Not exact matches
This
means that you are finding it vital to bring them deeper into the fold and engage them
in a
way that helps them
act as ambassadors for your brand.
There is something quintessential
in the
way the posters do not say «Don't Panic» or «We Will Prevail»... They say «Keep Calm,» and what that
means is, «We may be suffering something of an invasion at the moment, but that's no reason to start
acting in a rash and hot - headed manner.
The United States Department of Labor tackled this issue another
way in April, by saddling advisers with fiduciary duty,
meaning they must
act in the best interests of their clients.
It usually
means you criticize someone
in a personal
way or you
act overly familiar.
To me, it
means bots are
acting more human, providing more help
in a
way that seems natural, a part of our everyday routine.
The bill, the Tax Cuts and Jobs
Act, is making its
way through the House Ways and
Means Committee
in markup sessions.
So, if all this worries you, here are three
ways to
act like an Ant and plan for a self - funded retirement — just
in case
means testing becomes a reality sooner rather than later:
If you choose to offer ownership equity
in your business, your family member (
acting as an investor) should be treated the same
way you would treat any other equity investor, this
means they will be exchanging capital for a percentage of ownership, or stake,
in your business.
From this heavily fortified definitional base George and Bradley reason that sexual
acts of the reproductive type typically further the good of marriage, and persons (whether married or not) who engage
in sexual
acts of the nonreproductive type «necessarily treat their bodies and those of their sexual partners (if any) as
means or instruments
in ways that damage their personal (and interpersonal) integrity.»
But
in our society, where so many people
act out their hunger for love, esteem, and
meaning in destructive, irresponsible
ways, Glasser's therapy is a valuable growth resource.
But,
in my experience, sometimes the best
way to keep communication healthy and open is to go to bed angry and then talk about it the next morning when you've had enough sleep to know that leaving the milk out
in the car probably wasn't a veiled
act of aggression
meant to symbolize every problem
in the relationship, but rather just the sort of mistake anyone would make while distracted by a fascinating story on NPR.
Instead of the person engaging
in the
acts paying their own
way (instead of controlling themselves and living within their
means) they want everyone else to chip
in and make it more affordable for them to continue with their habits.
Because of God's transcendence it would be mythological to refer to God's action
in terms appropriate only to objects available,
in principle at least, to ordinary sense perception.13 This especially
means that one can not speak of God
in terms of the categories of time and space; 14 i.e., whatever is predicated of God can not apply only to some particular time and space, but must apply equally to all times and spaces.15 Thus the implication of Ogden's criterion for non-mythological language about God corresponds to his statement of several years ago, that «there is not the slightest evidence that God has
acted in Christ
in any
way different from the
way in which he primordially
acts in every other event.
The article is describing how people are finally waking up and realizing that yes natural disasters MIGHT be caused by a celestial being but that again does not
mean in ANY
way that it is because the human race has sinned or committed some specific
act that warrented a natural disaster as punishment.
A perusal of the Church of the Brethren Web pages provides clear evidence that a commitment to pacifism is not limited to denominational headquarters: the 48 churches of the Northern Indiana District Conference have joined to urge «the use of nonviolent approaches and interventions»
in response to the terror; the Elizabethtown, Pennsylvania, Church of the Brethren has adopted a statement
in which they «remain committed to walk
in the Jesus
way of nonviolent love,
in which evil can only be overcome with redemptive
acts of love»; a group of Brethren Volunteer Service Workers have issued a statement
in which they «advocate the use of nonviolent
means to settle disputes» and «stand opposed to the increased drive toward militarization»; on October 7 members of local Brethren churches (along with Mennonites and others) organized a peace rally at the state capitol
in Harrisburg, «Sowing Seeds of Peace: Prayers and Petitions for Nonviolent Action,» which attracted over 300 people.
Hi my name is Lindsey and I'm recovering heroin addict and my mother is a very devoted rightous Christian her favorite saying is I am the head and not the tail
meaning she is the head is far better than me and I am the tail and because the
way Christians have treated me recently through my struggle I have felt that I should convert to Hinduism when I brought this up to my mother she told me I will go to hell because Jesus is the only God which I do believe to an extent but I also believe
in having peace within your own life and treating others equally fairly with love respect and dignity which my mother and my sister do not do the
act as though they are better than anyone they do not sin they do not make mistakes and they are perfect
in every
way another one of her favorite sayings I'm not perfect but I'm going to try to be BC Jesus loves me that much.
