«It sequesters carbon in the soil, meaning less is emitted into the atmosphere, and fewer passes in the field
means less carbon emissions associated with fossil fuel.
Less coal
means less carbon dioxide, so the impact on emissions could be enormous.
But cleaner transport also
means less carbon emissions, both because buses are cleaner, less fuel intensive per passenger mile, and because people are actually leaving their cars for the faster buses.
That means less carbon and lower cost of ownership.
In a fossil fuel - fired generator,
this means less carbon dioxide emissions for the same unit of electricity produced.
This may have been triggered by a 250 - million - year lull in volcanic activity, which would have
meant less carbon dioxide being pumped into the atmosphere, and a reduced greenhouse effect.
• Organic does not
mean less carbon • Bigger is better: Go for the magnum, not the half bottle • Tetra - Pak or bag - in - a-box is better than glass (read a full study on this here)
A carbon fee will
mean less carbon pollution wrecking our lungs and our atmosphere, more investment into energy efficiency solutions, and a faster transition to clean, renewable energy sources.
Not exact matches
That
means that every new cell created has a bit
less carbon - 14 than cells before it.
But while that is a crucial national conversation, the heated pipeline debate sometimes
means we pay a lot
less attention to the kinds of things we should build in Canada if we're serious about reducing
carbon emissions.
Increases in the price of fossil fuels since 1979 have
meant that
less has been burned and
less carbon dioxide has been added to the atmosphere.
serving of Vertical Water has approximately 1/3 the calories, 1/3 the sugar and travels
less than 1/3 the distance from forest to table (that
means that Vertical Water has a smaller
carbon footprint, it is exclusively sourced and bottled in the U.S.).
Local Real Salt comes from right here in the USA, which
means less food miles and a smaller
carbon footprint.
Organic foods are also locally sourced and produced, which
means there is
less carbon dioxide emissions that contribute to global warming.
Thawing permafrost may
mean more CO2 in the atmosphere but
less sea ice may
mean more
carbon captured by the Arctic ocean
It could also
mean rainforests in the future are populated by smaller trees, which store
less carbon, the team says.
As these winds enhance ocean circulation, they may be encouraging
carbon - rich waters to rise from the deep, say the team,
meaning that surface water is
less able to absorb CO2 from the atmosphere.
Replacing some of the lawn with groundcover would
mean spending
less weekend time behind a power mower, which produces more
carbon dioxide, not to mention noise, per mile than any automobile.
Plug - ins use about a third of the fuel that a standard hybrid does, which
means that the cars themselves emit
less carbon dioxide and other pollutants.
But if humans, through
carbon dioxide emissions, are affecting climate
less than we think, would that
mean we may have more time to reduce the harmful effects?
«C4 leaves have
less dense tissues, allowing more leaves to be produced for the same
carbon cost which
means C4 plants invest more in roots than C3 species.»
«A limit to the availability of iron in this region
means that the ocean is
less efficient in its uptake of atmospheric
carbon dioxide,» he said.
GM crops that tolerate herbicides deserve some praise: They help minimize mechanical weed removal, which
means less soil erosion, more
carbon stored in the soil and fewer
carbon emissions from tilling equipment making trips across fields, scientists noted in 2012 in a special issue of Weed Science focused on herbicide - resistance management.
To stick within the two degree target, this
means the budget for
carbon dioxide emissions ends up being
less than the original 1000 billion tonnes.
At the time, he said «the stunning finding that forests can also feed on nitrogen in rocks has the potential to change all projections related to climate change,» because it
meant there could be more
carbon storage on land and
less in the atmosphere than climate models say.
Capturing more
carbon means less ends up in the atmosphere to warm the planet — this is the negative feedback loop.
So more
carbon dioxide
means less carbonates for shell building by swimming snails and other creatures.
That
means less sediment is eroded from the uplands and
less carbon can be buried.
Local Real Salt comes from right here in the USA, which
means less food miles and a smaller
carbon footprint.
Unfortunately, most purified MCT oils on the market forget about the longest
carbon chain fatty acid and contain far
less lauric acid, which
means you're losing out on one of the better medium chain fatty acids that are normally found in coconut oil.
Local The clay comes from right here in the USA, which
means less miles and a smaller
carbon footprint.
The clay comes from right here in the USA, which
means less miles and a smaller
carbon footprint
Reducing our
carbon emissions by 80 per cent isn't going to
mean we just do or have 80 per cent
less stuff — we need to focus on doing things differently, or doing different things.
That
means a set of 22 ″ alloys which weigh 5.5 kg
less each than the SVR's standard — despite being a half inch wider — and a
carbon fibre bonnet for a further saving of 5 kg.
Being of the
carbon ceramic kind, this
means they dissipate heat far better than traditional steel rotors and weigh significantly
less, virtually being fade - resistant and adding life expectancy.
Despite having
less power than most of the opposition, its compact size and advanced construction from
carbon - fibre and aluminium
means it can match rivals for performance.
Like the Challenger SRT Hellcat the R8 Competition tops out at 199 - mph, but unlike the Dodge its standard all - wheel drive system makes getting there a lot
less frightening - and its
carbon ceramic brakes
mean you won't set the front wheels on fire when it's time to slow things down to a more reasonable rate of travel.
That would
mean 45 million
less cars to clog the street and 270 million
less pounds of
carbon deposited in the atmosphere.
However, that
means we get the answer that there was
less carbon released than if it had been, say, organic
carbon -LRB--20 o / oo rather than -60 o / oo).
And remember, energy is far from the dominant component of the economy, and phasing in a 50 or 75 % reduction in
carbon emissions doesn't
mean a 50 to 75 % reduction in energy usage — still
less a 50 to 75 % reduction in productive use of energy, given likely efficiency gains.
«This agreement will
mean less of the
carbon pollution that threatens our planet, and more of the jobs and economic growth driven by low -
carbon investment,» President Obama said today at a press conference.
Polar ocean is sucking up
less carbon dioxide Windy waters may
mean less greenhouse gas is stored at sea.
It would also
mean the damages resulting from
carbon dioxide emissions would be
less for every ton of CO2 emitted (~ 20 tons of CO2 annually per capita in the US).
Conservatives should embrace a
carbon tax (a much
less costly
means of reducing greenhouse gas emissions) in return for elimination of EPA regulatory authority over greenhouse gas emissions, abolition of green energy subsidies and regulatory mandates, and offsetting tax cuts to provide for revenue neutrality.
In simple terms, offsetting one tonne of
carbon means there will be one
less tonne of
carbon dioxide in the atmosphere than there would otherwise have been.
It
means far
less harmful
carbon pollution will be emitted in the coming years.
And it
means less climate - disrupting
carbon pollution pumped into our air.
That
means less smoke which equals smaller
carbon footprint than just burning wood in a fireplace which is like 10 % efficient according to sierraclub.org.
We know that the warming effect of atmospheric
carbon dioxide is logarithmic (
meaning each additional unit has
less effect than the one preceding) and estimates of warming due to increased
carbon dioxide since the Industrial Revolution are really quite small.
If Pruitt choses to replace the CPP with a
less rigorous regulation, it could
mean the EPA would delay or abandoned efforts to fight the 2009 endangerment finding, which orders the agency to regulate
carbon as a public health threat.