Although its strong economic growth
means overall emissions are still increasing, China has reached its 2020 «carbon intensity» targets ahead of time by implementing serious environmental policies and technological innovation.
Not exact matches
«If we use the storage as the
means to foster the adoption of significantly more renewables that offset the dirtiest sources, then storage — done the right way and installed at large - scale — can have beneficial impacts on the grid's
emissions overall,» Webber said.
«If you went back to 1850 and repeated history» —
meaning the same volcanic eruptions, the same solar variability, the same greenhouse gas
emissions — «the
overall temperature increase would be about the same, but you would end up with somewhat different temperature records due to the inherent randomness in the climate.»
Even the 350 - ppm limit for carbon dioxide is «questionable,» says physicist Myles Allen of the Climate Dynamics Group at the University of Oxford, and focusing instead on keeping cumulative
emissions below one trillion metric tons might make more sense, which would
mean humanity has already used up more than half of its
overall emissions budget.
That
means per - capita transportation
emissions have gone down, even as
overall emissions remain about the same.
Besides outstanding thermal efficiency, diesels» low
overall emissions «profile»
means less reliance on expensive, deterioration - prone exhaust aftertreatment strategies.
In other words: Increased fertilizer use alone would likely
mean that either of those projects would increase greenhouse gas
emissions overall and thus make climate change even worse.
Second, a reference emergency pathway should not be so vague when it comes to defining
overall global
emissions allowances, or indeed in specifying what «substantial deviation from baseline» in the «non-Annex I» developing world actually
means.
One way or another the oil will find a way to market, which
means building Keystone won't raise
overall greenhouse gas
emissions at all relative to not building it.
The compromise would involve «
emission trading» among nations that faced different costs of compliance, as a
means of lowering the
overall cost.
Defines «reporting entity» to
mean: (1) a covered entity; (2) an entity that would be covered if it had emitted, produced, imported, manufactured, or delivered in 2008 or any subsequent year more than the applicable threshold level of carbon dioxide; (3) other entities that EPA determines will help achieve
overall goals of reducing global warming pollution; (4) any vehicle fleet with
emissions of more than 25,000 tons of carbon dioxide equivalent on an annual basis, if its inclusion will help achieve such reduction; (5) any entity that delivers electricity to a facility in an energy - intensive industrial sector that meets the energy or GHG intensity criteria.
The French had a point: the
emission trading scheme, while it would have allowed the U.S. to sign on, was really a cop - out, since buying unused permits from Russia would
mean that
overall emissions to the atmosphere would not actually be reduced at all.
The recent recession has also left
emissions permits undersold,
meaning there's room, under the EU limit, to burn more coal or gas
overall.
Because
emissions needed for food production will decline more slowly, a 3 %
overall decline
means a 4 % p.a. decline in energy and industrial
emissions.
By Otto's logic, that
means countries should already have cut their
overall carbon
emissions by 10 percent in that time, an ambition that outstrips the Clean Power Plan's goal of six percent in 15 years.
For example, the 183 figure which is highlighted in gold
means Mass's 17.1 % electric power as a source of its
overall CO2
emissions is 1.83 times higher than Maine's 9.4 % electric power as a source of CO2.
Now, new research in Nature Climate Change [1] not only reinforces the reality of this trend — which is already provoking debate about the
overall climate consequences of a warming Arctic — but statistically attributes it to human causes, which largely
means greenhouse gas
emissions (albeit with a mix of other elements as well)
This
means that oil sands oil has
overall (well to wheels)
emissions some 17 % greater than for typical crude oil and most of these extra
emissions are due to energy needed to extract bitumen from the ground.
Neither will the 85 % electric - sector CO2 reduction afforded just by nuclear + gas suffice: 85 % is what we should be shooting for
overall,
meaning electric - sector
emissions must become essentially zero.
A high enough carbon price would incentivise more efficiency and level the playing field for other, less polluting
means of transport, such as railways, thus reducing
overall emissions.