Sentences with phrase «meaning out of their reading»

She is most inspired when she is in the midst of children, teachers, coaches, and principals, making meaning out of their reading, writing and teaching lives.

Not exact matches

That means only around one out of every four people even open your email (let alone read or click any links in it).

One obvious way out of the lawsuit would be for Allergan to say «come on, Pershing Square, your reading of the poison pill is absurd, of course it doesn't mean that, why are you embarrassing yourself with this lawsuit?»

I meant non existent since no one knew how to read unless you were wealthy and why would they want to suppress this book that had the beliefs that kept the poor eating out of their hands.

Of course, you also have to understand that a student can't involve others without consent, meaning that they can not pray out loud, can not read their bible out loud, can not proselytize on school grounds, etc..

Most people like to see their content accessed widely and so can learn some great tips (as well as read some good content) from these blogs, but «most popular» doesn't always mean «best» I'd say that for any blogger a key to judging your own success is to think about the purpose and intended audience of you blog — if you have a niche audience in a specific location you may not get a huge following but if you set out to acheive something worthwhile through your blog and you achieve it then that counts as success.

Our book is meant t be suggestive only LOL God luck I have feeling AA will weather the hate as it has the last 75 + years and continue to reach out to those so desperately in need of sobriety for free LOL If you read this and want to get sober please try AA if it doesn't work for you find something that does.

We re-discover the meaning of heroism and friendship as we see the two hobbits clawing their way up Mount Doom; we see again the endless evil of greed and egotism in Gollum, stunted and ingrown out of moral shape by years of lust for the ring; we recognize again the essential anguish of seeing beautiful and frail things - innocence, early love, children — passing away as we read of the Lady Galadriel and the elves making the inevitable journey to the West.

I put this question out to some of my Rabbis Without Borders colleagues, and in addition to seconding the Bereshit Rabbah idea, they recommended Searching for Meaning in Midrash: Lessons for Everyday Living by Michael Katz and Gershon Schwartz and Reading the Book: Making the Bible a Timeless Text by Rabbi Burt Visotzky.

We experience God and revelation as perennially - unfolding, which means there's always room for new ways of understanding divinity and sacred text, especially when the old ways of understanding them (e.g. antiquated readings of Leviticus 18:22) turn out to be hurtful or to seem misguided.

When I, as a Baptist, or my sister, as a Catholic, reads the verse «this is my body,» a flood of opinions pour out as to the meaning of that text.

This is often our approach to liturgy and social life: we try to «read» the liturgy for symbols and meanings that we take out and apply in the «real world» — the offering means we should give of our wealth, the kiss of peace means we should seek peace in international relations, and so on.

All those within Torah Musa, Zabor Dawoud, Angeel Issa out of which brewed out of it the soul thing of pure faith that God was not not begotten, God is Single and not Plural, God has no Mistress, God has No Begotten Son, God may Chose Any as Sons from his creations with out need to beget sons through the means he created for mankind to increase population... All Prophets and Messengers spoke the Words of God as he put his words to their mouths... they were the words of God... Now please read with me the verses even if for general informations only;

I defy anyone to get that meaning out of the quotation, or rather I defy anyone to get that meaning out of it who does not read the Council more according to a certain spirit than according to the letter.

As Seerveld points out, «Generation after generation of Christian scholars kept reading past the obvious sense of what was before them and spent their sanctified ingenuity ascertaining the hidden «spiritual» meaning of the words, so as to lead the inexperienced laity into the way of mystical truth.

They are learning what it means to follow Jesus into the world, to experience true community with other believers, to read Scripture in a new light, and to serve others out of love rather than compulsion.

We read the Bible «through the Jesus lens» — which looks suspiciously like it means using the parts of the Gospels that we like, with the awkward bits carefully screened out, which enables us to disagree with the biblical texts on God, history, ethics and so on, even when Jesus didn't (Luke 17:27 - 32 is an interesting example).

Maybe it means reading a fun teen - fiction book that takes you out of your living room and into a land far far away.

Since I read about no marriage ceremony, doesn't that mean Cain, Abel and Seth were all born out of wedlock?

I don't mean to sound snippy — again, all for links and such and I do read a fair amount of what people reference — but sometimes it f = just feels like a cope - out for people actually thinking for themselves or having to face questions they don't have rehearsed answers to.

