Sentences with phrase «means killing a person»

War means killing people.

Do we have the right to get rid of the clone, which means killing a person?

Not exact matches

However U.S. commanders say the precision weapons used by the air force have meant an overall decrease in the number of civilian casualties from combat operations as fewer people have been killed in ground fighting.

I don't mean harming or killing in the same way that policemen and women are harmed or killed in the line of duty, obviously, or people who handle hazardous chemicals, or aid workers in war - torn countries.

I always thought it meant that God was greedy and jealous and liked to kill people and knock down their walls and turn them into salt, just like a nasty old man would do.

And none of those were actually killed for Christianity, they were killed by people using Christianity as a means to capture power.

Also, it was easier for people to move great distances, again due to technology, so different nationalities and cultures are bound to collide, and with a greater number of people, that means a greater number of people to kill and be killed.

Does that mean they will kill millions of rich people?

does this mean if Ranger Kristoffer Demanij who was killed in Afghanistan last week on his FOURTEENTH tour, he would still be alive if he had been a Mormon and chose to serve a two - year mission converting people to LDS instead?

The death penalty should be abolished not for religious reasons (also religious people seem to approve of the dath penalty — which to me makes no sense) but because every person who is killed is one less set of DNA to be passed on to succeeding generations, and who knows what those wasted genes could mean for the future of the species?

There are also the objections that there is no national interest in trying to stop the use of a particular kind of weaponry — you can kill people by any means; and that even if there were such an interest, a weak and limited attack will be ineffective.

So if though shalt not kill really means no killing why did god tell mosis to kill so many different people?

If you were a real Christian you would know Christs words speak for themselves and the fact that he didn't take the sword away and turn it into a pruning shear right then and there does not mean he was saying «I mean all this stuff is for later after I come back and kill all the evil people and those who haven't accepted me as their savior so you won't have to fear anyone so you can finally give up your guns and weapons of war...» You disgust me chad.

One means simply «to hang on a cross», but I believe the word crucifixion as used in the Koran means to «kill a person by that means».

I think it means these people who believe this BS will kill themselves otherwise we will all be supporting these bums cause they have nothing left, no money no house nothing.

Harming and killing people IS what morally bad means.

Just because good and bad have no moral basis doesn't mean that it's in your best interest to kill people.

So it other people in other areas survived your flood, it means that either your god was wrong, and he couldn't kill everyone, or he lied and he didn't kill every one.

They didn't mean the moon would turn red... they were talking about a mass killing of people i.e. Armageddon... red as in the fires of hell if you believe in all this bible fantasy crap.

People kill me with some of their comments, just because they don't concern their selves with the outside world doesn't mean they don't know and hear about what's happening in it.

- Well considering you are now cherry picking and not realizing that if you truely believe our «works don't save us» then what you've just told me is that as long as I have faith in god and christ I have carte blanche to go on a rampage and kill people, or be a di.ck, or anything else I want to do because my works on earth apparently mean nothing.

Yeah, so, if I believe in the Bible that means I can go out and kill people and ask for forgiveness.

wait... so you're saying God created a devistating hurricane that killed 23 innocent people so some guy wouldnt steal someones car??? You mean to tell me you're not bothered by that statement?

Actually Brehvik does not consider himself a christian in his words, «in the strictest sense», so the first part of your point is moot... Secondly I think a fairer statement would be that not «all» muslims are violent extremists, as many who don't live in western countries are, as their book does instruct them to kill any and all who do not procalim allah as the one god and mohammed as his prophet... As far as having extreme passion for one's beliefs, if someone was truly to be an «extreme» christian that person would be completely loving as this was Jesus» command to love both God and everyone... to take that to the extreme would mean «extreme» loving, like the radical kind of love that caused Jesus to endure the cross for the sins of us all... includinig the man who committed this atrocity and yes any and all of the muslim's who have committed similar things.

That verse by no means was said to justify killing people who don't believe in Jesus.

