Sentences with phrase «means less goals»

Not exact matches

My goal here is to amass as much bitcoin as possible for less than I can buy it at market price — within my means, of course.

Garnering less enthusiasm were considerations such as asset allocation strategy (balancing an investment portfolio to take into account goals, risk tolerance and length of time), with a mean of 4.7, and understanding price - earning ratios for traded stock, which saw a mean of 4.3.

Less risk means we'll have less money — but still enough to achieve our goLess risk means we'll have less money — but still enough to achieve our goless money — but still enough to achieve our goals.

It means cooking out on the grill, digging out our crimson sweatshirts, nearly peeing in our pants after a last - second field goal attempt, and falling asleep on the couch to the sound of the crowd noise from another, less consequential (Big 10) game.

These groups were less concerned about market fluctuations and more concerned with issues of social equity, environmental health and having fun, which meant they unwittingly epitomised the goals of political ecology, by challenging the dominant agricultural methods of production and marketing.

This means we scored three goals less than the champions, four less than the team from which the golden boot winner came from.

THat should mean that Giroud's own lack of pace is even less of an issue and should see the Gunners go goal crazy.

In addition Welbeck's goal conversion rate from passes is even less than Giroud (I mean he misses more chances), so with Sanchez out, I thought it was vital to start Walcott

You know know he means business, When Arsene signed Xhaka (long ball master) and now vardy (counter attacking wizard) on top of Ozil and Alexis, Change of tactics of curse, with those in the line up I expect us to play faster and more direct, and I also expect us to lick less goals.

That means that it has taken on average less than half an hour for one, the other or both to score or set up a goal when playing together.

Lukaku would be a good fit for us, he's proven himself that he can get the goals in the EPL while playing for lesser sides Everton and West Brom at Arsenal he'll have Ozil and Cazorla giving him killer passes which means more goals!

This is an incredibly difficult question to answer for a variety of reasons, most importantly because over the years our once vaunted «beautiful» style of play has become a shadow of it's former self, only to be replaced by a less than stellar «plug and play» mentality where players play out of position and adjustments / substitutions are rarely forthcoming before the 75th minute... if you look at our current players, very few would make sense in the traditional Wengerian system... at present, we don't have the personnel to move the ball quickly from deep - lying position, efficient one touch midfielders that can make the necessary through balls or the disciplined and pacey forwards to stretch defences into wide positions, without the aid of the backs coming up into the final 3rd, so that we can attack the defensive lanes in the same clinical fashion we did years ago... on this current squad, we have only 1 central defender on staf, Mustafi, who seems to have any prowess in the offensive zone or who can even pass two zones through so that we can advance play quickly out of our own end (I have seen some inklings that suggest Holding might have some offensive qualities but too early to tell)... unfortunately Mustafi has a tendency to get himself in trouble when he gets overly aggressive on the ball... from our backs out wide, we've seen pace from the likes of Bellerin and Gibbs and the spirited albeit offensively stunted play of Monreal, but none of these players possess the skill - set required in the offensive zone for the new Wenger scheme which requires deft touches, timely runs to the baseline and consistent crossing, especially when Giroud was playing and his ratio of scored goals per clear chances was relatively low (better last year though)... obviously I like Bellerin's future prospects, as you can't teach pace, but I do worry that he regressed last season, which was obvious to Wenger because there was no way he would have used Ox as the right side wing - back so often knowing that Barcelona could come calling in the off - season, if he thought otherwise... as for our midfielders, not a single one, minus the more confident Xhaka I watched played for the Swiss national team a couple years ago, who truly makes sense under the traditional Wenger model... Ramsey holds onto the ball too long, gives the ball away cheaply far too often and abandons his defensive responsibilities on a regular basis (doesn't score enough recently to justify): that being said, I've always thought he does possess a little something special, unfortunately he thinks so too... Xhaka is a little too slow to ever boss the midfield and he tends to telegraph his one true strength, his long ball play: although I must admit he did get a bit better during some points in the latter part of last season... it always made me wonder why whenever he played with Coq Wenger always seemed to play Francis in a more advanced role on the pitch... as for Coq, he is way too reckless at the wrong times and has exhibited little offensive prowess yet finds himself in and around the box far too often... let's face it Wenger was ready to throw him in the trash heap when injuries forced him to use Francis and then he had the nerve to act like this was all part of a bigger Wenger constructed plan... he like Ramsey, Xhaka and Elneny don't offer the skills necessary to satisfy the quick transitory nature of our old offensive scheme or the stout defensive mindset needed to protect the defensive zone so that our offensive players can remain aggressive in the final third... on the front end, we have Ozil, a player of immense skill but stunted by his physical demeanor that tends to offend, the fact that he's been played out of position far too many times since arriving and that the players in front of him, minus Sanchez, make little to no sense considering what he has to offer (especially Giroud); just think about the quick counter-attack offence in Real or the space and protection he receives in the German National team's midfield, where teams couldn't afford to focus too heavily on one individual... this player was a passing «specialist» long before he arrived in North London, so only an arrogant or ignorant individual would try to reinvent the wheel and / or not surround such a talent with the necessary components... in regards to Ox, Walcott and Welbeck, although they all possess serious talents I see them in large part as headless chickens who are on the injury table too much, lack the necessary first - touch and / or lack the finishing flair to warrant their inclusion in a regular starting eleven; I would say that, of the 3, Ox showed the most upside once we went to a back 3, but even he became a bit too consumed by his pending contract talks before the season ended and that concerned me a bit... if I had to choose one of those 3 players to stay on it would be Ox due to his potential as a plausible alternative to Bellerin in that wing - back position should we continue to use that formation... in Sanchez, we get one of the most committed skill players we've seen on this squad for some years but that could all change soon, if it hasn't already of course... strangely enough, even he doesn't make sense given the constructs of the original Wenger offensive model because he holds onto the ball too long and he will give the ball up a little too often in the offensive zone... a fact that is largely forgotten due to his infectious energy and the fact that the numbers he has achieved seem to justify the means... finally, and in many ways most crucially, Giroud, there is nothing about this team or the offensive system that Wenger has traditionally employed that would even suggest such a player would make sense as a starter... too slow, too inefficient and way too easily dispossessed... once again, I think he has some special skills and, at times, has showed some world - class qualities but he's lack of mobility is an albatross around the necks of our offence... so when you ask who would be our best starting 11, I don't have a clue because of the 5 or 6 players that truly deserve a place in this side, 1 just arrived, 3 aren't under contract beyond 2018 and the other was just sold to Juve... man, this is theraputic because following this team is like an addiction to heroin without the benefits

