On the other hand, if his desire was to change more than words, or to change them in some significant and deeper way, it is hard to see how he could have avoided changes in the sense and
meaning of the doctrines set forth.
The discussion, I hope, illustrates my major point that when you ask
the meaning of a doctrine or, in other words, what was the insight or truth of experience that those who formulated these doctrines wanted to safeguard, you find yourself grappling with them with concepts almost too difficult for words.
5 The word (Greek) which is usually translated «perfect» occurs fairly frequently in Paul's letters.6 The problem of the various forms of perfectionism in Christianity has been thoroughly analyzed in such works as Dr. Sangster's Path to Perfection, a study of John Wesley, and R. Newton Flews» The Idea of Perfection in Christian Theology.7
The meaning of this doctrine of perfection is one problem for Christian faith.
By
means of his doctrines of sociality and altruism Hartshorne believes that he destroys any possible basis for a self - defeating atomistic and solipsistic human individualism.
And whenever there has been a re-creation of that original life and experience in Christian history,
the meaning of the doctrine has been illuminated afresh.
The practical
meaning of this doctrine is what Jews and Christians can together bring into the public square.
This doctrine of radical freedom does not mean that every possible
meaning of the doctrine of predestination is negated.
An essential first step is to recover the core
meaning of the doctrine.
It also challenges
the meaning of doctrine, as we show that the vast majority of judicial work — almost 90 % of substantive orders, and 97 % of all judicial actions — are not fully reasoned, and are read only by the parties.
Case law shall complement the legal system by
means of the doctrine repeatedly upheld by the Supreme Court in its interpretation and application of statutes, customs and general legal principles.
Not exact matches
«A well established academic
doctrine argues that markets are efficient,
meaning that the price
of a stock fully incorporates all known information and judgement about that stock.
I
mean, there are some concrete ideas, but as for all the
doctrine that's been pounded into me, a lot
of that I still question.
This
means that we do best not to defend
doctrines as abstract truths but rather to testify to others by telling the story
of our own faith journey.
And, I do not
mean the Earth Religion, tree hugging, butterfly feelings, abortionists defending animal rights, kick the Bible out
of society morans finding peace in Bhuddism or any other false
doctrine.
It does
mean beyond cavil that Michael Novak has contributed significantly to the development
of Catholic social
doctrine at the highest level
of its teaching authority.
For the true claims
of Jews and Christians are based on the
doctrine of revelation, which
means that they are essentially the recipients
of a message about the world, one given to them from the only source who can see the world from the perspective
of transcendence — sub specie divinitatis.
The marks
of the Catholic church are: One - In
doctrine, sacraments, and head (the pope); Holy - its sacraments and teachings lead men to holiness; Universal -
meaning the same
doctrine and sacraments and head throughout the world; and Apostolic - can be directly traced to the Apostles and Jesus Christ.
At a meeting in the fall
of 1996, it was determined that further progress depended upon firm agreement on the
meaning of salvation, and especially the
doctrine of justification.
The covenant was not simply a piece
of paper affirming partnership no matter what, but instead a
means to secure the «robust accountability» and «gracious restraint» that characterize deep relationships rooted in mutual recognition
of catholic faith and order, grounded in creedal
doctrine, and answerable to the authoritative word
of Scripture.
They carried around the tablets
of the 10 commandments, you know... the covenent (hence the name ark
of the covenant), and it had as much
meaning to them as transsubstantiation does to good christians who, by
doctrine, have to believe they are legit eating and drinking christ, which is whackier in your opinion?
Here you begin to understand the
meaning of verses and creeds and
doctrines.
The only reason mormonism accepted blacks in the 70s was simply because
of a temple being built in Brazil, before discovering that many Brazilians were mixed with blacks which
meant according to their
doctrine they were unworthy to enter the temple.
1 Timothy 4:1 - 3 — But the Spirit explicitly says that in later times some will fall away from the faith, paying attention to deceitful spirits and
doctrines of demons, by
means of the hypocrisy
of liars seared in their own conscience as with a branding iron, men who forbid marriage and advocate abstaining from foods which God has created to be gratefully shared in by those who believe and know the truth.
The statement says that the book is incompatible with Catholic
doctrine on three crucial scores: Jesus Christ as the unique and universal Savior
of all; the salvific character
of non-Christian religions; and the Church as the ordinary
means of salvation.
That's what the
doctrine of the Sovereignty
of God
means.
Since Latter - day Saints believe in continuing, modern revelation, that
means that we follow what is in the canonized scriptures (Bible, Book
of Mormon,
Doctrine and Covenants, Pearl
of Great Price) AND whatever our current leaders teach.
