Throughout the article, she uses examples to describe and illustrate how judicial voice is a powerful and important analytical tool that can aid legal readers in discovering
the meaning of judicial opinions.
Not exact matches
Application: Voice as Index
of Deeper Structures
of Meaning V. Conclusion I. Introduction When we read a
judicial opinion, does it «sound» in a distinctive and recognizable way?
But let's face it: limited
meaning or not, the «argle - bargles»
of our lexicon do have a way
of bringing
judicial opinions down to earth and livening them up, don't they?
First
of all, the Court was not convinced by the
Opinion of the Advocate General (AG) Jääskinen, who proposed that the
judicial review
of all decisions by the Petitions Committee must be precluded under Article 263 TFEU in so far as those decisions are not challengeable acts within the
meaning of that Article.
And I don't
mean that we can't read statutes,
judicial opinions, or briefs or represent clients based on all
of this information, but the volume
of the information being generated by lawyers, judges, legislators, etc. can no longer be found, digested, disseminated, or understood without software and algorithms.
Only Justice Cromwell has expressed a
judicial opinion on the
meaning of Resurfice in reported reasons for judgment.
First, it Summary E-memo assignments rely on the same underlying research sources as the larger assignment — which, in the first - year curriculum,
means predominantly
judicial opinions.39 Second, because the Summary E-memo involves the same legal issues as the larger assignment, the type
of legal reasoning involved mirrors the type
of legal reasoning required for the larger writing project.
In the first - year curriculum, this generally
means an IRAC - style analysis requiring the synthesis
of rules from various
judicial opinions and other sources, followed by an application
of those rules to a specific set
of facts.40