Seriously, equality doesn't
mean willful ignorance of the facts.
Not exact matches
And, if sin is the «
willful defiance» does that then
mean that
ignorance is bliss and all actions performed in absences of knowledge are inherently without sin?
So when I say «
willful ignorance», I
mean his willingness to admit he didn't know.
Buts its
mean - spirited anti-intellectualism arguable panders to Rupert Murdock's taste in journalism; for was it not Murdock, himself, who demonstrated that journalism could profit handsomely by hosting parasitically upon the corpulent body of
willful ignorance and intentional misinformation.
Sensibly, everyone's presumed to know the law: to have it otherwise would encourage
willful ignorance or claims of
ignorance as
means of evading legal consequences.