It's up to you what it will represent, but make sure you are both on the same page and make your intentions and
meaning clear when you give this gift.
Not exact matches
To be a truly collaborative leader and colleague, you need to be willing to get
clear on what collaboration
means for you and others, address non-collaborative behaviors
when you see them, and offer feedback
when you see someone making the positive changes you've requested to create a more collaborative environment.
So
when Williams took over the task, his job was to diffuse «the harsh past» and make it
clear that he'd do «whatever was reasonable to comply with the customer's requests,» which
meant, in this case, supplying backup documentation «10 times» over, he adds.
And finally, if your presentation itself isn't
clear, investors will ask clarifying questions such as «What exactly did Slide Three
mean when it talked about widget consumption per race track cylinder?»
This
means identifying your goals and being
clear when they're not being met, regardless of whether it may hurt someone's ego.
It
means making sure every one of those expenses is scrupulously documented, with
clear evidence as to where,
when and why the listed expenditure took place.
«It's
clear that the Kremlin will use any
means at its disposal to spread propaganda and misinformation, and we each bear some responsibility for exercising good judgment and a healthy amount of skepticism
when it comes to the things we read and spread on social media,» Warner said.
When the buying and selling decisions of millions of people or institutions interact to determine the value of a currency on any given day, it's not even
clear what «overvalued»
means.
That
means it has no
clear way to discern what is posturing by stockholders and what is any real discomfort with the terms — which could lead to an ill - informed underbid
when the price is set on Tuesday.
To me, it is unbelievable that people have attempted to predict the action of the most powerful bank in the world by deciphering the
meaning of one word
when the fundamentals are so very
clear?
It's not
clear what Fowler
means when she says Uber has named or blamed her for the account deletions the company has seen in the wake of her making her allegations public.
Eventually, it became
clear that Jones specifically
meant that Clinton's penis was crooked or bent
when erect.
This smaller update is
meant to improve user experience — users want to see the content they were looking for right away
when they click on a search result, and Google heard them loud and
clear.
When the Church speaks with
clear magisterial authority on questions undoubtedly within the compass of «faith and morals»» sexual ethics and the
meaning of marriage and procreation» the Catholic house divides one way.
Only
when we are
clear about our own patterns of life and belief will we be empowered to embrace the other without fear that this will
mean a loss of our traditions.
Yet it is
when I look at Sarah that the
meaning of Proverbs 31 becomes most
clear.
Yet
when one moves beyond such an initial comparison to the deeper level of
meaning, the underlying similarity becomes increasingly
clear.
The proper
meaning of the Church's teaching on this point becomes
clearer when one sees the official Latin text, which rather than «open» says, «perse destinatus», which refers to the objective status of the act per se.
The
meaning of this decision becomes
clearer when we consider further how Jesus» message of the Kingdom is related to the Jewish eschatological hopes.
Jesus gave so
clear a picture of what a life centered in the love of God and expressing itself in love for others would be that,
when the New Testament was written in Greek, the
meaning of agape was transformed.
Just to be
clear,
when I refer to genetics, I
mean DNA, something that has been proven to exist and pass on genetic information.
Then the ones that really want to come here can pursue that goal through legal
means, and if, and
when obtained, they will have a
clear conscience about being here.
A long time ago I came to the conclusion that if the
meaning of a verse was not
clear,
when translated into toki pona, then any doctrine based on that verse should be thrown out, on the grounds that if it is a core doctrine, it will survive translation into every known language, regardless of how ambigious the language is.
Aristotle gave this idea its
clearest expression
when he defined rhetoric as «the faculty of observing in any given case the available
means of persuasion» (Rhetoric 1.2.1355 b, 25
It is the reality of what is potential, in its character of a real component of what is actual» (PR 103; italics added), We need now a
clearer grasp of the nature of this potentiality and if we really understand what Whitehead
means in this last sentence,
when he refers to the character of this potentiality as «a real component of what is actual,» then we will understand the nature of the extensive continuum much more clearly.
In John 18:5 - 6 Jesus sais «I AM he» and The power of his declaration of BEING GOD brought them to their knees... This clearly coincides with Exodus 3
when God appeared to Moses and Declared that his NAME was «I AM who I AM» Do you REALLY think that that is not by design??? Is this not also a very
clear foreshadowing of the future (Romans 14:11, and Philliapians 2:10 - 11) Please oh please see how the Bible is so intricately intertwined and full of the The masters handiwork... Everything, all of life's questions are all within this book, not other sources, if one but will accept them, pray over them, and get the Lord's guidance... This is why I brought up 1 Cor 2:14, Which you took EXTREMELY out of context in the way I
meant it to be discerned, which the verse itself explains I might begrudgingly add... John 8:24 after he tells them I am not of this world.
