Even well -
meaning comments from the reviewers may prompt you to wail, «What?!»
SCULLY: Grant, prone to reading too much into innocuous, well -
meaning comments from his co-workers, is about to step in it here for no reason.
After all
the mean comments from family it was wonderful to hear from someone who supports my decision.
«
I mean the comment from the kids is that they are annoyed by it.
Not exact matches
«Ontario is the largest subnational debtor in the world,» Oliver proclaimed
from the
comment pages of the Financial Post at the end of December, as if that (unsupported) fact carried profound
meaning.
Huffman wrote that 70 percent of the suspicious accounts (662) had zero karma,
meaning no meaningful engagement (upvotes or downvotes)
from other users, while about one percent of the accounts (13) had a karma score of more than 10,000, indicating that they reached and interacted with many Reddit users by posting and
commenting on the site.
«The author of the EIU's report has told me that he did not
mean to suggest that Vancouver's fall
from grace was a result of the closures of the Malahat highway on Vancouver Island, though many have understandably interpreted it this way and
commented to this effect, both on this article and elsewhere.
Tebele does what he calls «curating,»
meaning he'll re-post content
from other social media users, and credit them in the
comments section of the app.
One of the most well - established ways to hear
from readers, the NYT public editor pointed out — although not the only one, by any
means — is through
comments on news stories.
Jeffrey Rosenberg explains why recent
comments from the U.S. central bank makes a September liftoff look all the more likely and what this
means for the broader bond market and the price of gold.
Any way thanks I am sure you
meant to say it when you
commented but some thing held you back
from saying it, just wonder what it was that held you back
from saying it...?
Paul Anderson - Walsh made the
comment after a report
from University College London said that pensioners with a sense of
meaning and purpose lived on average two years longer than those who didn't.
In the end, however, he's probably no worse than this reporter
from the Atlanta paper, for whom «unavailable for
comment» seems to
mean «not sitting next to me while I was writing the story.»
that would
mean that all of you have relevance apart
from the witty
comments you can generate on cnn's webiste - and may even awaken you to the reality that this world is just a prelude to something much better.
It is no wonder that many turn away
from Christianity, for your
comments are often
mean and spiteful, rather than following the apostle's Paul's words: «Let your words always be gracious, seasoned with salt, so that you will know how you should answer each person.»
One out of context
comment from an otherwise well spoken candidate, and the media goes all over it, while in the
mean time the same media convinces us the administration really thinks that Libya's assassination of our ambassador was over a YouTube video.
In order for any of your
comment to have
meaning to me, I would first have to accept that ANYTHING is capable of removing the Divine
from that which it has created.
Another
comment of your which bears examination is; «If God exists, and He created the universe, then He is the fountain
from which all value,
meaning, and ethics comes
from.
So when Kim shared a small piece of her own story about leaving the institutionalized church and connecting to a less traditional community of believers, I mixed the well -
meaning, thoughtful critiques in the
comment section with some of the messages I've been getting
from critics lately, and this is what I heard:
Well... I'm done reading your crappy reports and
comment sections CNN, you've successfully turned another educated person away, and what do you care honestly, every time you turn away someone who understands logic and reason, you bring in 10 more lowly people with degrees
from state college (I
mean, «yes, they're ph.ds, but
from state college??? that shouldn't really count, or at least should be considered the equivalent of a masters degree at a good school).
Apart
from the fact that Genesis says nothing (even remotely) of the sort, I would not presume to
comment on the Psalms, as I have not actually studied them, except to say that I v «aguely recall the translation of the word
from Hebrew to the English word «fool» is a corruption of the Hebrew term which actually
means (a person who is) «morally deficient», which might cast the statement in the psalm in a slightly different light.
I am tempted to pop in and see, in a month or two, just how many of the «countless people who don't dare
comment on this blog but would love to because of the
mean reaction they KNOW they will receive
from» Sam and I, will be blogging.
For instance you say you bear the scars of atheists, which
from your
comments you equate with communism, which
means You're close to or in China or Vietnam most likely?
i get letters every friggin day
from countless people who don't dare
comment on this blog but would love to because of the
mean reaction they KNOW they will receive
from you and sam.
I actually think a BIG problem with this whole discussion (and where most of the negative
comments are coming
from) is that we are all using the word «inspiration» but we
mean different things by it...
In his Presidential Address to the North American Patristic Society in 1994, Frederick W. Norris acknowledged that «some of the most interesting voices interpreting early Christian texts are Christian theologians
from Africa, Asia, and Latin America,» and that some of them «make historical
comments and acknowledge that their sense of what the texts
mean is formed by their present commitments and their membership in specific communities.»
Do you
mean to imply that Caryn in clearly
commenting from a position of faith is absurd in her conduct?
And in a sense this
comment is true: interpret the biblical verse or the brief narrative or in a couple of instances even the Old Testament book in isolation and it becomes in
meaning something totally different
from what was clearly its intent in context.
I assume that after you've finished insulting other posters, you will agree to be TAXED at a much HIGHER RATE in order to give all these poor people a dignified living, which I assume
from your
comments means free housing, free electricity, free hot water, a free bus pass or maybe even a car if public transporation is not available.
