I was continuously impressed by the skill with which Drew managed to call out all the b.s. that tends to surface in well -
meaning religious conversations around race («stop being divisive; we should focus on unity!»
Not exact matches
The phrase was» a «
religious, i.e. (that
means as an example) I am not clergy of any kind.If the
conversation is a little too fast for you try another thread.God bless «dr.»
It was not
meant to be a proposal for an all - encompassing theory for making
religious truth claims but, rather, an intramural Christian
conversation about secondary matters of faith.
When she employs the example to explain to me her own views and thus constructs within our
conversation an element of her own
religious identity, she is noting that the negotiated
meaning contributes something to her larger belief system - even if what it contributes is less than coherent.
Does it make sense to affirm that Jesus Christ is the one Savior of the world in
conversation with those who are finding
religious meaning in Buddhism?