Sentences with phrase «means nothing other»

So maybe over dinner casually you can tell her that that's my nickname for you and it means nothing other than we are good pals.

As far as I can tell, it really means nothing other than the fact that if you take a Subsidized Stafford loan each of the 4 years that you attend college, you get to experience the fluctuation (highs and lows) of interest rates over those years.

The large number of draws against mediocre teams means nothing other than that Arsenal have been very mediocre themselves this season.

It means nothing other than they are working hard.

Start living a self absorbed life that means nothing other than fulfilling your own needs.

Such a mission does not lead to syncretism and eclecticism but to «such growth in the essentials» as Asoka had demanded from the different religions, and that means nothing other than growth in love toward God and man.

And your arrogant indignation means nothing other than to demonstrate a lack of maturity.

For in the sense in which he uses the term «literal» in the other passages in which he affirms the same categorial terms to have a literal rather than either a symbolic or an analogical meaning, it means nothing other than «univocal» (although, as we shall see presently, this is not the only sense in which he uses the term «literal»).

«Here, unlike the concept familiar in the science of religion, myth means nothing other than the report by ardent enthusiasts of that which has befallen them.»

«I calmly let the fire burn, for I see that what is consumed is only the fanciful portraits of Life - of - Jesus theology, and that means nothing other than «Christ after the flesh.»

Man can be commanded to love God since this means nothing other than the actualization of the existing relationship of faith to Him.

In the Talmud, the fundamental Jewish legal text, there is an extended discussion about the phrase «eye for an eye,» with multiple rabbis arguing, and the text concluding, that the phrase means nothing other than financial compensation.

shows these pre season games mean nothing other than to get some match fitness and meet fans from around the world

When you have dedicated episodes of these guys taking shelter from a storm, an entire episode with an awful hipstery filter fest, even more cringy dialogue and ridiculous death scenes that mean nothing other than just being shocking and violent; well that's when the show suffers.

Should La La Land come away with the statue, as I strongly suspect it will, it will mean nothing other than that it was a terrific film.

Not exact matches

Some call it purpose, others divine inspiration, but when we reach our life's destiny and we become who we were meant to be there's nothing like it.

Once you've settled upon it, devote one hour every day to nothing but working on your big plan — maybe that means «forgetting» your BlackBerry in the other room and going offline.

Those are other labels that people think signify a food is healthier, but once again the labels mean nothing.

The Guaranteed Income Supplement was meant to be in place only long enough to help the people who reached 65 before the full Canada Pension Plan pensions became available and who would have little or nothing other than Old Age Security, and perhaps a reduced Canada Pension Plan pension, to live on.

That means that nothing should stand in the way of the continued adoption of Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies.

«He's an egomaniac devoid of all moral sense» ---- said the society woman dressing for a charity bazaar, who dared not contemplate what means of self - expression would be left to her and how she would impose her ostentation on her friends, if charity were not the all - excusing virtue ---- said the social worker who had found no aim in life and could generate no aim from within the sterility of his soul, but basked in virtue and held an unearned respect from all, by grace of his fingers on the wounds of others ---- said the novelist who had nothing to say if the subject of service and sacrifice were to be taken away from him, who sobbed in the hearing of attentive thousands that he loved them and loved them and would they please love him a little in return ---- said the lady columnist who had just bought a country mansion because she wrote so tenderly about the little people ---- said all the little people who wanted to hear of love, the great love, the unfastidious love, the love that embraced everything, forgave everything, and permitted everything ---- said every second - hander who could not exist except as a leech on the souls of others.»

But in our haste to use links as a means to an end, we can lose sight of the fact that the act of building links in many cases can carry benefits that have absolutely nothing to do with the Google - naut or any other search monster.

At the same time, they also appreciate that prosecuting the guilty should not mean hurting others who have done nothing wrong.

I agree God does talk, he has ways to talk and alert you from time to time when you falling away from path to reach him and be one with him, The way i understand is to hear him you should be at level where you think nothing else other then almighty, you should be free from attachment and you do not share your divine intuitions as they are meant to for you and you alone.

It's not the other way around where you demand absolute knowledge and will stop at nothing from claiming you comprehend (even if that means you introduce an even great complexity).

Maybe if you «quoted» others a little less and yourself paid a little more attention, you would have noticed, all by yourself, that nothing that happens has any inherent meaning, other than the one we give it.

The Congress is part and parcel of every one of these acts as they do nothing up there except pull each other's port every day and ours eventually... is that what pork - barrel legislating means.

I understand the urge to refute the Bible, but this discovery says nothing other than the fact that we haven't found bones older than the 10th century B.C. Does that mean there are none?

But still Brother to Brother or Faith to Faith or Path to Path or Branch to branch are being stingy to each other and Greed drive them against each other, the living being means nothing to them as being just a Mankind a Human Being a creation among creations...!?

and there is nothing wrong with the name jihad since jihad actually means «fighting for your country and people» without waiting for anything in return, for the love of god there are NO 72 virgins!!!!!! freedom of speech does not mean insulting other people!

