Not exact matches
Ayer would rule out as
meaningless such statements as «God is good», «God is responsible for the evils in the world», and «God loves you».
It was quickly pointed out that this would mean that a
statement such as «the moon is made of green cheese» is
meaningless.
The concept of operation and becoming as self - transcendence gives no warrant for causally linking anything with everything, and negative
statements such as «This can not produce that», or, «From this that can not come», are not to be rejected out of hand as
meaningless.
Such a
statement would have been unnecessary, even
meaningless, were John without prominence or praise.
However, McNicol said
such statements were «
meaningless» without action.
It's helpful, when politicians say
such things, to remember Orwell's maxim that if no one could possibly disagree with a
statement it is politically
meaningless.
Such a
statement is
meaningless, however, unless the question of why those materials became signifiers for an entire generation is considered.
Your broad
statements with zero basis other than «I can't see...» and other
such meaningless phrases do not equal analysis.
The uncertainty in the absolute flux makes
such a
statement meaningless.
Surely the fact that CO2 sublimes at a higher temperature than minus 80 °C demonstrates how
meaningless such statements are.
In this summary / objective
statement, it is important to avoid clichés and
meaningless sentences,
such as «Challenging full - time position that will be rewarding and offer room for advancement.»
Do not make
meaningless statements that are clichéd and not substantiated
such as «hard working».