Sentences with phrase «mean values +»

Data is presented as mean values + / — standard deviation.

For the experiments represented in Panels B — E, data are presented as mean values + / — standard deviation.

For the experiments represented in Panels C — F, data are presented as mean values + / — standard deviation.

For each condition tested, n = 3, and data are presented as mean values + / — standard deviation.

Not exact matches

In 2011, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration proposed rules to cap SPF values at SPF 50 + for that very reason, with EWG noting that FDA rules capping certain active ingredients mean that SPF 30 and SPF 100 products typically offer roughly the same amount of UVA protection.

Value per user If a bigger audience means greater opportunity for growth and monetization, then in theory, Facebook's (NASDAQ: FB) user base should be worth more than either Google's (NASDAQ: GOOGL) Google + or Twitter.

TLDR; in statistics, a mean value is meaningless unless you know the confidence interval for a given error probability (any poll saying that candidate Y will get X votes actually tells, in the fine print, something like «we are 95 % sure that the candidate will receive at least X-error votes and at most X + error votes»)

Because the SD of brain progranulin in wild - type mice was about 10 % of the mean level, progranulin levels in Grn + / − mice would need to increase from 50 % of normal to 80 % of normal, i.e. by 30 % of the normal value, to reach the lower limit of normal.

That means you get to choose a necklace, a bracelet, and earrings that speak to you ($ 100 + in value) Wahoo!

That means you can get the GLOSSYBOX Beauty boxed filled with luxury beauty products + the tarte lipsticks ($ 15 value) for ONLY $ 21 + Free Shipping (New customer / while the promo is LIVE)

That means you can get the GLOSSYBOX Beauty boxed filled with luxury beauty products + the lip gloss ($ 9 value) for ONLY $ 21 + Free Shipping (New customer / while the promo is LIVE)

Included in the PowerPoint: Macroeconomic Objectives (AS Level) a) Aggregate Demand (AD) and Aggregate Supply (AS) analysis - the shape and determinants of AD and AS curves; AD = C+I+G + (X-M)- the distinction between a movement along and a shift in AD and AS - the interaction of AD and AS and the determination of the level of output, prices and employment b) Inflation - the definition of inflation; degrees of inflation and the measurement of inflation; deflation and disinflation - the distinction between money values and real data - the cause of inflation (cost - push and demand - pull inflation)- the consequences of inflation c) Balance of payments - the components of the balance of payments accounts (using the IMF / OECD definition): current account; capital and financial account; balancing item - meaning of balance of payments equilibrium and disequilibrium - causes of balance of payments disequilibrium in each component of the accounts - consequences of balance of payments disequilibrium on domestic and external economy d) Exchange rates - definitions and measurement of exchange rates - nominal, real, trade - weighted exchange rates - the determination of exchange rates - floating, fixed, managed float - the factors underlying changes in exchange rates - the effects of changing exchange rates on the domestic and external economy using AD, Marshall - Lerner and J curve analysis - depreciation / appreciation - devaluation / revaluation e) The Terms of Trade - the measurement of the terms of trade - causes of the changes in the terms of trade - the impact of changes in the terms of trade f) Principles of Absolute and comparative advantage - the distinction between absolute and comparative advantage - free trade area, customs union, monetary union, full economic union - trade creation and trade diversion - the benefits of free trade, including the trading possibility curve g) Protectionism - the meaning of protectionism in the context of international trade - different methods of protection and their impact, for example, tariffs, import duties and quotas, export subsidies, embargoes, voluntary export restraints (VERs) and excessive administrative burdens («red tape»)- the arguments in favor of protectionism This PowerPoint is best used when using worksheets and activities to help reinforce the ideas talked about.

The Toyota RAV4 is an IIHS Top Safety Pick + selection, meaning it's one of the safest vehicles on the road, further making it one of the best SUV values on the market.

It just sucks from a value proposition standpoint - I think most CrackBerry readers, myself included, we're under the impression that the jump to 768 MB of RAM would mean a ~ 200 + megs of additional memory to take advantage of, and that's not the case.