But Ball means that criticism of law is not conservative unless it proceeds from a natural law perspective, and, in the process, he reads a great many people out of the camp of political conservatism.

When libertarian Ronald Bailey reads Leon Kass reads on the need to reflect on the violence biotechnology might do to our natural enjoyments and natural fulfillments, he complains: «Leon Kass is out to kill me (meaning deprive me of biotechnology that might overcome nature's intention that Bailey soon enough be replaced by another member of our species).»

You will sense that particular gestures are appropriate, that certain words and phrases stand out in your practice readings, and that various meanings of the texts will be coming into sharper focus.

It would have been better, easier and best to for them if to read the most recognized holy books of the Three dominant religions and choose out a faith out of them taking the positive for life and society and leave out the negative for life and society rather than having it shoveled down your throat to take it as it is a be extreme on some thing that is mystic unexplainable or meant for different ages and unsuitable or scientifically disapproven.

The first couple of books start out as typical «solve - this - murder» sort of books (without being gory or cruel or gratuitous, it's more about the story and the characters)-- very satisfying Saturday night read — but as the books go forward, the layers and complex storytelling becomes even more clear and right around book three or four you begin to realise that everything is connected and everything means something and something major is unfolding and OMG MUST KEEP READING.

I did not mean to imply that pacifists of the messianic community have consciously built upon liberal — humanistic pacifism (though my sentence can be so read — mea culpa), but only to point out what should be obvious to all: that the inroads pacifists of the messianic community have made in Roman Catholic and Protestant mainline circles can be traced to a prior acceptance of liberal — humanistic pacifism by many in those circles.

I do understand the concept of the trinity, but let's be realistic... who made that up??? There is a lot of ignorance in this world, but if you can read the ten commandments — and they are very simple and straightforward — and know what they mean and convey then 1) the concept of the trinity goes out the window and 2) this entire debate about the building of the mosque goes oput the window as well because God instructed us «Love thy neighbor».

In the first section of this essay, in response to Griffin's objections to the analysis of «X is omnipotent» presupposed in Mackie's original challenge to Christian theism, we revised that analysis to read: «X is omnipotent means «It is within X's power to bring about any state of affairs (S) where X's bringing al) out S is logically possible.»

David after forty plus years in and out of churches hearing and reading even studying and dissecting (if that matters) For me, and that is the only one I ever speak for, if it is a song, a scripture that I may recall, a line in a movie or something one might share here, its only those that breath hope, light the way, give courage, inspire, and comfort to me as an individual that have meaning.

The reflective reading of the newspaper and other secular literature, the reading of various kinds of interpretive literature that helps one sort out his values and the meanings of his life — all constitute a part of the laymen's preparation for hearing the Word and for witnessing to it in his world.

How distinctive to the Movement these meanings turn out to be, and how central the concept was to Tractarianism as a religious rather than an intellectual movement, remain open questions, but FrPereiro has undoubtedly written a book that every serious student of the Oxford Movement will have to read.

The OT reading is paired with a NT reading that brings out the meaning of the OT.

The whole article should read, «Tiny fragment of papyrus taken out of context means nothing and is proof of nothing.».

There are many commentaries out there that were written after Ezra's reading of the Torah to the returning Exiles that have fought with the texts, trying to determine the meaning of the words, the glorification of violence and the various laws.

Well I guess if you want to read the bible and then make out of it what you want it to mean, that is ok but you need to remember that it also says (Love thy neighbor) and I see nothing after that, that states thy nieghbor has to be str8.

Instead of trying to discourage people reading it, you should try to pull the real meaning out of it for yourself as well.

But out of this experience also they pass with no more idea that it is meant to control all life than they feel when they pass from reading books to playing tennis.

Hi I have been trying a lot of your recipes and really enjoying them, I have been reading a lot though about you are meant to soak and then dry out seeds etc before using them, just wondered if you do this or if you think it is necessary?

I know you mean the chicken breasts but I happened to read it out of context and well... it it gave me a good laugh!

Leveling up meant swapping out lemon juice for any type of citrus, or maybe even a vinegar or brine — tips I picked up from reading enough restaurant riffs on the same beet tartare or hamachi crudo.

I don't mean to come down too hard on fans but the sort of reactions I have been reading and watching have spiraled out of control.

