Sentences with phrase «meaning of contract language»

Not exact matches

Respecting the contract doesn't mean eliminating core initiatives because of concerns about contractual language.

For a district qualifying under this paragraph whose charter school tuition payments exceed 9 per cent of the school district's net school spending, the board shall only approve an application for the establishment of a commonwealth charter school if an applicant, or a provider with which an applicant proposes to contract, has a record of operating at least 1 school or similar program that demonstrates academic success and organizational viability and serves student populations similar to those the proposed school seeks to serve, from the following categories of students, those: (i) eligible for free lunch; (ii) eligible for reduced price lunch; (iii) that require special education; (iv) limited English - proficient of similar language proficiency level as measured by the Massachusetts English Proficiency Assessment examination; (v) sub-proficient, which shall mean students who have scored in the «needs improvement», «warning» or «failing» categories on the mathematics or English language arts exams of the Massachusetts Comprehensive Assessment System for 2 of the past 3 years or as defined by the department using a similar measurement; (vi) who are designated as at risk of dropping out of school based on predictors determined by the department; (vii) who have dropped out of school; or (viii) other at - risk students who should be targeted to eliminate achievement gaps among different groups of students.

Understanding what the sections and language of these documents mean, and avoiding signing a bad contract, is key to your career as a writer.

Of course, that means the authors have to start insisting on very definite language on what «in print» and «out of print» means in their contracts — and you can bet the publishers will kick and scream and thrown a tantrum a two year old would envy when more and more authors start throwing contracts back at them and telling them to take a hike until they come back with a more author - friendly contracOf course, that means the authors have to start insisting on very definite language on what «in print» and «out of print» means in their contracts — and you can bet the publishers will kick and scream and thrown a tantrum a two year old would envy when more and more authors start throwing contracts back at them and telling them to take a hike until they come back with a more author - friendly contracof print» means in their contracts — and you can bet the publishers will kick and scream and thrown a tantrum a two year old would envy when more and more authors start throwing contracts back at them and telling them to take a hike until they come back with a more author - friendly contract.

A thorough examination of the contract language may indicate that you are only renting the content, which would mean you have to pay the rent every year or risk losing all of your ebooks.

This means that you, the buyer with an FHA mortgage, can not be forced to follow through with the purchase in the event that the property does not appraise for at least the sales price, no matter what language the rest of the contract contains.

That inevitably means that while a Nordic law firm, or an inhouse legal team, can perhaps use an AI doc review system «out of the box» to explore English language contracts in a due diligence exercise, for example, moving onto Swedish legal documents will demand additional training.

By way of background, the test for contractual interpretation is what a reasonable person, having all background knowledge which would have been available to the parties, would understand the language in a contract to mean.

I think that machine learning natural language processing, I mean, I think, honestly, right now, it might take a lawyer let's say two hours to review a contract or whatever, if you can get a piece of software that does that in ten seconds, now that's disruptive.

To put this language in public law terms, the lack of procedural fairness in the termination decision meant that the decision could not reasonably be relied upon by other public authorities as evidence of unfitness to carry out public contracts.

The Court further confirmed that the courts must enforce the terms of freely negotiated employment contracts when the language and meaning is clear.

The Court interpreted that language to mean that the parties expected delivery of the contract to the other to be required for it to be binding.

The court must construe the plain and ordinary language within the meaning of the contract as a whole; and

There is no one uniform definition of occurrence, many definitions of when an occurrence takes place are not sufficiently precise to exclude either Gecko or NoState in this fact pattern, and generally speaking, there is a legal rule that interprets legal language in an insurance contract in favor of the insured to the extent that there is any doubt as to its meaning.

Lederman says that while lawyers drafting contracts will want to be more precise in the language of a contract, it doesn't mean they will ever be ironclad.

Stewart Title urged that the application judge erred, in turn, by: (i) failing to give effect to the clear meaning of the exception, and in finding ambiguity by looking at the word «paid» in isolation; (ii) «giving no weight to the factual matrix surrounding how the Policy language operates in practice and in its commercial context» when resolving the ambiguity; and (iii) resorting to contra proferentem reasoning before exhausting other methods of contract construction.

In its essence, Ethereum extended over the Bitcoin payment mean, by adding a rich programming language enabling the execution of smart contracts.

Signature Realty, Inc. v. Tallman (303 A.D. 2d 925)-- if there is any doubt or uncertainty as to the meaning of the disputed language in a brokerage agreement, all ambiguity must be resolved against the broker who prepared it; brokerage agreement was, as a matter of law, ambiguous with respect to the issue of whether broker would earn commissions when tenant exercised an option to renew the lease and therefore broker is not entitled to commissions on rental payments during any renewal term of the lease; broker not entitled to restitution in quasi-contract because there exists a valid and enforceable written contract governing the particular subject matter in dispute; dissenting opinion finds that the brokerage agreement is clear with respect to commissions earned and payable and that tenant was obligated to pay a commission to broker at the time the rental payment was due and owing to landlord, including during renewal terms of the lease.