
mean the same thing in all parts of the country!
It all means the same thing in terms of the heel.
In particular, these organizations wanted to ensure that «proficient»
meant the same thing in Mississippi as Massachusetts, and sought to reduce the huge proportion of people arriving at college or workplaces without the skills to succeed.
The retreat could crush Obama's vision of setting a uniformly high bar from coast to coast, so that that «proficient in reading»
means the same thing in California as it does in South Carolina.
It means the same thing in the car as in the living room, the same thing in the back yard as in front of the door, the same thing when you are alone at home as it does when guests come for a party.
I assume that «inventory controlled» and «capacity controlled»
mean the same thing in this context.
It is unsound to assume that because you know what a word means in one sentence of even the same document that it will
mean the same thing in a different sentence of that document (e.g. the word «significantly» has two different meanings when used in different sentences in Treas. Reg.
These do not
all mean the same thing in the many different English speaking jurisdictions, let alone all of the different French, Spanish, Thai etc. ones.
However, many words do not
mean the same thing in different contexts, nor will they all translate like for like.
If you put $ 10,000 in a savings account today, that same $ 10,000 won't
mean the same thing in 40 years.
Some people use other translations, particularly for the A, R and T in SMART, but essentially,
they all mean the same thing in terms of what overall is a SMART goal.
Not exact matches
For employees used to glowing performance reviews, an average rating (
meaning they are working at the
same level as their co-workers) can be «the worst
thing that ever happened
in their career,» Don Faul, Facebook's former president of online operations, told the Journal.
While indulging
in that plan to escape being overwhelmed can sometimes
mean completely checking out and detoxing from all
things «incoming» and tech - related, it can also
mean using those very
same thoughts and tasks to escape
in a different way — and still be using your mind.
The
same is true with stress at work - you don't want it to paralyze you
in everyday tasks, but before a big presentation or interview, stress is a good
thing; it
means you care.
For example, «it's»
means the
same thing as «it is» except the second «i» is missing
in the contraction.
In a niche market, success may not mean the same thing as in a consumer market.&raqu
In a niche market, success may not
mean the
same thing as
in a consumer market.&raqu
in a consumer market.»
In business, this
means that focusing on your competition is the
same thing as handing over your market share to them.
I can hire people with aspirations to make
things better — even if that
means a bit of chaos — and then my job is to generally make sure we're all going
in the
same direction.
It's the
same thing with bounce rate — a decent rate
means it shows up
in coveted positions, but a ridiculous bounce rate is less likely,» Kim said.
In this example, we're comparing two keywords that
mean the
same thing to see which one is more popular: «laptop» and «notebook».
In other words, all
things equal, costs for the
same coverage on the
same car was 32 % higher than the Texas
mean.
Again, the mantra with property management for passive income is to take excellent care of a facility (
meaning, fix
things more often for the renters than you do for yourself) and expect the
same in return.
Even if you're not able to enjoy the exact
same standard of living
in retirement as you had while you were working, there is one
thing you can do to make retirement enjoyable: find
meaning.
In more recent years, I've repeatedly seen the encouragement and value women have found in discovering the same things: the relief that following Christ doesn't mean forcing themselves into a box labelled «womanhood», which narrowly defines the life they should lead and sometimes restricts their gifts and callin
In more recent years, I've repeatedly seen the encouragement and value women have found
in discovering the same things: the relief that following Christ doesn't mean forcing themselves into a box labelled «womanhood», which narrowly defines the life they should lead and sometimes restricts their gifts and callin
in discovering the
same things: the relief that following Christ doesn't
mean forcing themselves into a box labelled «womanhood», which narrowly defines the life they should lead and sometimes restricts their gifts and calling.
Two
things bother me, why jeopardize your children's security for this experiment, and why do it??? I
mean everyone has doubts I their faith, but being a Christian raised by atheists, turning your back so publicly is the
same as saying your faith was a joke... it is insulting to believers, a crisis of faith is normal
in life, denouncing faith is shameful
Still, it may be worth pondering that
in this brave new world, those who uphold the old and much derided «gender binary» — or, to speak more properly, the ancient understanding that there is a real and normative difference between the sexes — will be the ones who can actually see some sort of
meaning, however misguided,
in things like
same - sex desire and gender dysphoria.
Does the fact that it says the
same thing in Deuteronomy
mean anything?
Either they necessitate a deceptive «God», e.g. creating starlight «
in transit» which
means that for some light the star that supposedly sent said light would never have actually existed, or they would cause effect that should be evident but are not, e.g. temporarily fast starlight would effectively cook many
things, such as life on earth, if the required light (and attendant gamma radiation) were compressed into a significantly shorter time frame (think of the radiation from the apparent 13 billion years of the universe arriving at the
same time, or even over a 1000 years).