Reading the thread on this article and I noticed a lot of people naming strikers we could have gotten in past transfer windows that have gone to other club and failed, Balotelli, Falcao, Martinez, Boney etc are recurring names in all the comments, and am sat here thinking because they failed in thee clubs does not necessarily mean they would have failed if we had pulled out our fingers and hot them back then, Balotelli aside I strongly believe all of these players could have made a difference playing infront of our midfield and given the kind of attention and care Wenger gives Giroud and Walcott, adapting our play to suit them and giving them chances after chances even when its blatantly obvious they are average players so please lets not keep using that as an excuse for Wenger's ultra careful attitude in the transfer market, they could have failed with us, or they could have been massive for us, all speculations.

Your reading comprehension needs serious reassessment if you can somehow extrapolate these comments to mean that he has effectively ruled Arsenal out of signing him.

Hope this one doesn't pan out the only African player we should be going for is Keita other than that it makes no sense to me, there are so many wingers better than a one season Mahrez (dembele, Brandt, Lemar, pulisic, berrardi the kid from sassuolo, Forsberg, Marco asensio, Douglas costa, Allan saint maximin, the list goes on) plus all I read was how good his dribbling skills and the occasional goal or two, I also have seen him play and as soon as things get tough his head drops that's what I mean by lazy no character, no fighting spirit and we got loads of those players the only one who differs is Sanchez so if he is coming we lose Sanchez, so no sorry I won't be happy with that mediocre replacement!!

I mean the way u guys get on people mainly writers here is so disrespectful.Someone will sacrifice his time, effort among other things to bring out an article for u to read and keep yourselves busy but all you do is say direspectful things about his article.I know there are categories of them that are meaningless and clueless but definately not this same article.

Must be a joke; should be ashamed to even mention this game again... I need a good drink after what i read and shut my computer... Someone said we should not complain as Chelsea flopped 2 years ago... So, yeah, we should as well and accuse referrees... I'm out guys... The season is over, what we fighting for, 6 to 12 place... Liverpool can't finish behind us, we have no consistency nor game, just pass the ball like academy 6 year old do, passing the ball... Instead to put the damn ball behind the net, contrrol the ball and never score means no control of the game nor the ball, it should be behind frekin net...

Great Reception???, tell you the truth Im not one of those gunners who started supporting the gunners during the invicibles or early Wenger double winning years, quite honestly i wasnt ineterested in football and I liked a certain Crespo and Shevchenko meaning I liked the blue half of London, surprisingly when Mourinho joined I stopped watching football all together, till one glorious Champions League Night, It was my first ever Match there was a certain 20 year old highly rated youngster who scored a wonder goal that day he played with such skill and passion ever since then I started supporting arsenal that was during the barren years.I actually liked Barcelona because of their similarity with the arsenal, so when Fabregas joined Barca I started to watch them a bit more I still loved Arsenal and I was extremely passionate, the other players i adored left in painful manners, while some left which was still painful: i.e Eboue.I always taught cesc would come back and when it was official he was leaving Barca i said Finally almost hosting a party.Well reports started coming out that he is going to join chelsea and i laughed so hard and said he would be the last player on earth to do that, when it became official words cant express how i felt, He was the reason I started watching football he lit up the emirates with exquisite touches through balls to walcott, its a shame I would have preferred he joined bayern, or remained in barca its terrible reading the comments he made recently about the emirates, This was a captain, someone who led, anyways, like ive learnt and Arsenal have learnt, We do nt live in the past Like Liverpool (no pun) WE ARE THE PRESENT AND THE FUTURE (Crowley)(Puma) WE ARE ARSENAL.....

Prem league is the priority it has to be, Any news on sanchez I mean official news goodness every player in the world gets injured and you read within 2/3 days» so n so out for x amount of weeks etc» it's been 2 weeks nearly typical Arsenal.

Danny Welbeck has been ruled out for the next five months with a knee injury, meaning he will miss out on the European Championships as well as the opening three months of the Premier League, which may force Arsenal to sign another forward... Read the full article here

The worst for us out of the three possible results is Chelsea winning because it puts them 5 points in front of us but it'll still mean we're second plus there's the added delight of seeing manure beaten which is always a joy and then reading fergsuscum's pathetic bleating excuses in the papers the next day in which, no doubt, the ref will will be blamed.