Sentences with phrase «means clearer more»

Time spent playing with your child now, means clearer more effective social communication later.

Incresed demand for agricultural products means clearing more land.

Not exact matches

For those who don't think government ought to do more for those who have the means to save but don't, the clear option for CPP is to do nothing.

They might not even know what it is but they will still apply, which means you will have to go through their CV, translating into more pointless labor you can avoid by just being clear about what the job is.

Economic growth has been good for snowplowing — new businesses and storefronts mean more parking lots and walkways that need to be cleared.

Your business activities should mean more to you than just clearing a profit margin.

Running a successful startup means more rainy days than bright, clear skies.

To be a truly collaborative leader and colleague, you need to be willing to get clear on what collaboration means for you and others, address non-collaborative behaviors when you see them, and offer feedback when you see someone making the positive changes you've requested to create a more collaborative environment.

While those big boxes suit some enterprise situations, it's clear that more companies are offloading at least part of their work to cloud providers, which means they buy fewer servers less often than they had in the past.

In one company split Shah worked on, it was clear that one of the businesses was on a growth spurt while the other one was going to operate more «lean and mean,» he said.

Add to that the consideration that users will also soon be able to cross-post their Instagram Stories to Facebook direct (Facebook have now confirmed this is being rolled out), and it's fairly clear to see — if you want to reach more people (which means more dollars), you use Instagram.

While, it's not clear whether the growth and deficit targets are achievable, it is clear that keeping the growth target the same as last year means the government is not interested in risking slower growth by advancing economic reforms more rapidly.

Our comprehensive markets, clearing houses and data solutions mean that we uniquely deliver more mission critical markets, risk management and data for our customers» workflow than any other exchange operator in the world.

That doesn't mean you can't write it better — perhaps you can be more thorough, more clear, or provide more meaningful examples.

We are entering the first wave of change and we will undoubtedly have several more before we have a clear picture of how much buyer behavior has changed and what these changes mean for B2B businesses.

I want to be clear about what I mean by this, because many people believe this issue relates to current skilled labour shortages; some think it applies to our need to attract more professionals such as doctors, engineers and scientists; while others focus on the glass ceiling that many existing immigrants and visible minorities experience.

But more importantly, because it offers final settlement, meaning payments clearing without any remaining counter-party risk, in less than an hour.

Christians have to corrupt the clear meanings in the bible because they are more moral today than the fundamental basis of the religion.

First, by means of more honest bookkeeping, it makes clear the cost of the commitment that the previous Supervised Ministry program had kept hidden.

After the Apostle had been called by Allah, the ulama — those leaders who were well - versed in Islam — recognized that there were two types of texts in the Qur» an: those which are clear and definite and those which could have more than one meaning.

Dean Kelley has argued that the conservatives provide a clearer meaning system for their adherents, The culture at large is shifting on several fronts toward a style more prescriptive, less permissive.

The legislation of the Qur» an is of two kinds: that which has a crystal clear and decisive meaning not open to debate, and legislation liable to have two or more meanings.

Pope Paul VI declared Catherine of Sienna to be a Doctor of the Church, and he hinted that there was much more to be done here, and that new things would be happening over the next years: «it is evident that women are meant to form part of the living and working structure of Christianity in so prominent a manner that perhaps not all their potentialities have yet been made clear».

If we ask what virtue and corruption meant to the founding fathers the answer is clear from the quotations I have just cited and from many more I could have cited.

In any case it should be clear that we do not create unity, no more than we bring about righteousness by means of our works, but that on the other hand we should not sit around twiddling our thumbs.

Finally, to complete the task immediately at hand, let me point out that Whitehead has also made abundantly clear the synonymity of the terms «being», «entity» and «thing»»... «potentiality for process» is the meaning of the more general term «entity» or «thing»» (PR 68).

What I do think, is that we need to be clear that being a Christian, means we FOLLOW Christ, as its much more than a magic sentence.

Not sure i am convinced because how do you explain the verse an eye for an eye in the old testament there have always been consequences for wrong doing and stiill are for sin.If we believe the word then that word is from God not satan.As far as satan is concerned he uses violence as his tools of trade he works on our fears and is limited to robbing stealing and destroying he does nt have anything else.Violence confirms to us that there is a spiritual battle going on both on the earthly plane and in the heavenlys and the battle is over souls.The verse the kingdon of heaven is expanding and violent people take it by force is referring to that spiritual battle and as satan uses violence to expand his dominion so does God use violence to counter him.So what does he mean by that term for me i think it is saying that the the force of evil that satan uses or violence is overcome by a greater violence or force a more powerful one that being the Love of Christ.Through the cross we see that clearly portrayed and in our lives that very same battle is still happening right now for dominion be clear if we walk in the flkesh satan will have dominion over us but if we walk according to the spirit and abide in Christ we have freedom from our old nature.and satan.He can oppose us but he wont be able to influence us if we are in Christ.