That means you'd have to create an $ 89 + difference in value with the extra 0.1 x earnings rate in order to make up the value of the Citi Double Cash Card.

I consider anything within + / - 10 % of fair value to mean that the stock is fairly valued.

Meaning that if you travel to South America with groups of 4 + people, the AeroMexico Visa is probably the better value.

Also means CAD was + / - 10 % in value the past 5 years, and now in the past year its gone trough > 20 % almost like there is some bubble going on.

Notes Starting July 10, 2006 covered the following topics: It is about time..., Time and the Gordon Model, It is about time... continued, It is about time... more, The Copie Index, It is about time... number six, Compact Variable Terminal Value Rate Calculators, Orders of Magnitude, Using Stock Return Predictions, Eye Opening Calculations with Compact CVTVR L, New Standards for Financial Reporting, A Tip about my Yahoo Briefcase, Rational Pessimism and Tobin's q, Super Variable Terminal Value Rate SVTVR Calculators, What does «3 % + inflation» mean?

I felt the sentiment on RIM too; it used to be peaking at $ 150 + before 2008 slump, and by all means, when I bought it at $ 65 in 2009, all financial figures shows that RIM is indeed a value investing company.

That means that I pay extremely low interest on it (lower value of «RPI» and «Base Rate + 1 %») and that I only ever pay it out of my salary, and then only if I'm earning above some threshold (somewhere in # 15 - 20K pa, I think?).

That means you'd have to create an $ 89 + difference in value with the extra 0.1 x earnings rate in order to make up the value of the Citi Double Cash Card.

It also helps if it's a Category 4 (which means I can use my credit card's free night) or a Category 5 or 6 (which are good values for Points + Cash).

Our take: Unless you're already collecting Expedia + points, the Expedia + Card from Citi's lower earn rate and restrictive redemption program mean you can likely get more value from other travel rewards cards, especially if you have excellent credit.

That means the Perks + points are valued at $ 0.016, which is quite good for a no fee credit card.

Meaning that if you travel to South America with groups of 4 + people, the AeroMexico Visa is probably the better value.

After watching my starpoints grow very slowly @ 1 / $ on my SPG AMEX to a grand total 12K over 2 - 3 years (it means I spent $ 12K), I just decided to put them to good use and booked a one - night cash + points award that cost me 5K starpoints + US$ 75 at Sheraton Brussels Airport Hotel in a couple of weeks — a really great «value».

I agree that the value is very flexible and changes constantly but if you are able to compare «standard room» at x hotel during this time was y amount in 2012 and now it is y + z amount it means I need to give an extra z points today which means it has been devalued.

Whether linear or curvilinear correlations, and regardless of the regression method, or outlier elimination process for values in a data set + / - 3 s.d.'s from the mean, error analysis and going back to raw data are essential procedures.

If Michael Crichton's value of 0.8 degrees Celsius is taken with a range of + / - 2.2 degrees Celsius, it becomes a prediction of anything from a cooling of 1.4 degrees Celsius, to a warming of up to 3.0 degrees Celsius (with a mean value of warming of 0.8 degrees Celsius).

Thus, given the height and value of the emission temperature, we can get a simple estimate for the surface temperature: 255K + 5.5 km * 6K / km = 288K (= 15oC; close to the global mean estimated from observations given by NCDC of ~ 14oC).

You stated: «Thus, given the height and value of the emission temperature, we can get a simple estimate for the surface temperature: 255K + 5.5 km * 6K / km = 288K (= 15oC; close to the global mean estimated from observations given by NCDC of ~ 14oC).»

That is, the IPCC TAR has a mean value of 3.6 degrees Celsius increase, + / - 2.2 degrees Celsius.

NET Energy flow in / out of you body is En = Internally Generated Energy (Eg) + Ei — Eo where a + ve value means your body is gaining energy

The pH system is a logarithmic scale which means that the molar concentration of H +, protons or [H +], in the water is converted to its log value and given a negative sign, pH = - log [H +].

