Sentences with phrase «means taking you to court»

Erm, we mean take to the courts in NBA 2K18, which dunks onto the shop this week, with beach racing, definitive legends, quests and half - circles along with much more.
This usually means taking you to court in order to force you to pay.
And take action means taking you to court, having a payment hearing and then getting the right to seize your assets or your income.

Not exact matches

In a traditional civil rehabilitation, once the court gives the green light, it typically takes six months for the plan to be finalized — meaning optimistically, creditors could begin to get paid, preferably in Bitcoins, as soon as late this year.
Serena Williams may be taking a break from the court to focus on family, but by no means is she slowing down when it comes to expanding her brand beyond the realm of tennis.
«Signing up for a credit card or opening a bank account can often mean signing away your right to take the company to court if things go wrong,» said CFPB Director Richard Cordray in a statement, adding «many banks and financial companies avoid accountability.»
The Supreme Court's ruling over raisins means regulators need to think twice about taking private property.
You might even be sued by a debt collector and face a court order to garnish part of your wages — this means that money will be taken directly from your paycheck in order to satisfy your debt.
Most foreclosures in Colorado are non-judicial, which means the lender doesn't have to take you to court to foreclose on the home.
Legal expense insurance gains in popularity Reinsurance takes hard look at quake threats New pressures on Errors & Omissions could mean you wind up in court KPMG chats with Top Broker about its world view How identity theft victims» information is misused RSA helps entrepreneurs get social How to wow clients with a great meal and a touch of class
The words «to it,» the imprecise meaning of the words «directly,» «related» and «relevant,» the privative clause in section 23 of the Act, and the highly factual and policy nature of relevancy determinations, taken together, widen the margin of appreciation that this Court should afford the Board in its relevancy determination...
The Law society, in other words, has given «guidance» to its members as to how to draft wills in a way which circumvents English legal principles as they have always been accepted: and it envisages that this might even mean taking on the English law in court to see if their wily little legal tricks have been successful: a perfect example of an attempt to make the letter of the law prevail over its spirit: Christians will remember that, according to St Paul (2 Corinthians 3:6), «the letter killeth but the spirit giveth life».
It took the Supreme Court a mere twenty - five years to make this premise explicit, in the famous «Mystery Passage» of the 1992 Casey decision: «At the heart of liberty is the right to define one's own concept of existence, of meaning, of the universe, and of the mystery of human life.»
The Court of Appeals for this Circuit in the Gaidry case took note of these two cases, but held them not reconcilable with the later ruling of the United States Supreme Court in Baglin v. Cusenier, 221 U. S. 680 [1 T. M. Rep. 147], wherein it was held that the fact that the primary meaning of the word «Chartreuse» was geographical did not prevent the acquisition of the exclusive right to its use as the designation of a liqueur made by the monks of the Monastery of La Grande Chartreuse.
The luxury of an Undefeated Season means that Team Robinson can sit back and relax this coming Sunday and wait while 4 Teams get knocked out of the Playoffs before they even need to take the court again..
This means that Townsend had to take to the court by herself and play 2 - on - 1 doubles tennis.
So when they took the court on Wednesday Night, they knew «Win or Go Home» meant even more to them..
Then halfway through his testimony he admitted to committing fraud on the stand and was taken back into government custody - meaning he went to jail each day after court.
Finally, if 1/20/09 comes and goes with a usurper in the Whitehouse (that is, Obama is definitely NOT an Article II «natural born citizen» — dad Kenyan / British citizen at BHO's birth — albeit he MAY be a 14th Amendment «citizen») with usurper enablers in Congress and the Supreme Court... God help us because many of the people will — rightfully and under our Constitution and Declaration of Independence — endeavor through other means to take back the Government from what is nothing less than a non-constitutional coup d'etat.
By this they mean to remove section 2 of the HRA which requires the UK courts to take account of the ECtHR jurisprudence.
The decision means barristers will not take on any new legal aid work once it comes into force, but it is the no - returns policy which could really bring the crown courts to their knees.
«I mean the numbers don't look good in taking the Senate back right now and the Republicans are going to keep the House, and in a Trump presidency, with the Senate confirming a conservative Supreme Court nominee, all of the progressive things that we care about in New York City could be taken away,» he said.
«If you don't believe this election is important, if you think you can sit it out, take a moment to think about the Supreme Court justices that Donald Trump would nominate and what that would mean to civil liberties, equal rights and the future of our country,» Sanders said.