The most simple
doctrine of Equality,
means equality for all.
It is, like all
of Calvinism's
doctrines, not explicitly taught anywhere in scripture, but extrapolated by taking a few verses or partial verses out
of context and granting them a
meaning never intended by the authors.
But the real linchpin in Calvinism is their
doctrine of total depravity, which actually
means «total inability.»
When someone is accused
of «cherry - picking» verses from the Bible, it
means that they have a particular
doctrine or idea they want to teach to others, and rather than considering «the whole counsel
of God,» they pick a choose a few select verses from various books
of the Bible which seems to prove their point or present their case in the strongest possible way.
Besides the fact that virtually no one in this country has ever been prohibited from saying «Merry Christmas» in the first place, such a sentiment stands in blasphemous contradiction to the very
doctrine of incarnation we are
meant to embrace this time
of year.
What Whitehead
means by physical or causal prehension is not a species
of perception in this sense, and it is not to he understood in terms
of the Neoplatonic
doctrine.
The
doctrine of the ascension may have been given bad press because
of its popular
meaning, which seems related to ideas like «ascending to the third floor,» and less often to «ascending to the place
of power.»
(Mt 16:17) Thus papal infallibility is effectively exercised when according to the «manifest
meaning and intention» (Vatican II, Constitution on the Church, n. 25)
of the teaching, the Pope invokes the authority
of Christ to confirm and define a traditional
doctrine of faith or morals.
Now, if you want to take your favourite sin and insert it into the
meaning, go ahead, but don't expect anybody to be fooled by your assertions and don't expect anybody to be convinced
of your
doctrine that you build on such a shaky foundation.
It brings to light the tangled hierarchy in their
doctrine and shows what their beliefs actually
mean using only the logical quantifiers
of propositional calculus, that either (Mormonism is FALSE or Women are DAMNED).
What total depravity is
meant to convey is the idea that sin has affected the whole person down to the very core or root
of his or her being (Boice & Ryken,
Doctrines of Grace, 71).
Thus papal infallibility is effectively exercised when according to the «manifest
meaning and intention» (Vatican II, Constitution on the Church, n. 25)
of the teaching, the Pope invokes the authority
of Christ to confirm and define a traditional
doctrine of faith or morals.
But what does this assertion
of internal relatedness
mean, particularly in light
of the fact that Whitehead tells us in Adventures
of Ideas (p. 157) that the traditional
doctrine of «internal relations is distorted by reason
of its description in terms
of language adapted to presuppositions
of the Newtonian type»?
As we explore the
meaning of Christ, we need to remember that no category
of thought, no picture
of Jesus, no
doctrine of Christ can fully apprehend him.
He seeks the essence
of an idea, a
doctrine, a point
of view; and when he finds it, he discards all the qualifications with which it is surrounded in order to elicit its pure and radical
meaning.
... In the Christian religion, theologians have argued, the
doctrine that in Jesus Christ God is present to men and that the Holy Spirit transforms the face
of the earth
means that men need not leave history to encounter the transcendent God» (p. 267).
The
doctrine of Inspiration creates a whole mass
of people who think the words themselves are God's Word, and so simply by quoting a verse, they are speaking the words
of God, even if they don't have a clue what the words
mean.
But to understand the primacy
of Christ and the novelty
of what it
means, we should first contrast with it the
doctrine that is more familiar.
This social
doctrine provided the alternative to the Marxist notion that revolution and the collectivizing
of the
means of the production would establish a just society in which charity is superfluous.
This fact
means that the task
of the
doctrine of analogy is not to justify such discourse but simply to describe and explain it.
The
doctrine that sexuality is a primary
means of communication bears upon our appraisal
of the new freedom
of sexual language and imagery in the literature and art
of our century.
We simply do not know what the
doctrines of atonement, incarnation and redemption
mean until we understand what they
mean for persons shaped by this historical milieu.
Since it is five steps away from atheism out
of a possible six, lovers
of the letter
of orthodoxy who might feel inclined to attack case two as little better than atheism, or as a blasphemous or at best a crudely inept
doctrine, might pause, before indulging in such judgment, long enough to consider — and I am confident they will not have done so before — what the five steps really
mean.
Nearly half a century on, in his wittily entitled Omnipotence and Other Theological Mistakes (1984), Hartshorne reviewed two
meanings of «all - powerful»: the traditional,
of course — the (benevolent) tyrant ideal
of absolute, all determining, irresistible power18 — and what he previously had identified as the greatest possible power in a universe
of multiple centers
of power: «The only livable
doctrine of divine power is that it influences all that happens but determines nothing in its concrete particularity.»