It is the reality of what is potential, in its character of a real component of what is actual» (PR 103; italics added), We need now a clearer grasp of the nature of this potentiality and if we really understand what Whitehead means in this last sentence, when he refers to the character of this potentiality as «a real component of what is actual,» then we will understand the nature of the extensive continuum much more clearly.

Happily I was minister of a church where the doors were and are wide open to a man like that, for about three years later he said to me, «No words can estimate what this has meant — each year clearer insight, deeper assurance, and life more and more worth while.»

Yet much can be done in the way of making clear the understanding of man's spiritual nature, his high destiny which points beyond this life for its fulfillment, the meaning of the Kingdom for this life and the next, the Christian concepts of judgment and salvation with eternity in their span — in short, the goodness and power of a God who, having given us this life, can give us another in which to attain to his nearer presence, enjoy a richer happiness, and do his will more perfectly.

I mean, I made it pretty clear if they use the line «meat is murder» one more time, I am going to cause someone pain.

It would be unfaithful to both the best in the world of scientific learning and the wisest kind of religious leadership to offer more than these broad clear strokes in the portrayal of what it means in our day to undertake the work of a scientist as a Christian calling.

It is clear from the start, therefore, in an ontology and general metaphysical philosophy of man, that the very question of a possible derivation of spirit from matter has no meaning, because that would amount to attempting to derive what is logically and ontologically prior from what is in both respects posterior, and to imply that what is earlier in temporal succession must ipso facto also be the ontological ground of what in space and time is later and more material.

The modern concept of a state of motion makes it clear what is meant: something which does not really become more but simply alters, and in this sense comes about, but in such a way that what is new in it is always identical with the relinquishing of something of the old.

Of course, he is by no means unaware of such difficulties, as is clear from the admission already cited and clearer still from his statement elsewhere, that, as compared with the traditional problem of evil, «there are other difficulties in theism» that he at least finds «more formidable.»

Once again, it must be made clear that talk of enrichment is not meant to suggest that God becomes any more «God» than he always has been; what is intended by such language is simply that, because God is supremely related to all occasions, these various occurrences provide material for his fuller expression in relationship with creation and at the same time bring about an enhancement of the divine joy as well as a participation through «suffering» (or sharing as participation) in all that takes place in the world.

The first couple of books start out as typical «solve - this - murder» sort of books (without being gory or cruel or gratuitous, it's more about the story and the characters)-- very satisfying Saturday night read — but as the books go forward, the layers and complex storytelling becomes even more clear and right around book three or four you begin to realise that everything is connected and everything means something and something major is unfolding and OMG MUST KEEP READING.

In making such a statement, it is important to make clear at once that by the «fact of Jesus» I mean more than the merely formal, external fact that an individual by that name had actually lived at a given time and place.

But when you recall that the word «baptism» means «immersion into» or «overwhelmed by» or «fully identified with» then these passages become much more clear.

But when we recognize (as we saw in the post yesterday about the definition of baptism) that «baptism» means «immersion into» or «identification with» some of the tricky passages in Scripture become much more clear.

By simple, I do not mean that our ideas should be simplistic, but that our words should become more clear and direct.

I have had a change of heart on this and i believe that jesus means what he says for us to go and sin no more.Why because the women caught in adultery is us it is a universal message for us sinners judged and condemned by the law if we do nt want to be under the law then the only way is to follow jesus but not according to the flesh but according to the spirit.Because if we walk in the spirit we will not gratify the desires of the flesh.Which means we will not sin that sums up the message once having been saved by jesus we follow him and walk by the spirit the message is clear and he provides the means for us to do it through his holy spirit.For sin shall not have dominion over us we are more than conquerers overcomers through Jesus Christ.

But more profound investigation and more sympathetic understanding of the primitive groups, as well as a deeper penetration into the meaning of more sophisticated worship, have made it clear to the majority of anthropologists that there is a very real distinction between magic and worship.

If we translate it differently, the meaning becomes more clear.

But Leclerc elsewhere makes clear that he means more than this.

This point become much more clear in Romans 6 if we remember that «baptism» means «immersion into» or «fully identified with.»

Second, it must be quite clear that participating in more than one religio - cultural tradition does not mean an opportunistic putting together of a featureless mass of religious resources.

Hume's assertion that our «religious phase» may have been the «inevitable» precondition or «vessel» of secular morality (it isn't clear whether he means naturally or historically inevitable) can't get the ethical humanist secularist around the more haunting question of whether the secular political project of mass ethical secularism is viable, much less sustainable — especially if that social order is not to be grounded in philosophy, and especially if the politics in question must, as apparently it must, be one grounded in rights to freedoms.

I remember how this became clear to me at a Notre Dame departmental retreat where we were discussing, one more time, what it meant to be a theology department in a Catholic school.