Bendtner or Chamakh would still have been considered average even if they scored 25goals because they had average talent.For all the potential Bendtner had he never maximised it so as long asit wasn't developed he's still average.I mean it's possoble for an average player to score 25 goals when given the chances and possible for a world class striker to score less than that.Quality is a talent which may be linked to stats but does not necessarily show on stats.Take Ox for example, if you looked at his stats you might think he's average but he's not.Look at Lukaku, he's scored many goals for Everton yetmany people here think he's not gpod enough for Arsenal because they look at the quality and talent andnot just the goals.

Despite the hype that surrounded him when he signed, Spaniard Morata has only been able to bag a total of 14 goals and five assists in 40 appearances, meaning that he directly contributes to less than a goal every two games, a poor return for a player of his ability.

I must say though that if we did have those extra ten goals you talk about it could mean ten less from our midfield as games go a certain way when trying to hold a lead and so forth.

But when he plays to accommodate the striker his goal threat reduces, it doesn't mean he's any less of a player it just means he's a team player and let's the striker get the goals.

Mike Gundy: When I took this thing over, I said my goal is, one, to erase a lifetime losing winning percentage here — meaning that, up until a couple of years ago, Oklahoma State has always had a less than 50 percent winning percentage [all - time].

Close analysis of all the rest of the names will flag up inconsistency, skewed goal - scoring records in lesser bully - boy leagues, inability to adapt to new systems / teams / countries, inexperience, inflated price tags, entirely different types of strikers that would mean changing our system etc..

All players should give 100 % in every game and if that means running non stop for 90 minutes plus or taking the ball in the face to stop a goal bound effort from the opposition then so be it, us fans should expect nothing less weather or not we are fans of Arsenal, Leicester or whoever, the players get paid thousands to do what i did for fun growing up only i ran for longer than these so called professionals.

In the Premier League, they've scored 73 goals, just five less than they managed last season, meaning they average 2.35 goals per game.

Surprisingly, when all 3 played together the Gunners had a meaner defence, conceding less than a goal per game at 0.75 goals per game, and collecting more points than any other central defensive partnership, at 2.09 points per game.