I think God speaks clearly
in these times because of his silence it means he has had enough of our ways we havent listened we have gone our own way we havent acted on what his prophets have spoken so he distances himself until such time that we will take him seriously.Thats how it was in the old testament he allowed his people to go into captivity or bondage when they refused to obey his word.We see this pattern repeated over and over for example In Egypt when they were in slavery it wasnt until the people acknowledged there sin and cried out to God to save them and he did by sending a savior moses.Because we have Christ we have grace he wont spurn us like he used to because Christ took away our reproach and he is free to love us despite our sinfulness.brent
in these times because of his silence it
means he has had enough of our
ways we havent listened we have gone our own
way we havent
acted on what his prophets have spoken so he distances himself until such time that we will take him seriously.Thats how it was
in the old testament he allowed his people to go into captivity or bondage when they refused to obey his word.We see this pattern repeated over and over for example In Egypt when they were in slavery it wasnt until the people acknowledged there sin and cried out to God to save them and he did by sending a savior moses.Because we have Christ we have grace he wont spurn us like he used to because Christ took away our reproach and he is free to love us despite our sinfulness.brent
in the old testament he allowed his people to go into captivity or bondage when they refused to obey his word.We see this pattern repeated over and over for example
In Egypt when they were in slavery it wasnt until the people acknowledged there sin and cried out to God to save them and he did by sending a savior moses.Because we have Christ we have grace he wont spurn us like he used to because Christ took away our reproach and he is free to love us despite our sinfulness.brent
In Egypt when they were
in slavery it wasnt until the people acknowledged there sin and cried out to God to save them and he did by sending a savior moses.Because we have Christ we have grace he wont spurn us like he used to because Christ took away our reproach and he is free to love us despite our sinfulness.brent
in slavery it wasnt until the people acknowledged there sin and cried out to God to save them and he did by sending a savior moses.Because we have Christ we have grace he wont spurn us like he used to because Christ took away our reproach and he is free to love us despite our sinfulness.brentnz
The bill, called the Religious Freedom Restoration
Act (RFRA), would protect the right of every person to practice his religion, without exception, unless the government can show that it bas a «compelling» reason to interfere (
meaning that the reasons for the interference are extraordinarily important and can not reasonably be attained
in any other
way).
You are assuming it
means He always
acts in the same
way.
The channels of publicity, according to this view, are
means of exerting influence, of getting people to believe and to
act in ways the publicist desires.
Hebrews 13:8 doesn't
mean that Jesus always
acts in the same
way.
Even when we see someone who feels that his life is meaningless and as a result contemplates and may even commit suicide, there remains that hidden sense of
meaning — for to be a suicide is to say that at least
in this
way, if
in no other, I may
act out meaningfully what I think is worth doing.
We do NOT become Jesus or God, but we are called by scripture
in God's Word to become LIKE Him, which
means choosing what He would choose,
acting the
way He would
act, loving what He would love, etc., et al..
The divine aim to call forth civilizations whose
meanings and purposes are at one with God's purposes - for - them and whose histories accord with the divine activity succeeds, therefore, only where individual human beings, citizens of those societies,
act and believe
in ways transparent to the
ways of God.
It
means thinking no evil
in a censorious spirit of anyone, for while some
acts and attitudes must be judged sinful, it was Christ's
way to love the sinner even while condemning the sin.
In every free act God is experienced non-explicitly, but truly; and what is meant by God is only experienced in this way, namely the Whither (incomprehensible by knowledge and will) of the one original transcendence of man, which consists in knowledge and lov
In every free
act God is experienced non-explicitly, but truly; and what is
meant by God is only experienced
in this way, namely the Whither (incomprehensible by knowledge and will) of the one original transcendence of man, which consists in knowledge and lov
in this
way, namely the Whither (incomprehensible by knowledge and will) of the one original transcendence of man, which consists
in knowledge and lov
in knowledge and love.
It
means not
acting or speaking
in a
way we don't believe is right, not for popularity with peers or for success on the job or for acceptance by a church.
So,
in a roundabout
way, the military assigned
meaning to hair length, the guards continued this
meaning, and you carried the association further by
acting in reaction to it.
For my part I can
in a
way understand Abraham, but at the same time I apprehend that I have not the courage to speak, and still less to
act as he did — but by this I do not by any
means intend to say that what he did was insignificant, for on the contrary it is the one only marvel.
In sum, the Muslim community surely does not respect and be sensitive to other groups» belief / faith, yet they demand other to respect them by the mean of threatening in an evil act of violate, when they do not get their wa
In sum, the Muslim community surely does not respect and be sensitive to other groups» belief / faith, yet they demand other to respect them by the
mean of threatening
in an evil act of violate, when they do not get their wa
in an evil
act of violate, when they do not get their
way.
To disclose the «essence» of an object, a feeling, even of the very
act of painting as
in the case of Abstract Expressionist painters,
means to envision a characteristic
way of seeing.
When God reveals himself, he always does so to people, which
means that he must speak and
act in ways that they will understand... It is essential to the very nature of revelation that the Bible is not unique to its environment.