«The court observes first of all that the data to be retained make it possible, in particular, (1) to know the identity of the person with whom a subscriber or registered user has communicated and by what means, (2) to identify the time of the communication as well as the place from which that communication took place and (3) to know the frequency of the communications of the subscriber or registered user with certain persons during a given period.
It's also meant to ensure it doesn't «give the appearance of compromising judicial impartiality and independence (including independence from the political process)» while keeping a judge from taking a position on issues that might ultimately wind up before the courts, he argues in the memo.
The indicment filed in state court today says that after Hunlety learned she was the target of an investigation, she wrote a «template» for a fake, backdated letter that was meant to fool investigations into believing that events by the organization had taken place.
We are confident that judges will take advantage of the AAAS offer to provide a slate of candidates to serve as court - appointed experts in cases in which the court has determined that the traditional means of clarifying issues under the adversarial system are unlikely to yield the information that is necessary for a reasoned and principled resolution of the disputed issues.
Another thing that was a bit off - putting (and I mean this in a strictly historical and filmcraft way), the film seemed to go out of its way to stamp our current morals, mores and politically - correct culture to events supposedly taking place in 18th - Century France (with minorities holding high positions in the Parisian Court and even an openly gay character introduced).
District court judges took this to mean that desegregation orders must be revised on a regular basis to ensure racial balance.
The outcome of this campaign could mean more councils around the world feel confident in making financial decisions that attack the existence of libraries, or could mean that councils don't want to take the risk on libraries fighting back in court and winning.
That means you have a tax offset — basically you owe a government entity or court some amount of money, and the IRS is going to potentially take your refund to pay it.
However, Congress never defined what undue hardship meant, and so the courts have taken it upon themselves to decide - and it's not always uniform.
This means that if to some extent your debt problem has become a legal problem, a debt settlement company (usually a law firm or a company with expert lawyers) will be able to reach an agreement with the creditors and take your debt problem out of courts.
The majority of consumer debt — things like homes, cars, medical bills, etc. — can be discharged in bankruptcy, meaning the court wipes out the debt and the lenders can't take any legal action to collect.
This means that for many people, the optimal strategy is not to pay on defaulted unsecured debts, and challenge them if they take you to court.
This means that the Student Loans Company (SLC) are still allowed to take money from your wages for a loan over five years old as they do not have to go to court to do so.
It just means you can not be sued or taken to court after the statute of limitations has expired.
Even if a DCA threatens to take court action against you, it doesn't always mean that they will do this.
That means if you dispute the error online, you won't be able to take the credit bureau to court if they repeatedly verify errors as accurate on your credit reports.
All that means is if the creditor was to take you to court and sue you, your defence, if you made one, would be that the debt is past the limitations period.
«Taking legal action» means that a creditor sues you in court to obtain a judgment against you.
im from argentina but im living in canada as a citizen but i have problems with my credit card for about a year now a Collection Agency is taking me to court but i have no job in canada my only income is from my office in argentina but is not enough money to pay them i have a saving account with $ 25,000 in there so it mean they gonna freezze my account and i will never withdraw my money until i pay?
Which means they can't do diddly - squat if they take you to court and you insist that you don't belive you owe what they are claiming and you demand to see the signed agreement and signed charge statements.
-- Even if your card debt has legally expired, that doesn't mean creditors can't take you to court seeking payment.
This week the state supreme court refused to take up the issue, which means the Midwest City ban is now officially dead.
Unfortunately, without intervention — both through law enforcement and court - mandated counseling — the hoarder typically will continue to take in more animals even when it is clearly beyond his or her means to care for them.
-- Even if your card debt has legally expired, that doesn't mean creditors can't take you to court seeking payment.
As you may expect this means they expect the US courts to take action.
Whereas Greenpeace et al have legal teams to take development or planning issues to the High Court, it was beyond the means of most campaigners to apply for judicial review, and would do at huge personal cost and financial risk.
It may be inferred that the District Court has taken the first clause of the above statement to mean that EU citizenship will eventually become the primary political and legal source of rights and duties for individuals even outside the scope of EU law.
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z