Playing less than 30 minutes a game hasn't really slowed down her scoring (3G, 1A), so you'd have to figure that more minutes would mean more goals for Stelbasky.

It's seems to be an alien concept with our back four at the moment that defending properly might mean we concede less goals.

This could end up meaning the game is a little less exciting than some people hope, as the Blues look to pick their moments, unless there's an early goal really open things up.

Being goal oriented also means that toddlers are much less distractible than they may have been earlier.

The UBC Sauder School of Business study, published in the Journal of Consumer Psychology, found that bargain - hunters who adopt a «price - conscious mentality» — meaning their main goal is to save money and get the cheapest deal — tend to see employees who they interact with as less human.

The goal is less blood sugar means less insulin spiking, which is a good thing.

Taking in less means making better dietary decisions by being mindful of goals and aware of the challenges that are a part of losing weight after 50.

So the goal is, if you pee 90 % or more, it means your iodine levels are saturated; if you pee less than 90 %, right?

of lean body mass = 15 — 30 gm daily • Proteins and carbs have 4 calories / gram which means the total amount of calories so far is (150 + 30 -LCB- or less -RCB--RRB- x 4 = 720 calories • Fat intake will be measured according to how many calories are leftover to reach the 2000 calories / day goal (2000 — 720 = 1280), and since 1 gm of fat has 9 calories, 1280/9 = 142 gm / day is the amount of total fat intake for one day

Less rest means more fat burning, but make sure to work your way toward this goal.

Note that one avocado has 29 grams of fat: http://nutritiondata.self.com/facts/fruits-and-fruit-juices/1843/2 If the goal is to consume only 3 grams or less per serving, this means that one avocado has 10 or more servings in one avocado.

For me that means my goal is less than 20 net carbs and less than 35 total carbs.

On the vertical axis, an intake of less than 100 % line means that an individual logged less than their goal for the day.

But fearing failure will only hold you back, potentially meaning you're less likely to achieve your goals.

Lost muscle means less strength, less aesthetically pleasing final result (skinny fat is not really anyone's goal), and decreased metabolic activity, which will slow potential fat loss.

Our Compatibility Matching System ® takes a scientific approach to matching you with people who share your goals, desires, and lifestyle, meaning local dating feels less like meaninglessly meeting scores of singles in Milwaukee and more like spending genuine quality time with your other half.

Why Expertise Matters To This Business: If Cityville can get their entire 5000 member team trained and prepared to safely transition their operations to digital, it means this municipality can quickly reap the large cost savings of going paperless sooner, can offer easier access to information and services for their public faster, and can achieve their goal of generating less paper waste by 2018.

Publicly funded pre-K is often touted as a means to narrow achievement gaps, but this goal is less likely to be achieved if poor / minority children do not, at a minimum, attend equal quality pre-K as their non - poor / non-minority peers.

As for having a «minimum wage» and becoming a full - time writer sooner — or setting a minimum for $ 2.99 would mean I'd sell less overall and reach my goal later.

Having fewer monthly expenses also means you have to save less money overall to meet the three months of living expenses goal.

Conversely, others do not realize that accomplishing their goals may mean taking on less risk than they believe they can handle.

This also means he can withdraw less than the original $ 60,000 to meet his goal.

A shorter fixed term means a higher payment, but it also equates to a lot less interest and a home that is free and clear that much faster, assuming that's one of your financial goals.

If the number in the table is 10 years or less, that means you can get to the 10 by 10 goal.

I mean, killing my mortgage in less than 10 years is my main financial goal (we are already down 7 % in less than 8 months...) but this won't bring me any dividends... It'll just lower my expenses... (unless I buy another house and rent the current house...) So in a Growing your dividends point of view, I am unsure of my own strategy...

A shorter - term goal means you should purchase a more conservative investment (as in, one that might have lower returns, but is less risky).

@AspiringProGenji Don't mean to play devil's advocate here, because I think this is one of the rare games that does open world right, but it actually makes less sense for Kratos and his son to be randomly exploring different realms that have absolutely nothing to do with their goal, especially considering the writers go out of their way to let the player know that Kratos does not like to be distracted by trivialities.

Efficiency is the goal, sending a full load means less time wasted counting on the other end and a quicker turnaround for that team for you.

So on the one hand it means you might forfeit less goals on your team, but on the other hand it means that it's pretty difficult to beat the keeper in one - on - one situations if you don't know what you're doing.