Sentences with phrase «means giving more money»

But I would rather pay the taxes now, and yes that means giving more money to the government now, than get taxed on it later in life.

Not exact matches

Firstly, because it means higher interest rates — so when companies try to borrow money, that money will become more expensive and as a result they will have less room to give returns to investors.

Evans rings off some simple rules: don't buy anything you're pressured to buy or don't understand; ask the seller for their qualifications and track record, and if they don't give satisfactory answers, don't buy; don't invest more money than you can stand to lose, and never invest it all in one deal; avoid anything with an offshore element to it («That means your money's never coming back»); and seek out an unbiased second opinion, say, from your accountant or bank manager.

For those who have the means but still have doubts, Kevin O'Leary, «Shark Tank» celebrity investor and founder of O'Leary Financial Group, known for his blunt opinions on television, provided a blunt assessment of why more people — celebrities or not — should give: «If you make money, you've got ta give some back, or you go to a bad place after you die.»

The fact that raising more money means giving up equity in the company to outside investors didn't seem to bother Fulop.

However, given that these models are more sophisticated, consider more factors, and get to similar (though non-identical) results through very different means, my money is on the models.

Increasingly, as this latest filing shows, conservative donors are choosing to funnel their money through Donors Trust instead of giving it themselves, meaning more of the money fueling conservative politics is draped in secrecy.

That was highlighted in the Business Insider article How To Show Your Employees You Care About Them, which states, «The bottom line is taking a personal interest in your employees will give them reason to believe they mean more to you than someone who's simply making you or the business money.»

Every Sunday sermon and I mean every sunday sermon concentrated on HOW WE SHOULD BE GIVING MORE MONEY to the Church.

As an example, we have all sat through a missions conference where the emphasis of a sermon was on the meaning of the word «Go» in Matthew 28:19, but the only call to action at the end of the message was to give more money when the plate was passed.

a set of values, beliefs, and structure in a person's life in order to give them direction and a sense of right and wrong is fine, but organized religions are no more than large corporations, and like any large corporation are only focused on their bottom line... trying to control the public and extract as much money as they can from them by any means necessary... promoting fear, uncertainty, hate and a sense that they alone can offer salvation... for a price (although they are very cleaver about getting to this hidden and unspoken cost... after all these hundreds of years they have perfected their craft well!)

But a few years ago a court ruled that eminent domain meant the government could seize private land and give it / sell it to another private concern who could show they would return more tax money.

«God will provide» means that God will provide money or, more accurately, that God will provide people willing to give money.

I was talking to a person if he went to church and he stated all they want is your money.You got to give your money to read books about GOD, I mean like thirty dollars and more and the same for a dvd or like if you could give 1,000 or more to keep on the air.He and I both think we are better off stay at home and read the Bible and study it.I think if you are born with the new sperit of GOD you will understand the Bible without the loss of great somes of money.After they sell so many dvds it becomes 100 % profit and they never lower the price so can obtain one.For this is wrong, it states in the Bible that this would happen preachers for money to learn about everyones GOD.They forgot one thing JESUS never forced money from you to hear the wordof salvation Im a follower of JESUS CHRIST OUR LORD He is the way.Im not a so called Christian just.

i think we need to finish in the top 3.2 nd or 3rd doesn't matter to me because they are both automatic qualification spots.2 nd place means slightly more money and it may give the club more confidence, but it is the the 1st of the losers in reality.I think if we come 2nd which we probably will it may well hurt us, i know it sounds strange but i think Wenger will take 2nd place as a vindication an refuse to buy any1 as usual.

This obviously means that it becomes difficult to sell peripheral players on to teams more suited to their ability given their prevailing wages.Why would Jenkinson, Ospina, Gibbs, Debuchy wish to leave if they can earn more money remaining at Arsenal.

Emirates stadium and huge sponsor deals we finally have had two poor years by his standards at the helm we always havent been so great and are we weak supporters or strong give him a contract i mean hes won with ants for money let him spend for once cause even if we do get new manager inflation has occured and no body else will win with the small amounts we gave him to spend and in 20 years actuall more it seems the club is finally willing to spend give him a contract let him spend and if we do nt improve which i think we will i think that the club is finally willing to spend shows were on an upturn because as long as top four the owner and board weren't and after we spend big or somewhat big for once and auba and mkhitaryan arent the big im hoping for i want more if liverpoodlians can pay 75million for a cb let wenget spend a bit and if we still do bad we can always sack him or ask him to leave wouldnt be uncommon but we owe it to him and do nt say we do not because emirates london colney that will bring in high talent here for years to come and we have never spent for him just gave little and hes always done big things with little i think he can do bigger things in his final years if we give him big i do nt see us in decline but if we sack him we will be for a good three maybe four years

The problem is with ur stubborn attitude.Thing is you think you can win the premiership on the cheap, but you cant cause you can't motivate the players ffs.Leicester winning the premiership will give you one more reason to say see i told you we don't need to spend big money to win the league, but you had 12 attempts to do so for the past 12 years cause our team for those year was better than Leicester squad and you still didn't win a thing.Just because you have a mouth doesn't mean you could say anything show some respect for the fans, stop blaming the fans its the mediocre players who you have at the club that needs to blamed.And you as well for not spending any money on outfield player in the summer.

Bolton Wanderers, Bury, Manchester City, Manchester United, Oldham Athletic, Rochdale and Wigan Athletic would combine too, with all these sides forming richly funded teams with huge fanbases, bringing in fresh talent for more money and giving more fans a chance to win with their local team, meaning there is no longer a drain from the less popular regions of fans switching to Chelsea or Manchester City or whomever.

The Premier League is a more money - rich league, which means the pressure on managers to perform is ENORMOUS, and they end up backing the tried and tested players rather than giving a chance to the unproven.