Biblical criticism means nothing but applying to the biblical documents the rational or scientific methods of scholarship which are applied in other fields of study.

Just because YOUR disbelief was not honest, doesn't mean that the disbelief of others is also dishonest, and it is arrogant of you to assume so and project your dishonesty on to other people of whom you know nothing about at all other than what they say in a few messages on an Internet blog.

To follow Abraham, or Moses, or Isaiah, or Jesus, or Socrates, or Buddha, or Confucius, or Mohammed, or Plato, or Aristotle, or Rene Descartes, or Adam Smith, or Hume, or Kant, or Hegel, or Karl Marx, or Leon Trotsky, or Charles Darwin, or Abraham Lincoln, or Friedrich Nietzsche, or Sigmund Freud, or Karl Jung, or John Muir, or Martin Heidegger, or Michel Foucault, or Mahatma Gandhi, or Chairman Mao, or anyone else, does not mean that one learns nothing from the others.

Put the other way round, «existing means nothing more than comprehending the signs», i.e. Jesus» action.

Keen seems to find little if any meaning in «man - as - maker» or «man - for - others» (to say nothing of woman).

This has nothing to do with sin — except perhaps the sin committed by those who run roughshod over others in their zeal to force conformity to their own idea of acceptability — whatever that may mean.

My response is that, you are right, they mean nothing to anyone other than people, but WE ARE PEOPLE, so they are of vital importance to us.

You said (paraphrasing), that in the atheists mindset, morals mean nothing to anything in the universe other than people.

Without the use of personal, agential metaphors, however, including among others God as mother, father, healer, lover, friend, judge, and liberator, the metaphor of the world as God's body would be pantheistic, for the body would be all there were.25 Nonetheless, the model is most precisely designated as panentheistic; that is, it is a view of the God - world relationship in which all things have their origins in God and nothing exists outside God, though this does not mean that God is reduced to these things.26

This does not mean that such discussions have accomplished nothing, but it does mean that no exact and reliable estimate of what they have accomplished (though it is, I believe, a great deal) is possible until we have granted full «belligerent rights» to second - type theism, as a no less qualified contender than either of the others.

We already found that Jesus being there for others means that the transcendent is met in the concern for others as given to us in the life and way of Jesus and our faith is nothing but «participation in this being of Jesus».

Nearly half a century on, in his wittily entitled Omnipotence and Other Theological Mistakes (1984), Hartshorne reviewed two meanings of «all - powerful»: the traditional, of course — the (benevolent) tyrant ideal of absolute, all determining, irresistible power18 — and what he previously had identified as the greatest possible power in a universe of multiple centers of power: «The only livable doctrine of divine power is that it influences all that happens but determines nothing in its concrete particularity.»

Yea, bad things happen in some Churches, but to run screaming, I ain't goin to Church no more cause «I am so tired of platitudes and statements by christians that mean absolutely nothing...,» and all the other excuses, well, you pat them on the head, and say, «Oh you poor thing, I feel your pain.

There is nothing indicating that is true, other than an often wrong source called the bible (which means book)

When Christians say that «Jesus Christ is Lord,» meaning that since nothing else can command our total allegiance, the state and the government are not Lord, they are saying what Jews declare when they give assent to the first commandment: «You shall have no other gods before me.»

This could be read to mean that every element in a theological position should be nothing other than an explication of ideas implicit in everyone's experience.

But if we understand God's «glory» as precisely the divine Love - in - act, with its rejoicing in the joys and its sorrowing with the sadness of God's human children — indeed the glory which is nothing other than the divine generosity, gracious welcome, and unfailing faithfulness in mercy and forgiveness, then the phrase is rich in meaning.

This dual understanding means nothing more than «a duality of aspects» provided one understands by God something really other than oneself, the author of one's created uniqueness that can not be derived from within the world.

Craig both seventh day and anglican are believers they are saved by faith in the death of Jesus Christ and they believe in the forgiveness of sins sactification and the resurection at Christs return.This is what i meant regarding theology one has to be careful otherwise you exclude groups of christians because some of there other theology may not be the same as ours.They still hold to the central truths of the bible but have differences ie like sabbaths or baptism but that does not mean they arent saved or are christians.What church denomination do you belong to if you mentioned jehovah witness or mormons that is a different story as they do nt believe that Jesus Christ is central to there faith they have relegated him to nothing more than a prophet so there is no salvation in those religions.brentnz

This assertion is not meant to imply that religion is either false or ultimately nothing more than the fabrication of human minds — indeed, Berger argues in other writings that the transcendent seems to break through humanly constructed worlds, as it were, from the outside, However, the social scientist must recognize the degree to which religion, like all symbol systems, involves human activity.