Sentences with phrase «means smoking guns»

While the patent application is by no means a smoking gun, it suggests Apple is thinking seriously about smart home initiatives and how to create hubs around the home.

Not exact matches

That means the Toons walk around in California just like any other citizens, smoking cigars, firing guns, and smashing plates.

There's bullets, a smoking gun, stuff shattering and a mean - looking Solid Snake in his magically transforming camouflage.

But Maclean and his cast create a sound, tone and feel that makes even a moldy tale like this lean, mean and fresh, even if it never quite transcends the gun smoke of its genre.

Those are legal terms of art... and under Delaware law, they essentially mean «you've got to get caught holding the smoking gun, profit from a clear conflict of interest, or have the IQ of a rattle to be found reckless, let along knowing.»

But sometimes consensus just means that there is a consensus of skeptics (e.g., Wegener's theory of continental drift was proposed in 1912 based on continent shapes but was not widely accepted until 50 years later because the smoking gun — deep sea rifts — hadn't been discovered) or there is consensus because the data is overwhelming (e.g., descent with modification).

On the naïve and scientifically silly assumption that the only way that plant - based carbon can get into the atmosphere is by people burning fuels, they exult that here indeed is the smoking gun: Decreases of C13 in the atmosphere mean that our sinful combustions are clearly identifiable as major contributors to the 100 ppm increase in CO2 since 1850.

I will put all of this in full context as more analysis of the revelations and their meaning emerge, but just know this was described to me as «the closest thing you're ever going to come to a «smoking gun.»»

Thereafter, in my third article, Official: Satellite Failure Means Decade of Global Warming Data Doubtful we saw the smoking gun evidence of a cover up after examining the offending satellite's AVHRR Subsystem Summary.

General disclosure rules mean that the UK has so far been spared some of the worst problems suffered by litigators in the US (not least the tactic of swamping the other side with terabytes of data in the hope of concealing the «smoking gun»).

By the way, will «proportionality» be a valid defence to the e & o claim againt me when my failure turn over that last rock, because of «proportionality» means I didn't get to the «Pinto smoking gun» memo?