Sentences with phrase «means of proof»
Employers may need to establish alternative means of proof, including questionnaires, telephone interviews, and the like to validate absence from the workplace.
http://www.canadianlawyermag.com/
Each means of proof is hyperlinked to a document providing legal authority.
If a prosecutor needs to know the means of proof required to successfully prosecute rape as a crime against humanity, or the recruitment of child solders as a war crime, they can, at the click of a button, view concise analysis of these requirements, as well as the exact paragraphs of previous international and national judgments.
Not exact matches
It is conveniently 20 percent ethanol, meaning it is a 40 - proof hard liquor and saving you the trouble of hitting the liquor store.
«So when Trump says he wants to «open up» libel law, he really means (if he has the slightest knowledge of the law) that he wants to open up — to change — the First Amendment, which, beginning in 1964, has been held to require in cases brought by public figures, proof that what was said was false, and that the newspaper knew or suspected that it was false.
According to David Yonkof, vice president of sales and marketing at global trade management software provider Precision Software, «future proofing» means seeking solutions that can be adapted to support innovation even as regulatory requirements change.
Instead, he works out of a bullet - proof van, and defends the people no other lawyers want to represent: satanic - cult drug addicts, child molesters, you name it — all because he believes everyone deserves a fair trial, even if that means cheating the system to ensure his clients get one.
In fact, given that these letters are being sent to tens of thousands of businesses, and they are all form letters, means that there is very little «proof» of wrongdoing anyway.
The research also discovered that «social proof,» meaning photos of customers, testimonials and social media posts, are great for businesses to have on their websites and help build trust with consumers, ultimately leading to more sales.
In criminal trials, the burden of proof lies on the prosecution, meaning the jury will have to find Hernandez guilty «beyond a reasonable doubt.»
«This means they lose some, but it's a drop in the bucket in their process to create things that will have a real influence,» said Jon Elvekrog, CEO and co-founder of San - Francisco - based social advertising firm 140 Proof.
«This court's failure to hold the government to its congressionally specified burden of proof means Mr. Games - Perez might very well be wrongfully imprisoned.»
UPDATE: Just because I believe in the power of social proof does not mean that I advocate being a lemming when one makes an investment.
As more blocks are added to the chain, more computers — meaning more energy and more space — are required to complete the proof - of - work problem.
Bitmex Research has released their latest report, meant to serve as a guide for understanding proof of stake (PoS) consensus systems and to review the latest ethereum proposal.
Bitcoin is a mined digital asset, meaning that new coins are constantly created by huge datacenters processing complex math problems, or «proof of work.»
All of that, and there is no verifiable proof that any of it is or was ever true can lead a rational person to only one conclusion: a man - made fairy tale at best and a means of mind - control, torture and prejudice at worst.
They come from writings of similar stories that as you admit, have no claimed authors, but where the authors are mostly in question — meaning we have little to no proof who the actual authors were.
you really need to do your research on your boy jesus... that story is very old... and like all relgions, manifested... as for the existence of a god... you provide any evidence (and i mean any) then we can have a discussion... until then, your opinion is invalid... WHAT CAN BE ASSERTED WITHOUT PROOF CAN BE DISMISSED WITHOUT PROOF... HITCHENS
If you want to get subjective and start making claims about «what the bible actaully means», then the burden of proof rests with you.
and there has yet to be definitive proof of ape evolving into human if you have it please by all means post it the world would like to see it, oh and you forgot to put in how evolution has as many gaps as any religion like Genesis Park describes a number of images drawn by Neanderthals and by humans in the Middle East which resemble dinosaurs.
Reality... his bones would have been produced and marveled at as proof that he did not resurrect the Jewish leaders at that time for sure would have produced them... providing of course that they were available... why do nt you take the time to study, read the evidence for yourself before spouting like so many other bitter atheists (that I once was for many years)... give love a try you might enjoy it, it gives live meaning and true purpose, everything finds its place in Christ... I hope you find hope some day...
you sir are practicing a religion one that means so much to you that you use it as your online name also please show me where I call you a fool or is telling someone not to make a fool of themself the same as calling them a fool which would mean you are very religious as far as Colin he said nothing that related to the debate I was in with you... we are talking about Atheism as a religious view not debating the existence of God now look over the definitions I have shown you and please explain how Atheism does not fit into the said definitions And you claim that evolution is true so the burden of proof falls in your lap as it is the base of your religion.