In searching for
meaning and application of his thought, Bonhoeffer plays down the traditional idea of repentance as a religious
act, concerned with one's own needs, and stresses rather the positive side of «allowing oneself to be caught up into the
way of Jesus Christ.
If pantheism can say that any event it likes is the work of the Godhead, quite apart from its
meaning in personal encounter, Christian faith can only say that
in such - and - such an event God is
acting in a hidden
way.
Since Humanae Vitae, the fiftieth anniversary of which we celebrate this year, there has been a constant stream of Jesuit moral theologians arguing
in print that the encyclical was a mistake, that it is enough if the unitive and procreative dimensions of sex and marriage are linked
in only a very general
way — not
in each marital
act — and that the really deep
meaning of Paul VI's teaching is that couples should exercise responsible parenthood.
It is also a set of affirmations which give
meaning to our
way of life and illuminate our worship of God, a set of affirmations
in terms of which we live and the
meaning of which is declared to us and by us every time we participate
in an
act of Christian worship.
[7] These
acts ultimately aim to help persons deal with questions about the
meaning and worth of their lives by helping them not only to understand their troubles
in a fresh
way in the light of God's presence but also actively to live through their troubles
in the context of God's presence.
Ghee's purported benefits are myriad: it contains butyric acid, a short - chain fatty acid found
in dairy products, and
acts as food for colonocytes, the cells of your colon (
meaning it's good for the digestive tract); it doesn't seem to raise cholesterol
in the same
way butter does.
Coquelin is a fantastic DM, I
mean the
way he tortured both Manchester clubs was just amazing...
In those
acts, he wasn't just trying to please Wenger, he was helping the team as well... He must have seen that, Arsenal doesn't have a player like him since Arteta got injured....
but, im ok with this vardy transfer... it shows us many things: 1) wenger is changing, something some of us have been demanding for a long time; 2) it shows that wenger is taking risks: think about it, he is buying a men for a not cheap price, knowing he could not getting anything after, with a future sell i
mean... this is an
act that shows wengers intentions to win something, the buy is not motivated by any financial or economic reason but only for a «get the f epl once again» reason... this is an
act that shows us hungry, even if we fail, we could said we try... first ever, we really try; 3) finally but very important... vardy is the kind of player we need... he is a warrior, a fighter... he has character... look at how he celebrate his goals... full of energy... he, like alexis, can motivate the team when the things are not going
in our
way (something wenger cant do because of his age and because he has never been an active coach on the pitch)... the vardy transfer, if it finish well, is a demostration of a change, and a good one... lets take care of winning things and do nt look the economic side for once... vardy is a bit old, but we can give a chance to welbeck after maybe, or akpom... u are not thinking about the future when we talk about ibra... guys: u complain when wenger do nt spend or because he is always looking for the bargain when u are the guys who has to pay the very expensive tickets... u complain when wenger buy the always for the future guy... like morata... stop to complain for everything and be consequent with yourself... i would love auba, but it is not going to happen... lukaku is awesome but the asking price is stupid... lets try with vardy, give us the throphy..
Creatine is not an acute -
acting supplement,
meaning its effects are
in no meaningful
way affected by when you take it, so long as you do so consistently (i.e., daily).
In no
way my support
means that i should not voice my opinion and
act like the three monkeys when I am not satisfied with players or the management of the club.