It appears
from Comments to my previous post that although Stegall is accusing various Free Grace writers and speakers of having a «Crossless Gospel,» what he really
means is that we have «Crossless evangelism.»
Rather than leave a blathering
comment on the useless nature of religion, you may want to consider the ultimate ends of holding on to a belief system (assuming atheism here) that can not sufficiently explain where
meaning, purpose or value (ethical right and wrong) could come
from.
Thanks for taking the time to come back and let us know —
comments from readers
mean a lot to us.
I
meant to reply to Maria who
commented on your recipe (
from veganhousewives) and said that they just tasted like flour and chips.
Not sure what you
mean by e-mailing it to you, as you
commented right
from the Taco Salad recipe page, and you can print it right
from there.
Just sent a
comment —
meant to add that I have successfully made bread bowls
from another recipe, and wanted to try the KAF recipe as I had just recently attended a traveling KAF class.
Just because I have been missing
from comments recently, doesn't
mean I'm not here, Nicole!
Although many will suggest that Robson has a personal vendetta of sorts aimed squarely at the Grinch who stole soccer, that doesn't make his words any less truthful... such tactics are nothing new... in the U.S.this business practice has become so common that even the players regularly use the media to manipulate public opinion (LeBron James did likewise to rally public support for himself and away
from his teammate, Kyrie Irving, who has asked to be traded)... whether for contract leverage or to rally support for or against certain players, this strategy can be incredibly effective at times, but when it misses the mark it can be dangerously divisive... for a close - to - the - vest team like Arsenal to use such nefarious
means to manufacture a wedge between the fans and it's best player (again), is absolutely despicable... for the sanctimonious higher - ups who demand that it's players adhere to a certain protocol regarding information deemed «in house» or else to intentionally spread «fake» news or to provide certain outlets with privileged information for such purposes is pretty low indeed... no moral high ground here, just a big club pretending to be a small club so that they can continue to pull the wool over the eyes of a dedicated, albeit somewhat naive, fan base... so not only does this club no give a shit about it's fans, this clearly shows that clubs primary interests aren't even soccer related... for all intent and purposes Kroenke doesn't care if we're a soccer club or a tampon factory as long as we continue to maximized his investment... stay woke people... great to see more and more people
commenting on the state of the franchise... this club needs to be held accountable for it's actions
Wenger made the
comment about keeping Gazidis on a leash and people assumed it
meant not spending as much, for me it is to stop him
from buying trash and clogging up the team with players not good enough for AFC, that leash worked well this year as we didn't panic buy a Perez.
I
mean, no and I'm not even sure how you got that
from the above
comment.
thanks for the sensible
comment fatboy yep i know i do get that they do nt really
mean it, but i just cant come to terms with that, i do nt really expect civilised culture in a sport but generally
from the people in the world, yep you are right about the real world, maybe thats the reason it annoys me extremely, i
mean look our world is rotten to the core, the human mindset is terrible when it faces danger or problems for himself, and maybe thats the reason i just want football to stay as just as an entertainment industry but when i see that people even here let the words flow in any kind of way just because the are frustrated, i really cant come to terms with it, i really love black humor and some akbs react angrily when some fans tell some wheelchair jokes or for example on the post
from admin where one could write jokes about wenger, some were really awesome, but when people cant control their emotion after a game and abuse other people it just irritates me as hell cause i really think that thats one of the big problems in the world..
The on -
comment issue is that almost universally, off - field
means off - football, and many people are trying to hindsight McDowell's football red flag into predicting non-football behavior by either falsely claiming he had non-football flags at draft time also or claiming that the line
from being lazy to reckless sporting is scouted logic instead of intuition that happened to fall correctly.
I have heard
comments from Thierry Henri that the tackles hefaced on the training ground
from Adams, Keown and Bould
meant he was less concerned by what he would face on match day I also listened to Joey Barton regarding discussions he had with Sol Campbell when they played together at Newcastle United.
I
mean I will dismiss the the
comments from Kelce, Nelson and Nacho because they clearly were put on the spot by the media, and you simply do nt throw teammates under the bus, especially game changers like Peters who just nabbed two interceptions.
That does not
mean that I agree with a so - called Arsenal fan having nothing but negative things to say about the Gunners, especially when it comes
from the smug mouth of Piers Morgan and seems to glorify our EPL rivals Man United and their insufferable manager Jose Mourinho, as Morgan's
comments reported by Metro have done.
In addition we should avoid any form of preemptive blogging, by which we
mean a
comment which is put up with the intention of invalidating an anticipated
comment from other bloggers with whom they disagree.
Wonder if that
means that Danny Rose is either further away
from coming back than expected or he may be in the dog house for his
comments during the transfer window?
After reading some of the judgemental, absolute almost
mean spirited
comments from * some * the anti CIO crowd, I feel I need to weigh in.
Comments like the ones you refer to are straw men
meant to take away
from the real weight (and truth) of your words.
This
comment really just
means the world to me and it comes
from Rebecca and she writes, «hello New Mommy Media team.
Viewers might not understand what he
means here, but readers of The Lunch Tray know
from Mike's
comment here last week that West Adams will be getting outside funding
from the Orfalea Foundations (just like Carpinteria High School) to train its workers in scratch cooking.