The first thing about objectives is that you should avoid including generic or
meaningless statements into your resume.
Not exact matches
A negation sign in front of a
meaningless string of symbols does not convert the whole
into a meaningful
statement.
The linguistic and biblicist vetos have been seen to be both arbitrary and unwarranted — which makes it all the more pathetic that Dr Paul van Buren in The Secular Meaning of the Gospel still seems to accept them as valid and to rule out «God -
statements» as «
meaningless» while at the same time his excessive Barthian christocentrism and bibliocentrism turns the patent intention of scriptural
statement into a parody of their proper meaning.
The central idea of the article is a vicious feedback loop: Scientists make
meaningless or ambiguous
statements = > Advocates and media translate
statements into alarmist declarations = > Politicians respond to alarm by feeding scientists more money = > [a larger number of scientists and pseudo --RSB- Scientists make
meaningless or ambiguous [or false]
statements...
The Iron Triangle (and, the Iron Rice Bowl) described by Richard S. Lindzen, Ph.D., is as follows: «Scientists make
meaningless or ambiguous
statements... Advocates and media translate
statements into alarmist declarations... Politicians respond to alarm by feeding scientists more money.»