This is an incredibly difficult question to answer for a variety of reasons, most importantly because over the years our once vaunted «beautiful» style of play has become a shadow of it's former self, only to be replaced by a less than stellar «plug and play» mentality where players play out of position and adjustments / substitutions are rarely forthcoming before the 75th minute... if you look at our current players, very few would make sense
in the traditional Wengerian system... at present, we don't have the personnel to move the ball quickly from deep - lying position, efficient one touch midfielders that can make the necessary through balls or the disciplined and pacey forwards to stretch defences into wide positions, without the aid of the backs coming up into the final 3rd, so that we can attack the defensive lanes
in the same clinical fashion we did years ago... on this current squad, we have only 1 central defender on staf, Mustafi, who seems to have any prowess
in the offensive zone or who can even pass two zones through so that we can advance play quickly out of our own end (I have seen some inklings that suggest Holding might have some offensive qualities but too early to tell)... unfortunately Mustafi has a tendency to get himself
in trouble when he gets overly aggressive on the ball... from our backs out wide, we've seen pace from the likes of Bellerin and Gibbs and the spirited albeit offensively stunted play of Monreal, but none of these players possess the skill - set required
in the offensive zone for the new Wenger scheme which requires deft touches, timely runs to the baseline and consistent crossing, especially when Giroud was playing and his ratio of scored goals per clear chances was relatively low (better last year though)... obviously I like Bellerin's future prospects, as you can't teach pace, but I do worry that he regressed last season, which was obvious to Wenger because there was no
way he would have used Ox as the right side wing - back so often knowing that Barcelona could come calling
in the off - season, if he thought otherwise... as for our midfielders, not a single one, minus the more confident Xhaka I watched played for the Swiss national team a couple years ago, who truly makes sense under the traditional Wenger model... Ramsey holds onto the ball too long, gives the ball away cheaply far too often and abandons his defensive responsibilities on a regular basis (doesn't score enough recently to justify): that being said, I've always thought he does possess a little something special, unfortunately he thinks so too... Xhaka is a little too slow to ever boss the midfield and he tends to telegraph his one true strength, his long ball play: although I must admit he did get a bit better during some points
in the latter part of last season... it always made me wonder why whenever he played with Coq Wenger always seemed to play Francis
in a more advanced role on the pitch... as for Coq, he is
way too reckless at the wrong times and has exhibited little offensive prowess yet finds himself
in and around the box far too often... let's face it Wenger was ready to throw him
in the trash heap when injuries forced him to use Francis and then he had the nerve to
act like this was all part of a bigger Wenger constructed plan... he like Ramsey, Xhaka and Elneny don't offer the skills necessary to satisfy the quick transitory nature of our old offensive scheme or the stout defensive mindset needed to protect the defensive zone so that our offensive players can remain aggressive
in the final third... on the front end, we have Ozil, a player of immense skill but stunted by his physical demeanor that tends to offend, the fact that he's been played out of position far too many times since arriving and that the players
in front of him, minus Sanchez, make little to no sense considering what he has to offer (especially Giroud); just think about the quick counter-attack offence
in Real or the space and protection he receives
in the German National team's midfield, where teams couldn't afford to focus too heavily on one individual... this player was a passing «specialist» long before he arrived
in North London, so only an arrogant or ignorant individual would try to reinvent the wheel and / or not surround such a talent with the necessary components...
in regards to Ox, Walcott and Welbeck, although they all possess serious talents I see them
in large part as headless chickens who are on the injury table too much, lack the necessary first - touch and / or lack the finishing flair to warrant their inclusion
in a regular starting eleven; I would say that, of the 3, Ox showed the most upside once we went to a back 3, but even he became a bit too consumed by his pending contract talks before the season ended and that concerned me a bit... if I had to choose one of those 3 players to stay on it would be Ox due to his potential as a plausible alternative to Bellerin
in that wing - back position should we continue to use that formation...
in Sanchez, we get one of the most committed skill players we've seen on this squad for some years but that could all change soon, if it hasn't already of course... strangely enough, even he doesn't make sense given the constructs of the original Wenger offensive model because he holds onto the ball too long and he will give the ball up a little too often
in the offensive zone... a fact that is largely forgotten due to his infectious energy and the fact that the numbers he has achieved seem to justify the
means... finally, and
in many
ways most crucially, Giroud, there is nothing about this team or the offensive system that Wenger has traditionally employed that would even suggest such a player would make sense as a starter... too slow, too inefficient and
way too easily dispossessed... once again, I think he has some special skills and, at times, has showed some world - class qualities but he's lack of mobility is an albatross around the necks of our offence... so when you ask who would be our best starting 11, I don't have a clue because of the 5 or 6 players that truly deserve a place
in this side, 1 just arrived, 3 aren't under contract beyond 2018 and the other was just sold to Juve... man, this is theraputic because following this team is like an addiction to heroin without the benefits
I hope Gazidis called him up and spoke to him but no
way to tell either
way, I don't
mean this as a negative but as something good, we could
act quicker
in the summer window.
I
mean, he was playing so well that excited comments like Wenger has found another Koscielny were being spoken
in deferential tones but this all came to an abrupt halt after the really naive
way he
acted against Chelsea.
Unless you fear for your life, doing a vanishing
act, leaving a note, or doing it
in an explosion or
in a
mean way not only is the wrong
way, but it will likely make the divorce process even more miserable for you (your spouse will still have a numerous chances to get even during the legal process, and during any interactions thereafter — few can go through the rest of their lives without having some necessary contact with a former spouse).
When speaking of one's self, discipline
means having control over one's self
in order to
act in a
way you feel is appropriate.
When supporters of the central coordination of the provision of healthcare by the state say that healthcare is a human right they
mean that this right ought to place an obligation on everyone... to
act in such as
way as to support everyone else's health needs
He told MPs: «It is all very well for some people to say that there are some exemptions, but the truth is that the
way that some journalists and the information commissioner are
acting means that that intention is not being met
in practice.»
If a histone protein could be disabled
in this
way and cells still behaved normally, then that would
mean there was some other protein that the enzyme
acted on.