Whatever may have been the actual course of events, historically speaking, which the New Testament
means to signify
when it speaks of the resurrection of Jesus Christ, it is at least
clear that it was the conviction of the New Testament writers, building on the testimony of the disciples after the crucifixion of Jesus — as it has been the continuing conviction of millions of Christian people since that time — that far from Jesus» being «put out of the way» by his death at the hands of the Roman authorities in Palestine, he was «let loose into the world.»
There is always a
clear, objective «biblical»
meaning when it's studied thoroughly in any given subject.
Doubtless a significant temptation to sloth or «accidie» — as this vice was called in older days — is to be found in the frustration a man experiences
when he has no
clear sense of his duties and no specific standard by
means of which to judge himself.
Only
when we understand the specific relationship between abstract entities, on the one hand, and material and mental entities on the other, as elaborated in his theory of objective idealism, does the true
meaning of the concluding chapter of The Idea of Nature become
clear.
You're certainly correct that we need to be
clear about the terms we are talking about, for example the first two «we's in this sentence refer to you and I specifically, or generally anyone who is engaging in a debate / discussion — but
when I said «If war is wrong, then it follows that we should never go to war» the «we»
meant Christians,
when I'm talking to you I agree that we are talking about what we as followers of Jesus should do, not just generally members of a given country or society should do.
When one examines how language is used, it is
clear that God - talk goes on and that for many people it has
meaning.
This
means that there develops a
clear substantive disagreement between Griffin and Ford as to how Whitehead was thinking
when he gave the Lowell Lectures.
Some of these are bound to work better than others (The Book of Exodus doesn't really lend itself to the sort of story Scott clearly wanted to tell), but the lesson to audiences is
clear: Just because a movie is about the Bible doesn't
mean you can know what to expect
when you sit down to watch it.
When it seemed
clear that he was expected to give a speech, he stood up and mentioned what we had discussed on our afternoon walk: that this was something of a historical event, the last of the old - style missionaries, and that to him it
meant that now the church was 100 per cent on its own for indigenous leadership.
However, it is
clear,
when scripture is viewed as scripture, plainly written, in a language that was
meant to be understood, in a manner that was clearly written, there are roles for men and roles for women.
This response was continuous, although the resurrection marked the crisis in its development — the moment
when loyalty to the person reached its climax and
when faith in the
meaning of the event as an act of God became for the first time
clear and sure — but at every stage this response was a constituent and creative element in the event itself, and the event had not fully happened until this response of faith had been fully made.
I didn't handle Jason's deconversion with the most grace, so
when he told me that he no longer believed in God, I asked him not to tell anyone for a while, but I was never really
clear with him that
when I was okay with it being public knowledge that I
meant that I wanted to be public about it as well.
What that
means becomes
clear only
when the question is raised as to the impulse and intention behind this particular mode of thought and speech.
When I describe myself as a «gay,» it is always
clear from the broader context that I am not using «gay» to
mean that I embrace and affirm my sexual desires in a way contrary to Catholic teaching.
But
when you recall that the word «baptism»
means «immersion into» or «overwhelmed by» or «fully identified with» then these passages become much more
clear.
When Father Whelan said he needed to step outside, that meant a cigar, but Father Driscoll was not a smoker, to our knowledge, so when I heard him making odd staccato sounds outside I figured he had a cold and was indeed trying to clear his thr
When Father Whelan said he needed to step outside, that
meant a cigar, but Father Driscoll was not a smoker, to our knowledge, so
when I heard him making odd staccato sounds outside I figured he had a cold and was indeed trying to clear his thr
when I heard him making odd staccato sounds outside I figured he had a cold and was indeed trying to
clear his throat.
But
when we recognize (as we saw in the post yesterday about the definition of baptism) that «baptism»
means «immersion into» or «identification with» some of the tricky passages in Scripture become much more
clear.
It is by no
means clear that this is much of an achievement, especially
when «people of color» is now but one category in an endless catalogue of victimizations and entitlements.
ut
when we understand the word baptism to
mean an immersion or a complete identification with something else, the statement becomes
clearer.
In reality, Greek thought always regards God in the last analysis as a part of the world or as identical with the world, even
when, or rather especially
when, He is held to be the origin and formative cosmic principle which lies beyond the world of phenomena For here, too, God and the world form a unity within the grasp of thought; the
meaning of the world becomes
clear in the idea of God.
We must first be
clear about what we
mean when we ask if Christians and Muslims worship the same God.
The gravity of our situation in regard to
means and ends becomes
clearer when we realize that the present combination of
means and ends is the worst of all possible combinations.
This
means, according to Allen and Swain, that «pastors may only bind the conscience of the Christian
when Holy Scripture so binds, through its
clear warrant or by good and necessary inference.»
The significance of love for knowledge becomes
clearer when we consider the
meaning of error and ignorance.