Sentences with phrase «means less set»

Not exact matches

This will set off a vicious cycle of higher deficits that lead to higher debt, which in turn will mean higher interest costs and less funding available for healthcare, education and other provincial services.

Unfortunately, this can be tricky to set up, and this has meant that many VoIP and UC solutions in practice settle on the less secure RTP protocol instead.

In this context ethical «tone» means the mood or tenor that a leader sets with regard to choices between right and wrong, between more and less admirable forms of behaviour.

That means less swiping, more of a social - media vibe, and a $ 7 - a-month fee for the full feature set.

That can be a daunting target, but even having a little bit set aside can mean you rely less on credit to cover an emergency, said Bruce McClary, a spokesman for the National Foundation for Credit Counseling.

However, the decline in the real neutral rate means that any given setting of our policy rate will be less stimulative today than it was a decade or two ago.

But once you arrive at a keyword list based on some of your existing keywords (especially those with high demand but potentially unfavorable overlap with less qualified meanings) you can set the additional phrase or word as a negative keyword to your ad group.

The death penalty should be abolished not for religious reasons (also religious people seem to approve of the dath penalty — which to me makes no sense) but because every person who is killed is one less set of DNA to be passed on to succeeding generations, and who knows what those wasted genes could mean for the future of the species?

On this suggestion, «emancipation» means the opportunity to be creative, the measure of power that «issues from coordination,» and individuals are more or less emancipated depending on the natural and human context in which their lives are set.

Whereas the principle set forth in Deuteronomy may provide some means of measuring the accuracy of the predictions of an astrologer like Jeane Dixon or the lucrative prognostications of a dispensationalist like Hal Lindsey, it is less well suited to discerning the reliability of a call to moral judgment and decisive action.

On the other hand, God must so act in the interests of both the self and all others as thereby to establish the cosmic order of natural law that sets the optimal limits of all other action, where by «optimal limits» I mean limits such that, were they to be set otherwise than they are, the ratio between opportunities for good and risks of evil would be less rather than more favorable than it in fact is.

«To believe» that we belong to God, means no less than to be crucified with Jesus Christ, knowing that he had to die for us, trusting that he really died for us — really for you — and therewith setting aside all that separates us from God.

This recipe means I can take 10 minutes on a less busy night, set the slow cooker to go when I leave and have dinner ready when I get home.

This meant I had to set up my huge (HOT) fluorescent lights in my teeny tiny kitchen and try to snap a few decent photos in less than favorable conditions.

That means less shelf space for manufacturers» brands, putting even more price pressure on an increasingly desperate set of suppliers.

That means that it has taken on average less than half an hour for one, the other or both to score or set up a goal when playing together.