Because many of you claimed you're atheists yet you know what God means to you also know bibles since many of you DID read it and know God and Jesus therefore you're not atheist but truly are agnostic because you all WANT proof that if God is existed or not..
Even though he knew the truth and saw with his own eyes the proof that Jesus was the Messiah, he cared so little that he'd let Jesus be killed if it meant he could profit off of it.
I have heard many different theologians debate whether the behemoth was a crocodile or a hippo and some say it refered to a dino of some kind, none had any more proof than conjecturing about what the ancient hebrew words to describe it really meant.
By saying God avenges his Prophet means he was / is beloved of God, he will not tolarate and our Islamic history is Proof.
I suspect that there was a lot of forgiveness in those days (I have no proof, but the idea of knocking out your neighbor's tooth on purpose when he accidentally knocked out yours has to have been a less than tasteful means of resolution).
It has multiple meanings 1) complete trust or confidence 2) strong belief in a religion based on spiritual apprehension rather than proof 3) a system of religious belief
The proof of the Arab leaders» true attitudes is in their behavior, and their behavior to date gives us no reason to believe that they do not mean what they say when they routinely insist that the existence of «the Zionist entity» is an intolerable affront to Arab honor.
«matt — just because we can use science and reason to explain natural events doesn't mean there isn't a god, case in point, rainbows, a sign given by god to Noah can be explained by science but is still a promise made by god» But thats not proof of anything.
Science clearly disproves some aspects of the bible, and some takes on evolution but the bible never claimed to be a «scientific proof for the existence of God» it was meant as a blueprint for how to live so that you may experience God directly.
Ben... if you have evidential proof of the existence of your god, by all means, present it.
Faith does mean the willingness to believe in the absence of proof.
That is, you're using the whole of Scripture and you have passages that are «proofs,» but you also have passages that are more about what it means to be made in the image of God and, also, a woman.
The spiritual lesson is the better proof that God does things in the number seven which means completeness and perfection of His plans
It may not be scientific proof of anything, but it is proof of something of meaning, of psychologicaly use, to that individual.
My stance on a supernatural deity is that I have no proof of the existence of one, but that doesn't mean one could not exist.
The standard of «no proof» means you also must accept, if you are consistent, that there is a 1957 Chevy orbiting Pluto.
Today nothing can be achieved any longer by means of the traditional location of the concept of God in the gaps of natural science, by means of the assertion that the concept of God is necessary to explain the world, by means of any transformation of the world by theistic proofs.
What is the basis for demanding proof of something such as faith when one does not know what is even written or that it is meant to work the other way around?
As I am aware that many are promoting a popular view that has been rationalized by whatever means, however you have failed to provide a shred of the emperical proof you claim, and as far as personal experiences, my point exactly has been that they exist in the realm of feeling and emotion, which any rational person would willingly admit is often self - deceptive.....
Just what we needed, a proof texter finding verses to support his view and throwing them at us as if it means end of discussion.
It is troubling and disconcerting to look up the verses cited by orthodox theologians (but not just them) only to discover that the proof melts away under closer scrutiny of the meaning and context.
There is no tested evidence of these natural explanations, much less proof, but the existence of multiple natural possibilities negates the Big Bang and Inflation as proof of God (that doesn't mean it proves No God, it means that it can't prove God did it since there are other alternatives).
You could be an agnostic atheist, meaning you don't think that the existence of gods is knowable, but you don't choose to believe in one without further proof.
You are proof texting and changing the meaning of scripture to suit your idea of grace and works.
Kinda like god too, no proof, but the lack of proof means it is real, right?
Striking down the law, of course, changes the burden of proof: Absent a Court decision, Republicans have the perhaps futile task of getting it negated through executive / legislative means.
because you want us to fixate on one definition of supernatural that implies a god, without having any proof to make the connection, when there are other definitions that do not involve a god or magic, that simply mean we don't know.