Joline Godfrey is the CEO of Independent Means and the author of Raising Financially Fit Kids; Our Wildest Dreams: Women Making Money, Having Fun, Doing Good; No More Frogs To Kiss: 99 Ways to Give Economic Power to Girls; andTwenty $ ecrets to Money and Independence: The DollarDiva's Guide to Life.

Not sure, if this is undetAnd, labour spent more than the Tories in 2005 75 % of labours spending in 1997 came from the private side, and recall 1979 when the closed shop meant everyone had to joina Union, that union had to give money to the labour party, we knew the next election would be the most vicious since 1992 ′ we win the campaign, lost the election that time, The Tory press isn't as strong as it was then, the tories haven't got lost of «extremist» stories about labour they had thrn to smear us now, They're a smaller party not just cos of Ukip, But labour has a lot of keen strong members, and it'll come doen to 70 or so marginal seats what happens, while not losing our working class votes in Newcastle, birmingham Luton Rotherham, Scotland, and if they're not abstaining, or voting Ukip, we have to ask why they're voting tory

New York State is already the No. 1 donor state in the nation, meaning we give the federal government more money than we get back, and we get back a lower percentage than any other state.

Mr Cameron and the other party leaders have vowed to allow Scotland to keep the Barnett Formula in perpetuity — which means the amount of money given by the Treasury to Scotland works out at # 1,600 a head more than England.

It is one of a few select programs that will be allowed to front - load money: This means that funding normally assigned to 2017, for instance, can be spent earlier to finance more research projects than initially planned in a given year.

Whereas the above websites offer plenty of real women and a simple means of connecting with them, in our opinion these services are more focused on making money off of your subscription than giving you what they promise.

(Though this is an example of the sometimes wooden prose that can make this book a workout, what they mean is that it's better to give schools more competition than more money.)

What [the Children's Scholarship Fund has] given me is so much more than money; you have given me opportunity, confidence, faith, and trust that life has meaning, and that I am meant to succeed no matter what obstacles come my way.»

But Indiana State Teachers Association president Nate Schnellenberger says he fears giving charters access to state money will create more entities dependent on government support, meaning the state will shortchange failing public schools serving the same low - income populations.

But if you have more money than you know what to do with and you want an SUV that is capable of giving you thrills, by all means go for the X5M.

They look at it as an opportunity to make more money (I mean besides the fact it's actually needed), so it's a given.

The best opportunities are in «hybrid» publishing, which means, doing the things that make you the most money and build your author platform (those two things are not identical, and often even at odds: as in, you may give one book away for free to reach new readers, and make money on other books you charge more on).

The iPad mini does give it a run for its money but there's just a little bit more flex to its chassis which to our minds means the bigger model takes the crown.

This means that publishing independently gives authors a greater opportunity to make more money from their books and achieve monetary success.

When you give more value to a borrowing system that is less rewarding for authors than sales, it's a mean to give less money to self - publishers as a whole.

This means that a print book is basically a vanity project for me so I have something to give to my Mum & Dad I still want to do print books but because of the extra design & pro-typesetting I want to use, it takes more money than ebooks.

So I guess same question as above, since this isn't a «scam» in the fraud sense, then if I didn't agree to pay them anything (however gave them too much personal information) does it mean they can still screw me out of more money at this point?

So if I understand correctly this means that the fund manager will first decide what the quarterly dividend is going to be and then if the companies in the fund pay out more than that of the quarterly dividend he wants to give out then he will reinvest the money into the companies in the fund.

a. tax rates would have to rise significantly in order to make it not that way (and who's to say that capital gains rates won't increase by even more given their current historical lows) b. automatic savings in a retirement plan actually means money goes into an account instead of planning on saving «what's left» c. you can't get at the money without significant pain, which is a great disincentive from you buying a car with your Roth money.

Of course, the same things happen to your co-signer, but collection agencies may pursue him or her more seriously, given that he or she probably has more means and assets than you do and is likelier to belatedly cough up the money for your education.

Providing pertinent tax information, such as size of family, income earned, credits, deductions and taxes already paid, can give you a rough snapshot of your tax liability in time to make some adjustments to withholding, which may mean more money in your pocket today.

This also has the benefit of giving people the chance to make more money therefore help the economy to recover which mean the government will increase ss later on.

The sooner you begin saving and investing the better: By starting earlier, you give your money more time to grow, which ultimately means that your kids will have more money for tuition when they graduate from high school.

However, given you have the means to take more risk a generally smarter scheme would be to invest much of the money in a broad liquid bond funds with a somewhat lower percentage in stocks and then reduce the amount of stock each year as you get closer even moving some into cash.

• You get to be public, which means many more people can give you money to invest.

I'm not against this idea by any means but I just don't see how giving congress the power to print money at no interest will not lead to more overspending.

My strategy was if trend goes against you buy in another direction as it means same as stop loss just you not giving money for a big guys, so my 100 dollar in 1 moth grow till 4,500 and final stage it 100 % profit, and after I did with stop loss I lost 100 dollar in 4 days, I did 3 times more and lost every time so in 4 days some in one week, I I was exhausted with stop loss.

Crucially, some elements of the system like loot box contents were randomized — meaning even players who chose to give EA more money could still walk away frustrated.

I've developed a program for decluttering and reorganizing your mental space by not giving a fuck, wherein not giving a fuck means not spending time, energy, and / or money on things that neither make you happy nor improve your life (annoy), so that you have more time, energy, and / or money to devote to the things that do (bring joy).

Which means that they are financially incentivised to collect as few packages as possible since the fewer they collect the less money they have to give back to the consumers that collect the pouches and in turn the more money they keep for themselves.