This is an incredibly difficult question to answer for a variety of reasons, most importantly because over the years our once vaunted «beautiful» style of play has become a shadow of it's former self, only to be replaced by a less than stellar «plug and play» mentality where players play out of position and adjustments / substitutions are rarely forthcoming before the 75th minute... if you look at our current players, very few would make sense in the traditional Wengerian system... at present, we don't have the personnel to move the ball quickly from deep - lying position, efficient one touch midfielders that can make the necessary through balls or the disciplined and pacey forwards to stretch defences into wide positions, without the aid of the backs coming up into the final 3rd, so that we can attack the defensive lanes in the same clinical fashion we did years ago... on this current squad, we have only 1 central defender on staf, Mustafi, who seems to have any prowess in the offensive zone or who can even pass two zones through so that we can advance play quickly out of our own end (I have seen some inklings that suggest Holding might have some offensive qualities but too early to tell)... unfortunately Mustafi has a tendency to get himself in trouble when he gets overly aggressive on the ball... from our backs out wide, we've seen pace from the likes of Bellerin and Gibbs and the spirited albeit offensively stunted play of Monreal, but none of these players possess the skill - set required in the offensive zone for the new Wenger scheme which requires deft touches, timely runs to the baseline and consistent crossing, especially when Giroud was playing and his ratio of scored goals per clear chances was relatively low (better last year though)... obviously I like Bellerin's future prospects, as you can't teach pace, but I do worry that he regressed last season, which was obvious to Wenger because there was no way he would have used Ox as the right side wing - back so often knowing that Barcelona could come calling in the off - season, if he thought otherwise... as for our midfielders, not a single one, minus the more confident Xhaka I watched played for the Swiss national team a couple years ago, who truly makes sense under the traditional Wenger model... Ramsey holds onto the ball too long, gives the ball away cheaply far too often and abandons his defensive responsibilities on a regular basis (doesn't score enough recently to justify): that being said, I've always thought he does possess a little something special, unfortunately he thinks so too... Xhaka is a little too slow to ever boss the midfield and he tends to telegraph his one true strength, his long ball play: although I must admit he did get a bit better during some points in the latter part of last season... it always made me wonder why whenever he played with Coq Wenger always seemed to play Francis in a more advanced role on the pitch... as for Coq, he is way too reckless at the wrong times and has exhibited little offensive prowess yet finds himself in and around the box far too often... let's face it Wenger was ready to throw him in the trash heap when injuries forced him to use Francis and then he had the nerve to act like this was all part of a bigger Wenger constructed plan... he like Ramsey, Xhaka and Elneny don't offer the skills necessary to satisfy the quick transitory nature of our old offensive scheme or the stout defensive mindset needed to protect the defensive zone so that our offensive players can remain aggressive in the final third... on the front end, we have Ozil, a player of immense skill but stunted by his physical demeanor that tends to offend, the fact that he's been played out of position far too many times since arriving and that the players in front of him, minus Sanchez, make little to no sense considering what he has to offer (especially Giroud); just think about the quick counter-attack offence in Real or the space and protection he receives in the German National team's midfield, where teams couldn't afford to focus too heavily on one individual... this player was a passing «specialist» long before he arrived in North London, so only an arrogant or ignorant individual would try to reinvent the wheel and / or not surround such a talent with the necessary components... in regards to Ox, Walcott and Welbeck, although they all possess serious talents I see them in large part as headless chickens who are on the injury table too much, lack the necessary first - touch and / or lack the finishing flair to warrant their inclusion in a regular starting eleven; I would say that, of the 3, Ox showed the most upside once we went to a back 3, but even he became a bit too consumed by his pending contract talks before the season ended and that concerned me a bit... if I had to choose one of those 3 players to stay on it would be Ox due to his potential as a plausible alternative to Bellerin in that wing - back position should we continue to use that formation... in Sanchez, we get one of the most committed skill players we've seen on this squad for some years but that could all change soon, if it hasn't already of course... strangely enough, even he doesn't make sense given the constructs of the original Wenger offensive model because he holds onto the ball too long and he will give the ball up a little too often in the offensive zone... a fact that is largely forgotten due to his infectious energy and the fact that the numbers he has achieved seem to justify the means... finally, and in many ways most crucially, Giroud, there is nothing about this team or the offensive system that Wenger has traditionally employed that would even suggest such a player would make sense as a starter... too slow, too inefficient and way too easily dispossessed... once again, I think he has some special skills and, at times, has showed some world - class qualities but he's lack of mobility is an albatross around the necks of our offence... so when you ask who would be our best starting 11, I don't have a clue because of the 5 or 6 players that truly deserve a place in this side, 1 just arrived, 3 aren't under contract beyond 2018 and the other was just sold to Juve... man, this is theraputic because following this team is like an addiction to heroin without the benefits

Nothing like one underachiever blowing smoke up the ass of another... we know that Ozil has some incredible technical gifts, but to be considered the best you have to bring more than just assists to the table... for me, a top player has to possess a more well - rounded game, which doesn't mean they need to be a beast on both ends of the pitch, but they must have the ability to take their game to another level when it matters most... although he amassed some record - like stats early on, it set the bar too high, so when people expected him to duplicate those numbers each year the pressure seemed to get the best of our soft - spoken star... obviously that's not an excuse for what has happened in the meantime, but it's important to make note of a few things: (1) his best year was a transition year for many of the traditionally dominant teams in the EPL, so that clearly made the numbers appear better than they actually were and (2) Wenger's system, or lack thereof, didn't do him any favours; by playing him out of position and by not acquiring world - class striker and / or right - side forward that would best fit an Ozil - centered offensive scheme certainly hurt his chances to repeat his earlier peformances, (3) the loss of Cazorla, who took a lot of pressure off Ozil in the midfield and was highly efficient when it came to getting him the ball in space, negatively impacted his effectiveness and (4) he likewise missed a good chunk of games and frankly never looked himself when he eventually returned to the field... overall the Ozil experiment has had mixed reviews and rightfully so, but I do have some empathy for the man because he has always carried himself the same way, whether for Real or the German National team, yet he has only suffered any lengthy down periods with Arsenal... to me that goes directly to this club's inability to surround him with the necessary players to succeed, especially for someone who is a pass first type of player; as such, this simply highlights our club's ineffective and antiquated transfer policies... frankly I'm disappointed in both Ozil and our management team for not stepping up when it counted because they had a chance to do something special, but they didn't have it in them... there is no one that better exemplifies our recent history than Ozil, brief moments of greatness undercut by long periods of disappointing play, only made worse by his mopey posturing like a younger slightly less awkward Wenger... what a terribly waste

It doesn't mean the Masters setting is any less tense or pressure - filled for the players.

