Sentences with phrase «means less greenhouse gases»

On the other hand, the fact that we're transitioning from coal to natural gas means less greenhouse gases.

Polar ocean is sucking up less carbon dioxide Windy waters may mean less greenhouse gas is stored at sea.

In certain jurisdictions, energy generation is a major source of carbon emissions, so switching to renewable energy sources like solar and wind will mean less greenhouse gas emissions.

Not exact matches

And of course, the gain means less oil consumed and fewer greenhouse gases emitted.

More greenhouse gas in the atmosphere means less heat escaping and a warming planet.

«That means less land use, feedstock, nutrients, greenhouse gases, excretion — all positive effects on the environment.»

Reducing the need for paper products means less demand for tree cutting — this prevents deforestation, protects wildlife habitats, reduces pollution and other negative effects of paper industry, the third - largest industrial emitter of greenhouse gasses.

That means, in turn, less land required to grow the feed for animals, lower greenhouse gas emissions, and less water pollution.

Less heavy to transport, meaning less transport cost and less greenhouse gasses produced from transpLess heavy to transport, meaning less transport cost and less greenhouse gasses produced from transpless transport cost and less greenhouse gasses produced from transpless greenhouse gasses produced from transport;

This means that there will be less ocean plants to uptake this greenhouse gas, which worsens the overall problem, Behrenfeld said.

Conservatives should embrace a carbon tax (a much less costly means of reducing greenhouse gas emissions) in return for elimination of EPA regulatory authority over greenhouse gas emissions, abolition of green energy subsidies and regulatory mandates, and offsetting tax cuts to provide for revenue neutrality.

JimD, «This slower rate of warming — relative to climate model projections — means there is less urgency to phase out greenhouse gas emissions now»

And emissions reductions are much less valuable (to this administration), meaning that any greenhouse gas regulation will be less beneficial.

-- Yes, it may be correct in so far as they can say that; «around 10 % of the wavebands emitted by IR radiation are made up of wave - lengths that can not be absorbed by «Greenhouse Gases» (GHGs), but that can not possibly mean that 0.04 %, in the case of CO2 concentration but certainly less than 10 % of the Atmosphere as a total has got what must be a «supernatural» ability to stop LWR.

In fact, the average resident of Manhattan uses much less energy, and has a much smaller carbon footprintAmount of carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases that a person, community, industry, or other entity contributes to the atmosphere through energy use, transportation, and other means.

Our assessment of the future risk from the continued build up of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere is even less informed by 20th century changes in global mean temperature.

While less meat gets wasted than does fruit and vegetables, the amount of energy required to produce meat is «significantly» more than that for plant - based food production, which means that the associated greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from meat production is also much higher, leading researchers to indicate that meat waste has a «greater negative environmental impact.»

If each province in China was to declare itself an independent country tomorrow — each producing much less greenhouse gasses than the whole of China — would this mean that all of the new states would have a much reduced responsibility to lessen their greenhouse gas production rates?

This means that the impact of greenhouse gases can accumulate and intensify over time, while the aerosol effects become comparatively less important on longer time scales due to the accumulation of carbon dioxide.