Sentences with phrase «meaning in context with»

The words of the closing song have duel meaning in context with the screenplay and also to what the creators of this movie have accomplished — «Who knows what miracles you can achieve, if you believe.»

There is a slight difference between the definition of a word and what it means in context with other words.

Not exact matches

In this context ethical «tone» means the mood or tenor that a leader sets with regard to choices between right and wrong, between more and less admirable forms of behaviour.

In this context, a competing business generally means any retail, wholesale, or merchandising business that sells products of the type sold by Walmart with annual revenues in excess of certain thresholdIn this context, a competing business generally means any retail, wholesale, or merchandising business that sells products of the type sold by Walmart with annual revenues in excess of certain thresholdin excess of certain thresholds.

What we are learning is that personal engagement does not mean just in the context of «with a sales representative» but with the multi-dimensional make up of the entire organization.

In the consumer context, this can mean that companies can effectively pick the pockets of thousands of customers, with no legal recourse.

While the nations of the world are united in fascination, and perhaps preoccupation, with cryptocurrencies — what they are, what they mean, and what to do about them — the United Nations is already using the blockchain to help people around the globe in a variety of humanitarian contexts.

Many say science is now woven together with ethics and religion in their minds; they can't think about biology without thinking about its meaning in the greater context.

That said, even with the latest research in neurobiology, I still have questions, and searches of meaning in some contexts, that I don't have answers for, and that... some kind of experience of divine... seems to work.

I do think that maintaining the normativity of Scripture entails giving it a higher priority than worship, if we are talking about our means of knowing the shape the Christian faith ought to take in the world, even if our primary encounter with Scripture is within the context of worship.

In Harper's, Kazin identifies «Arendt as a scholar who writes with deeply moving personal urgency about politics in its classic signification» when it meant no context for office or administration but the public realm in which alone, through action, man knew freedom.&raquIn Harper's, Kazin identifies «Arendt as a scholar who writes with deeply moving personal urgency about politics in its classic signification» when it meant no context for office or administration but the public realm in which alone, through action, man knew freedom.&raquin its classic signification» when it meant no context for office or administration but the public realm in which alone, through action, man knew freedom.&raquin which alone, through action, man knew freedom.»

What would «authentic» mean in this context if not consistent with what the Bible teaches?

This is to say that the core meaning of the word is necessarily under dispute - alternative visions of evangelicalism fill the word with such different content that its use in other contexts is confusing without consideration of that transformation of meaning.

In the present context this means pushing beyond current assumptions to changed life styles — but always with the wisdom of the serpent and the innocence of the dove,

In other words, the quote is being used within the context of a theological position and it means what they assert it to mean (or don't even bother to assert, but merely assume we should see) at least partially because of their presuppositions with which they come to the text.

For many, the word has nothing to do with a spiritual context... I embrace the term evangelical, if by that we mean a belief that we together can actually work for change in the world, caring for the environment, extending to the poor generosity and kindness, a hopeful outlook.

Although meant in somewhat of a different philosophical context, I find myself in agreement with Tertullian's question» What has Jerusalem to do with Athens?»

Abiding with Christ, or remaining with Him, is a prominent theme in John 14 - 17, and the first letter of John, and in both contexts it seems that to abide with Christ simply means to always be aware of His presence.

Peter's point is valid in the context, but I don't think we can say that just because God is not restricted by time, this means that God doesn't comprehend time, or that God doesn't care that we struggle with how long His plan takes.

It is questionable whether Whitehead would have ever introduced «God» to his metaphysics if he had not been convinced of the religious, i.e., non-metaphysical, meaning of the notion of God.2 Whitehead consciously developed his cosmology in the context of an «immediate comparison with the deliverances of religious experience» (RM 87).

Principles of interpretation (Hermeneutics) 1) Literal Principle — Scripture is to be understood in its natural, normal sense, read literally 2) Grammar Principle — Deal with what it says in the way it says it, be it using metaphor, simile, narrative, etc. 3) Historical Principle — Read the Bible in its historical context 4) Synthesis Principle — No one part of the Bible contradicts any other part (Scripture interprets Scripture) 5) Practical Principle — It contains a practical application 6) Illumination of the Holy Spirit — It is the job of the Holy Spirit to enlighten the child of God to the meaning of Scripture, without Him, one is without the ability to interpret Scripture

Burke recommends that the analysis of any written work should begin with the «principle of the concordance».21 The critic builds an index of significant terms: terms that recur in changing contexts, terms that occur at significant points in the narrative, terms that seem heavy with symbolic meaning.

Perhaps because he views history as the final context of all meaning, Pannenberg tends to begin any topic in the Systematic Theology with a brief history of its discussion.

(NB: In this context, «homosexual» means someone with dominantly same - sex desires, while «gay» refers to a person whose self - identity is determined by such desires.)

Third, the context has shifted: in contrast to the traditional Catholic conception of the political community, and politics within such communities, as the means of achieving real if limited justice for human life in the world, and a corresponding theory of international relations, recent Catholic thought on war often treats the state as a locus of injustice and the goals of particular states as inherently at odds with the achievement of common human goals, while an internationalism defined in terms of the United Nations system is proposed as the best means to those common goals.