Keeping Giroud on this squad with the promise of substantial playing time... the offensive tactics of this squad is way too indirect and is much more reflective of a hold up play / cross in the box scheme that suits Giroud's skill - sets but can't continue if Wenger really wants Lacazette to be successful... without Sanchez on the pitch this offence is a little bit like a headless chicken, passing sideways, providing relatively poor service to undersized players and sub-par finishing... this isn't to suggest that Arsenal can't perform without Alexis but this offensive scheme is antiquated and ill - advised, especially considering our personnel (poor man's Barca)... if Arsenal doesn't want to pay the price to get topnotch players so we can press high and play all out attack, we would be better served by adopting a counterattack approach... unfortunately that would mean developing a far less skittish defensive group that could withstand the pressure and we all know that Wenger hasn't opted for that approach considering our defensive pickups in recent years and the lack of a «boss» in the midfield

Andy, does this mean that you set such a low standard for all new recruits or just the ones from a lower or lesser league?

The frequency with which a mother would have to pump to well - establish her supply without a baby setting / calibrating it is not meant to be accomplished by a lesser pump.

And when it comes to eating, that means doing away with structured mealtimes in favor of a less structured alternative that happens not at set times, but whenever a child is hungry.»

Keeping a set schedule means that children tend to wake up at the same time every day, eat their meals at the same time, and give parents less trouble when going down for naps and bedtime because they know what to expect.

Many sleepwear sets are made of jersey, a stretchy and very comfortable fabric, and most maternity sleepwear designers are making their products of organic materials, which means less toxicity for both mother and baby.

The system is easy to set up, easy to use and easy to empty - meaning mums and dads can spend less time changing and more time with baby.

Alright, parents, let's get real: no one sets out to raise a brat, but that doesn't mean children who are less than well - behaved don't exist.

The system is easy to set up, easy to use and easy to empty, meaning you can spend less time changing and more time with baby.

The plan sets out national ambitions to: Reduce adult (aged 18 or over) smoking prevalence in England to 18.5 per cent or less by the end of 2015 (from 21.2 per cent), meaning around 210,000 fewer smokers a year.

But being mayor would mean «jet - setting around the world» and much less time with her 10 grand - children.

They claim the government's failure to «phase - in'the changes means women who happen to turn 60 before the set date will receive a state pension worth # 1,000 a year less.

Miliband's comments came as he set out Labour's first plans for cuts to the welfare system, ending out - of - work benefits for roughly 100,000 18 - to 21 - year - olds and replacing them with a less costly means - tested payment dependent on training.

«During fieldwork nowadays, researchers often take turns standing watch for bears, meaning one less set of hands to collect samples.»

If one or more of the track sets appears less crisply outlined than the others, that means the soil conditions under which the tracks were made varied — and therefore that a significant time interval passed between the animals» journeys.

Swanton's new lab set out to identify specific genes that, when inhibited, result in the death of tumor cells that displayed aneuploidy, meaning they had more or less than the normal set of 46 chromosomes.

When you work out in the heat, your body shuttles more blood to the skin in order to help heat escape — meaning less blood flows to the muscles and brain, causing fatigue to set in faster.

Having a set list means I can zip through the store in a lot less time.

If you can do between 15 - 20 sets in less than an hour, that means you're training at a good pace.

«Less is more» in bodybuilding means that you don't have train until you're near - unconscious to make great gains, performing 20 different exercises for one body part won't give you better results than opting for a wise selection of 5 and focusing on doing them with the proper form, weight and rep range, training twice every day won't make you grow faster but it will set you back instead and....

Ultimately, operating from a survival state means your life is driven by unconscious impulses that serve only to get you away from an immediate threat, not to set you up for success down the road, which can lead to less than optimal decisions in a moment of panic.

Proper rest means being able to the same amount of reps (or slightly less) than the previous set.

This means with less amount of exercises, repetitions and sets you can get the same results as if you did hundreds of crunches.

This means you can do less sets of different exercises and make better results.

A better approach is to cut back on the sets and reps. Less volume means you recover faster.

And compared to vegetables, they're less nutritious and higher in carbohydrates, which means they can cause that inflammatory spike in blood sugar levels that sets the blood sugar roller coaster into motion if you consume too much.

2017 is setting up to be a very uncertain year, so I think people are going to crave peace and comfort in their homes — which means less jarring color and more soft, pastel tones and grey - ed down colors.

Setting a prime example here, for the idea that just because a piece of clothing didn't just hit stores, doesn't mean it's less special.

«Quiet on the set» took on new meaning in John Krasinski's horror film, which used a less - is - more approach to its unusual sound design.

Buscemi is the least grass - fed of actors, meant for the rat - run of city streets, and, if I didn't quite believe in him as a country guy, I believed even less in Chloë Sevigny as a cynical jockey with a set of broken bones.

Yes, audiences should expect a dramatically different big screen interpretation of the iconic Hasbro action figure when the film goes into production next month, mainly because it is set in the 1980s and Bumblebee will be the sole focus of the film — meaning a lot less money will likely be spent on visual effects.