Not exact matches
But unless we start with the presupposition that the unique is the true it is hard to maintain that this
kind of analysis can produce
meaningful results.
In short, even if there existed verifiable data from which to do some
kind of statistical
analysis of «rejection rates,» one could not draw any sound conclusions from that
analysis that would be
meaningful going forward.
The Financial Stability Board, which monitors the global financial system, recently said these
kind of risk - scenario
analyses should be a part
of meaningful climate risk disclosure.
But I think what it highlights is the instability
of mass movements which are essentially apolitical: it wasn't really a movement for anything, and somewhat preoccupied with something very emotive, which does not lend itself to formulating an
analysis, or project
of any
meaningful kind.
If that summary is correct, I would think, that to continue these
analyses in a
meaningful way and assuming that the details
of the more recent RCS algorithms will not be forthcoming, why not use a consensus (amongst our statistical minded participants here) best approach growth algorithm and see what
kind of Yamal series results and how well it performs through sensitivity testing.