In northern California,
that means less precipitation.
An erroneous correlation between glacial phases and pluvial phases in the tropics has been widely accepted in the past, although cold ocean water
means less precipitation, not more.
Not exact matches
In that case (along with greater
precipitation, and the
precipitation belt moving to higher latitudes), there could be more snow in the winter & greater melting in the summer (in higher latitudes), while I'd think the lower latitudes (with
less precip) and the local
mean temp being higher, would melt the glaciers faster, without adequate snowfall & low winter temps to slow this glacial decrease.
As Isaac says, global
mean precipitation is a
less useful summary statistic than global
mean temperature, if you are interested in what life will be like in a doubled CO2 world.
The net change over land accounts for 24 % of the global
mean increase in
precipitation, a little
less than the areal proportion of land (29 %).
This
means that many populated zones will receive
less precipitation.
And if there's
less precipitation that could
mean less snow cover as well - on the short time scales of a year or two while the effect is still being felt.
Snowpack is melting earlier as winter and spring temperatures rise, and in most states an increasing percentage of winter
precipitation is falling as rain,
meaning there is often
less snowpack to begin with.
Less humidity in the air means less local rain and less precipitation replenishing glaciers and riv
Less humidity in the air
means less local rain and less precipitation replenishing glaciers and riv
less local rain and
less precipitation replenishing glaciers and riv
less precipitation replenishing glaciers and rivers.
Previous studies on the modification of
precipitation trends by quantile mapping have focused on
mean quantities, with
less attention paid to extremes.