I also realize that even if a group of Jewish people killed the man I consider Lord that doesn't mean I should hate the Jewish people and expect their apologies.

I mean, believe in god all you want, but that doesn't mean you have to follow practices and teachings from people who were constantly raping and killing each other and didn't know a damn thing about how the world works outside of their little desert.

I mean the person who kills himself, violently robbing what Fate has allotted, when this is not legally mandated by the state....

Yeah, these people are sooooo holy and after they get to their feet from kneeling, every chance they get, their precious Quran tells them to kill infidels which means all of America.

Instead of killing the people, he could have established a own party, trying to preserve Islamic invasion by political means.

I mean not just ideologically but physically, and people are being enslaved and killed because they are Christians.

Breivik tried to stop Islam with Islamic means (murder), but that will cause the opposite: amplifying the Islamic impact, because the next 20 years they will shout on us: There are also Christian fanatics, killing people.

I mean, you're sitting there, and some nut says something like «oh, atheist dictators do nt kill religious persons because they are atheist, they kill them because they do nt want them worshipping anyone else, all empires do that.»

It seems to me that as a set - apart people, Christians should be wary of cheering on violence as a means to defeating evil, when we know good and well that no amount of killing will ever make evil go away.

The «right» to die actually means, if we're brutally honest, that some people are seeking the legal «right» to kill another human being.

John the baptists callled theh pharasees vipers to give you a clue Jesus called them serpents and viperfs too and Paul after departing form his venomous campaign after killing Stephen and vonverting turned aroudn in Romans chap 0ne saying they had th epoison of asps under their tongues quoting a vewrse in the Psalms... serpents are mean hateful religious people... that's all...

Sure, lots of people get killed, and there is a lot of hate, but those people sure are passionate about their cause and have really given meaning to their lives (short though they may be).

It's that living under law thing that kills us (the Spirit gives life but the letter kills), trying to live up to standards and rules, principles and guidelines, etc... The church these days has pretty much no idea what grace even is, and if you start talking about God's love, I mean his real love based only on Christ's merit, people call you a heretic.

Loving your enemies does not mean that you let them take advantage of other people and even kill them.

Jesus did teach us what love means and it did not look like killing other people.

If you're questioning what the statement meant, the God of the OT has a record of killing people, does He not?

Non-belief that I could not mow my lawn, killed my grass.Non - belief does a person no good.Its an excuse.That's all atheism is.That means its not logical nor do they use logic and reason.

But then, what does this mean for the victims of Hurricane Katrina, or the December 26, 2004 tsunami that killed almost 250,000 people?

That however does not mean that Christianity was responsible for the brutal killing of the hundreds and thousands of innocent people.

We should be concerned for the mental health of anyone who thinks that it is healthy or socially acceptable to find meaning in the ownership of these kinds of tools — not just the people who go the extra yard and actually kill somebody on purpose with one.

okay i don't mean to be mean or anything but you do have to realize that people have to inventually die and events much worse than 9/11 happened in other countries and many times it was america who was the killing people for no reason.

http://religion.blogs.cnn.com/2013/01/18/godless-mom-strikes-a-chord-with-parents/comment-page-140 In arguing that God doesn't kill people, Chad said: «I think you mean «allows to die», just like the millions of other people in the world that are allowed to die by natural causes every year.

People should not kill each other because they are black or white, gay or straight, Arab or American, but should instead rejoice in how God has created persons differently so that new meanings and identities are always possible.

The old «Christianity is evil because Christianity has killed millions» argument... If you read the Bible, there are many times that God commanded His people to destroy other groups of people through, gasp, violent means, because those people had rejected Him completely and were ruining the earth, which He had made.

As the Nazis willfully altered the meaning of German words for ideological reasons, and the Soviet Communists altered the meaning of Russian words (or coined expressions like «former persons) for ideological reasons, so too the advocates of assisted suicide want to banish words like «suicide» and «killing» from discussions of the subject in order to gain an ideological advantage, and same - sex «marriage» advocates want to change the meaning of «marriage» for ideological reasons.