-- 1.87 is the clear - sky, or the all - sky annual mean infrared optical thickness; — if clear - sky, how the cloudless cases were selected out from the radiosonde data set; — if it is the clear + cloudy (all - sky), how did he get it as global average value, when the cloud infrared optical depth is infinite (in half of the cases); — if 1.87 is for all - sky, how much is the clear - sky value (if he got it).

Including all contributors, the individual Outlook values for September 2010 range from 1.0 to 5.6 million square kilometers, with a mean of 4.6 + / - 1.10 million square kilometers.

1a) A˜m, e = A˜m, SDOrt -LCB-[Cm (2m + Cm)-RSB- 2 + C1, m2 (L / a + Ro2a / L) 2m2 -RCB- 1/2, [S4] where A˜m, e and A˜m, SDOrt are, respectively, the mean +1 SD value of A˜m and the maximum value of A˜mOrt, over the 1980 — 2013 time range.

[S17] Then, on the strength of A˜m, b2 (y0) = 2v ′ m, b2 ¯ (y0), the latitudinal averaging of [S17] over the ΔQRA range results in the following estimate of the maximum allowable value, A˜m, b2 (ΔQRA), for the amplitude of the 15 - d - mean m component of the meridional velocity at the EBL over ΔQRA, A˜m, b2 (ΔQRA) = 2K4 -LSB-(K2 + l02 + l04) / (m / a) 2] 2K2l02u ¯ 02 〈 cos2l0 (y − y0) 〉 QRA, [S18] where 〈 X 〉 QRA stands for the latitudinal averaging of X over ΔQRA.

a Regressions of winter SLP and SAT trends upon the normalized leading PC of winter SLP trends in the CESM1 Large Ensemble, multiplied by two to correspond to a two standard deviation anomaly of the PC; b CESM1 ensemble - mean winter SLP and SAT trends; c b − a; d b + a. SAT in color shading (°C per 30 years) and SLP in contours (interval = 1 hPa per 30 years with negative values dashed).

Increasing concentrations of GHGs can cause more warming (+ or positive values), and vice-versa, decreasing means less warming or even cooling -LRB-- or negative values).

I mean, my gosh even the agreed upon value of about 0.7 C (+ / - 0.2 C) seems trivial when looking at paleoclimate data.

Temperatures have been rising since 1850 or so at a rate of 0.06 C per decade, with nearly all temperatures lying within + / - 0.25 C of the mean value.

The cash value of this is, that all of NASA's estimates of annual mean global surface temperatures come with an uncertainty of + / -(not less than 0.6) °C.

For CONUS for example the mean error from 1910 to 2010 is ~ + / - 0.2 C using monthly values.

That is obvious because over the past 50 years, the oceans appear to have gained 20 something raised to the 22nd power worth of Joules + / - 14.6 something raised to the 22nd power Joules, which is also assumed to be a huge number within a short time frame though we are not particularly sure what time frame is relevant, even though the impact of that 20 something raised to the 22nd power Joules produced roughly 0.09 C + / - 0.045 C increase in the mean value of the upper 2000 meters of the roughly 3600 meter deep oceans over the past 50 something years based on an imbalance estimate of 0.6Wm - 2 + / -0.4 which replaces the previous 0.9 + / - 0.15 Wm - 2 estimate which had a 95 % confidence level.

To not have the slightest idea would mean the value could range from + to — infinity.

If we are able to reduce the global average yearly temperature to a single value, a value that is accurate to + / -.1 degree C, over a period of 150 years and that indicates an increase of somewhat less than a degree C, what does that mean?

For platinum - tier plans, the value is 90 percent (with a de minimus range of + / -2, which will expand to +2 / -4 in 2018, meaning that a platinum plan in 2018 will have an actuarial value in the range of 86 percent to 92 percent).

The Pension Protection Act (PPA) allows for leverage (which simply means more value should you need LTC) and tax benefits for qualifying Life + LTC policies.