The great change we seek by
means of this new constitution is to replace one form of democracy with another.
Not exact matches
Yet, even if the preferred outcomes might vary, there has been a general degree
of agreement about the need to employ a process that respects the words
of the
Constitution by not reading
new meanings into them and instead defers to democratic institutions.
Or taking a less precise definition
of beginning, one might consider the whole period, from the Declaration
of Independence to the inauguration
of Washington under the
new Constitution, as the origin time
of the American nation, America began as the result
of a series
of conscious decisions, The acts embodying those decisions have a kind
of absolute
meaning - creating significance.
The Second Great Awakening (1800 - 1830), coming shortly after the
Constitution had launched the republic, defined what it
meant to be «an American,» and what was the manifest destiny
of the
new nation.
Prisoners
of the standard narrative, they mistakenly believe that Vatican II
meant to sever the Church from her past, and to set up, as one theologian has risibly put it, a
new «
constitution» for the Catholic Church.
If by the «primitive church» we
mean the church
of the first century and the first quarter, say,
of the second — and such a period represents the approximate range
of this chapter — we have at most only the
New Testament documents and some
of the Apostolic Fathers; and none
of these documents is concerned to set forth in any full or systematic way the
constitution of the church or the methods
of its work.
The Council had the power to appoint all State, county and municipal officials within the state
of New York for which no other
means of appointment or election was provided for in the State
Constitution.
The shadow chancellor's move has caused concern in Labour ranks because two
of his
new advisers are or have recently been members
of other political parties, with which Labour is not
meant to engage under its
constitution.
I stand to be corrected, but I assume Doe Adjaho was in a dilemma not knowing what the
Constitution meant by saying «where the president and the vice - president are both unable to perform the function
of the president, the speaker
of parliament shall perform those function until the president or vice president is able to perform those function or a
new president assumes office as the case may be» (11).
for all students in the eighth and higher grades, instruction in the history,
meaning, significance and effect
of the provisions
of the
Constitution of the United States and the amendments thereto, the Declaration
of Independence, the
Constitution of the State
of New York and the amendments thereto, as required by section 801
of the Education Law;
New Haven, Conn. — Connecticut's fourth - and eighth - grade students continue to score higher than their national peers in reading, and have made modest long - term gains in math based on 2017 results from the Nation's Report Card — but our current rate
of progress
means The
Constitution State would need a century to close the achievement gap.
The Florida public - school establishment is suing to repeal the Sunshine State's 13 - year - old school - choice tax credit and its
new education savings accounts under the state's Blaine Amendment and its «uniformity clause,» which mandates that «Adequate provision shall be made by law for a uniform, efficient, safe, secure, and high quality system
of free public schools...» The Florida Supreme Court previously struck down the state's voucher program under this provision in Bush v. Holmes (2006), on the grounds that the vouchers «divert [ed] public dollars» from «the sole
means set out in the
Constitution for the state to provide for the education
of Florida's children.»
The far - reaching consequences, combined with the fact that Holmes contradicts the plain
meaning of the state
constitution, may be enough to persuade the
new bench to overturn or at least narrowly limit the Holmes precedent.
Interestingly, it's not clear what the appellate order
means since the court
of appeals agreed with the prosecution that «Mr. Stern's
new trial motion could not be granted... [b] ut... what can occur to Mr. Stern once the remittur issues is limited by the double jeopardy provisions
of our
Constitutions.»
Both the Georgia and
New York decisions relied entirely on analysis
of the state
constitution, which
means that there's no basis for further review at the U.S. Supreme Court.
Some states had direct appeals
of criminal convictions earlier than this but the writ
of habeas corpus does precede a direct appeal as a form
of relief from a wrongful criminal conviction historically and was the primary
means by which one could obtain relief from a criminal conviction in 1789 when the U.S.
Constitution, which preserved the right to seek a writ of habeas corpus even before the Bill of Rights added most other new criminal procedure rights under the constitution,
Constitution, which preserved the right to seek a writ
of habeas corpus even before the Bill
of Rights added most other
new criminal procedure rights under the
constitution,
constitution, was adopted.