In John 18:5 - 6 Jesus sais «I AM he» and The power of his declaration of BEING GOD brought them to their knees... This clearly coincides with Exodus 3 when God appeared to Moses and Declared that his NAME was «I AM who I AM» Do you REALLY think that that is not by design??? Is this not also a very clear foreshadowing of the future (Romans 14:11, and Philliapians 2:10 - 11) Please oh please see how the Bible is so intricately intertwined and full of the The masters handiwork... Everything, all of life's questions are all within this book, not other sources, if one but will accept them, pray over them, and get the Lord's guidance... This is why I brought up 1 Cor 2:14, Which you took EXTREMELY out of context in the way I meant it to be discerned, which the verse itself explains I might begrudgingly add... John 8:24 after he tells them I am not of this worlIn John 18:5 - 6 Jesus sais «I AM he» and The power of his declaration of BEING GOD brought them to their knees... This clearly coincides with Exodus 3 when God appeared to Moses and Declared that his NAME was «I AM who I AM» Do you REALLY think that that is not by design??? Is this not also a very clear foreshadowing of the future (Romans 14:11, and Philliapians 2:10 - 11) Please oh please see how the Bible is so intricately intertwined and full of the The masters handiwork... Everything, all of life's questions are all within this book, not other sources, if one but will accept them, pray over them, and get the Lord's guidance... This is why I brought up 1 Cor 2:14, Which you took EXTREMELY out of context in the way I meant it to be discerned, which the verse itself explains I might begrudgingly add... John 8:24 after he tells them I am not of this worlin the way I meant it to be discerned, which the verse itself explains I might begrudgingly add... John 8:24 after he tells them I am not of this world.

The cross is certainly a many - sided event and symbol, and contexts alter meanings; but in our context at least, I believe, it should be seen primarily, not as a divinely managed human sacrifice to a righteously wrathful God but as God's own solidarity with the creature and the decisive statement of One who would be «with us» unreservedly.

Well, one comment on Paul: The evidence is there that he endorsed the Lew Rockwell / Murray Rothbard strategy of allying with paleocons (meaning, in this context, redneck neoconfederates and such).

Hoefer 1979) says that the «rite has become a legal condition for the entry into the church which functions as a religious communal group; in this context it fails to convey its full meaning and purpose as the expression of or solidarity with the new humanity in Christ which transcends all communal or caste solidarities»; he also refers to the conclusion of Joseph Belcastro's book A New Testament Doctrine of Baptism for Today, that «the N.T. does not teach that baptism was a condition of salvation or church membership, but baptism was to be available for the disciples of the coming church....

ps - calling it a blessing is a little edgy but he clearly means that in a certain context and I think its fair for an entertainer to start the conversation with a statement that grabs your attention this way.

With a priori alienation (Verfremdung) from the text as the starting point, the intelligibility of mind, laboring in and through methodology, would transport the interpreter into the realm of another time and place and by the determination of meaning in relation to a specific historical context would illuminate the obscure text.

One of the greatest crises that the modern church has been polluted with, is the very little importance correct context (in its original meaning) has.

The Bible (especially the lyrical King James version) is full of useful phrases and metaphors — indeed, that may be its most valuable contribution to civilization — and the English language would be poorer by far if we were required to use them only with the meaning and in the context in which they were originally written.

The concept was then used by Plato, Aristotle and subsequent philosophers in a variety of contexts, with at times rather contrasting meanings.

Learning what these texts mean begins with seeing them in the context of the the flood, and the events leading up to the flood.

Anyone with a little bit of sense understands that in the context of Matthew 27:42, the word «save» does not mean escape from hell and entrance into heaven, or receiving eternal life.

But language is what the poet has to work with, and so the poet is forced to take sometimes exaggerated, sometimes extreme steps to pierce the mundane, breaking up lines, using words in odd new contexts, relying on sound effects and packing the stanzas with sensuous images and fragments from scripture, and the common language of faith suddenly takes on new meaning through these odd juxtapositions.

Just as it would be impossible to replace with definitions such words as» home,» or «light,» or «music,» or to make the meaning of such words clear to someone who had never himself experienced the realities to which they point, so it will always be impossible to replace with definitions such terms as «the grace of God in Christ,» «peace with God through our Lord Jesus Christ,» or the great story in which these phrases have their only possible context.

But the question of how to interpret the doctrine of the universality and unsurpassability of Christ in the context of inter-religious dialogue is now with us for good, and the fact that it will not go away means that we may be at least a little closer to an answer than we were before.

With the larger context now in view, you can narrow your focus and speculate on the meaning of the verse itself.

But in our context today where millions of people are in hunger and live in sub-human conditions on account of the unjust socioeconomic and political structures of our country, faith in Jesus Christ would mean to identify ourselves with the struggles of the poor and the oppressed for justice and liberation.

The best part about ancient partial out of context text in dead languages with the authors long dead is it can be made to mean a wide rage of sometimes contradicting meanings.

When Ferdinand Ebner says that «to speak of God except in a context of prayer is to take his name in vain» it means that to speak of him without yourself being in relationship with him, without seeking and finding again and again, is to talk vaporing nonsense.

This limitation in the meaning of «information» made it possible to develop a mathematical theory which is very useful in connection with transmission of messages along channels, but effectively mined it as a word which is useful to apply in wider contexts.

Perhaps it is only in an alien context that the Western mind can discover a meaning of «fact» which it can associate with Christ.

«9 Thus the «world of facts» with which the empirical sciences deal must be seen ultimately in another context — a context given meaning by religious symbols — which is beyond the scope of the empirical sciences.

«By acknowledging that all our readings are located in a cultural context and have certain prejudices, we understand that engaging with the Bible can never mean that we simply extract meaning from it, but also that we read meaning into it.

Once we set Jesus in the context of a larger scriptural story, however, and come to grips with his sense of what exactly the new the new covenant would mean and how it would both fulfill and transform the old one... we discover a much richer, and more narratival, sense of «fulfillment,» which generates that subtle and powerful view of scripture we find in the early church.»

''... I let God's Word speak to me, with the words having meaning according to the context of the language they were written in.

(In other words, I completely agree with having boundaries in the context you meanIn other words, I completely agree with having boundaries in the context you meanin the context you mean.)