I am proud to say I believe
in God, I did have the choice to belive or not to believe just as anyone else does, just because I choose to believe
in something doesn't
mean I have been brainwashed, I could say the
same thing about you, but I won't, people can believe what they want to believe, I don't need anyone telling me what to believe, if I believe is because I have seen what He has done
in my life and
in other lives too, and that's more than enough for me to believe
in Him.
Another fvcking idiot who doesn't know the scientific definition of «theory» and thinks it
means the
same thing it does
in casual conversation.
Being
in science, I'm sure you are familar with the need to standardize terms to
mean the
same thing for all, especially if conducting empirical studies.
If you still don't get it, I'll still be
in the Bible, they just won't call me «Christ», it will probably be the word «savior», which
means the
same thing.
I do not believe our modern bibles handle the translation correctly and
same sex orientation (approximately 90 % of the population at any given time) was never
meant to be identified as a sinful
thing in the first place.
Just because Christ is shown doing or being certain
things for the church
in the Ephesians 5:21 - 33 text, does not
mean that husbands are to do or be each of those
same things for their wives.
The
same lament appears
in Matthew's Gospel, but Jerusalem does not
mean the
same thing to him that it does to Luke.
Now we can both agree that «Atheism is not healthy for children and other living
things» is a moron oops but you are one
in the
same... so that
mean you're a moron too.
Can the struggle for justice and belief
in God come to
mean one and the
same thing?
Choosing non-conformity doesn't
mean we're all going to end up doing the
same thing, that we'll all find ourselves working
in a soup kitchen, or sleeping under a bridge.
These last two terms
mean basically the
same thing: that to marry creates a real legal relationship, with specific rights and obligations between a woman and a man:
in relation to each other, to society, and to God.
To exalt them, including the most purely «religious» intuitions, to some kind of absolute status, or, which is to do the
same thing, to assume that they are the
means of access to the ultimate, is to be involved
in ideology.
«Sinner» and «Gentile sinner» were by no
means the
same thing; a Jew who sinned could hope for mercy from his heavenly Father, but a Gentile could not count God as his Father
in the
same way.
With these pastors, priest, popes, and elders all lying to the people, misleading the flocks, as was prophesied they would
in Ezekiel 20, Malachi 2, Jeremiah 23:1 - 5, we are all a lost generation of pestilence, greed, and poverty, and this is not old people, as taught to us
in Isaiah 43:11,13 - 19; that this book gives us the past, present, and future of what is going on, then, and now, it's juxtapose,
meaning one must «compare» what is going on today with what went on long ago, for it has not changed any, not a bit from how people went astray then, full of pride, and are doing the
same thing now, calling it good, or right, prophesied
in Malachi 3:13 - 15.
In regards to words and language being fluid, that is my point when I state that while trust and faith may have common roots and share similarities, they do not mean the same thing right now in all circumstance
In regards to words and language being fluid, that is my point when I state that while trust and faith may have common roots and share similarities, they do not
mean the
same thing right now
in all circumstance
in all circumstances.
Jeremy Myers, i think you are wrong and David is right, so many out there are preaching you can live any way you want and be right that Grace covers any sin, they really believe that, that is not what the bible says, God was very concerned about sin so much he sent Jesus his son to die on a cross for us, if we accept Jesus as our savor then we are to obey his commandments, not break them, we are to live a righteous and holy life as possible, the bible plainly list a whole list of
things if we live
in will not to to heaven unless we repent, if we die while
in these sins, we will not go to heaven, what is the difference, between someone who said a prayer and someone who did not, and they are living the
same way, none, i think, if we are truly saved it should be hard to do these
things let alone live and do them everyday, i would be afraid to tell people that it does not matte grace covers their sins, i really think it is the slip ups that we are convicted of by the Holy Spirit and we ask for forgivness, how can anyones heart be right with God and they have sex all the time out of marriage, lie, break every commandment of God, i don't think this is
meaning grace covers those sins, until they repent and ask for forgiveness, a lot of people will end up
in hell because preachers teach Grace the wrong way,, and those preachers will answer to God for leading these people the wrong way, not saying you are one of them, but be careful, everything we teach or preach must line up with the word of God, God hates sin,
For the deposit itself of Faith, or the truths which are contained
in our venerable doctrine, is one
thing, and the way (modus)
in which the
same are set forth, with however the
same sense and the
same meaning, is another.
The values of
things are thus real, independent of the interpretation of them
in the
same sense that
things are independent by virtue of being harmonies of their conditional features with and by
means of their essential features.