Not exact matches
Others whose skill is more in communication to the
nonscientist can take it from here, but I found this a useful summary (PhD computer science, working with biologists, involved in Green politics — not illiterate but by no
means an expert).
The authors note that Oreskes» methodology is further flawed because it also surveyed the opinions and writings of «
nonscientists who may write about climate, but are by no
means experts on or even casually familiar with the science dealing with attribution — that is, attributing a specific climate effect (such as a temperature increase) to a specific cause (such as rising CO2 levels).»
The authors note that Oreskes» methodology is further flawed because it also surveyed the opinions and writings of «
nonscientists who may write about climate, but are by no
means experts on or even casually familiar with the science dealing with attribution — that is, attributing a specific climate effect (such as a temperature increase) to a specific cause (such as rising CO