However, mandating small class sizes
means hiring more teachers to get to an ideal number of students per class.
Not exact matches
Fortunately, since eLearning instructors are not physically constrained in supervising a single classroom at a time, they can handle way
more learners than an old school (pun intended)
teacher ever could — which
means you don't have to
hire as many.
This trend coincided roughly with a
teacher hiring boom here in the United States,
meaning these changes happened despite districts» employing
more teachers, and it's likely to continue as states and districts continue to feel the pressure from unfunded pension and health care promises, which totaled $ 1.38 trillion at last count.
What this
means is,
teachers and students will be
more accessible to persons looking to
hire.
It just
means more hiring, then laying off the same
teachers and punishing taxpayers who needlessly pay for a bloated workforce.
Known in shorthand as «REPA II,» state education officials have advocated for the changes as a
means of providing
more flexibility to administrators in the
teacher hiring process.
In some districts, it may
mean spending millions
more in local dollars to
hire additional
teachers.
That
means that there is
more time for test prep each year which
means more testing prep materials will be bought,
more specialists
hired from companies to tell
teachers how to teach to test...
In 1996 - 97, when the NCTAF report was released, California embarked on an ambitious effort to reduce class sizes, and, since smaller class sizes translate to
more classes overall, this
meant the state had to
hire tens of thousands of additional
teachers.
This
means they have
more flexibility to set curriculum and budgets,
hire and fire
teachers and staff and offer
more customized learning experiences for students.