Sentences with phrase «means they scores better»

Not exact matches

Improving your credit score can mean qualifying for lower interest rates and better terms.

Samsung, Nokia and especially Apple have typically scored well in such surveys, meaning that people who buy devices from those makers are generally quite pleased with them.

That means being realistic about how long you plan to stay in your home, getting your credit score in order, finding the best refinance rates and saving money where you can, such as on inspection fees and closing costs.

A higher credit score can also mean you get better interest rates.

This means checking your Dun & Bradstreet Paydex Score, Experian Intelliscore Plus and Equifax Business Credit Report as well as your personal FICO sScore, Experian Intelliscore Plus and Equifax Business Credit Report as well as your personal FICO scorescore.

Private student loan lenders make refinancing available to well - qualified borrowers, which means there is a review of income, credit history and score, and other factors that show the borrower is a low risk to the lender.

In today's quality scoring environment, less impressions for unqualified searches means better performance and potentially higher positions and lower click cost prices.

This means that customers with best credit score may enjoy the lowest apr while other people may fall into the highest apr of 21 %.

Borrowers with fair to average credit — which means they have credit scores between 630 and 680 — will face more difficulty in getting personal loans than borrowers with good credit.

It's also normal for these lenders to provide risk - based loans, meaning a better credit score will get lower rates.

A loan grade of A1, for example, has the lowest risks and the best interest rates, whereas a G5 loan means you have a lower credit score and bring more risk to the table.

To secure a release, the borrower will likely need to prove they can continue making on - time payments by themselves, which means having a steady income and a good credit score.

A score of 80 or higher puts your business into the best risk group, meaning that your history of payments has demonstrated a low risk of late payment.

I guess that just means you think you're special enough to your god that prayer would get you to have good test scores, but god will continue to let children around the world starve, get kidnapped, raped, and all sorts of horrific things, but it's a priority that you get good grades.

There's no talk in the book of Wade using the fortune to make the world better or «save humanity» — it's a means for him to be super powerful, super rich, and score the girl he met online.

Tiggy... just because you didn't have a good father figure, doesn't mean there aren't scores of men who are wonder fathers and who are totally commited to their children.

So to claim «atheists and agnostics» score better (yadda yadda) has no meaning.

Conventional terms have little if any meaning to scores of our contemporaries; hence they are better avoided.

On a practical level, it means coffee buyers (importers, roasters, and consumers) will have some objective benchmark (the Q coffee score) indicating the quality of the coffee, as well as the flavor profile.

I was saying that just because Strome is scoring a bunch of goals in juniors doesn't mean he can skate well enough to play in the NHL.

the problem isn't cos he isn't WC, the problem is cos he is a rich man's Andy Carroll; I mean even Defoe that play for relegation candidate - Sunderland is a far better striker than him.he isn't WorldClass either Chicharito is also way better, he isn't a 30 - goal striker but when u play almost all games for a club with the creativity as Arsenal, scoring 30goals isn't a big deal.

Yet this was by no means as cut - and - dried a victory as it may have sounded when you listened to Palmer sitting in the clubhouse with his winning 276 — the second best score ever shot at the Masters — and chatting about breaking records.

I mean, you could ask for more scoring than Read provides from a 4th liner, but the Flyers don't have anybody better.

It's meant that Arsenal haven't had the best of luck with scoring penalties this season and so the question was raised about why our first choice penalty taker, isn't actually taking all the pens.

People keep using stats to defend him because that's the only way to defend him.When you watch him most at times you he hardly wows you or is any special.Can i ask a question couldn't Chamakh or Bendtner or Aliadiere score about 15 - 18 goals with this super super creative arsenal midfield.I mean lets be honest if Chamakh in his first season should have scored 20 goals in EPL many people would still want him out you know why because watching every aspect of his game and also analyzing every aspect of his game he was below average in his time at arsenal to be honest.So its not only about stats because stats do nt tell me the whole story about a player though they are facts and don't lie the eyes do nt lie.And with this same eyes we look at players and say Aguero is better thab Bony, Costa is better than Remy, and so on.

I think we need Mahrez or Draxler or another top winger to do well in CL especially if we offload Campbell Walcott, Ramsey and Ox were not that great last season Mahrez is high scoring winger and he could mean the difference between PL winning and CL winning

Salah was also keen to play down his own success by talking up the qualities of strike partner Roberto Firmino and the way he helps the team up front, as well as Jurgen Klopp's general tactics meaning he's always given plenty of opportunities to score, making his job easier in that department.

Theo has 34 shots in the league this year, meaning he scores on average one in every 11 shots, this is not good enough.

I still don't see how he is a super sub.He's labelled as a super sub just because of this season.Those matches when he scored he was supposed to be played because we needed an aerial presence.A lot of those matches had he started we could've won because we needed aerial presence.But the thing is that his abilities don't suit him as a super sub.I mean he holds up the ball well and is great in the air and that's just about it.He's actually the one one who needs service and who needs players around him to open up defences for him to receive the pass and not vice versa.Super subs actually provide they are not the one's to be provided for.In Giroud's case he was supposed to start in those in matches as Sanchez was not up to the task in aerial battles.Giroud will not be able to affect a match if the opponents are as good in the air.

Play all three together and it means we better score some goals.

Arsenal were the better team for most of this away tie but it just would not quite click up front, while yet another in a season full of dodgy penalty decisions going against us meant that the Germans were able to score the opener and then hold on valiantly for what is a huge result for the team rock bottom of the Bundesliga.

This means we potentially have some very good creativity, but it also means, we will need all other players to be part of the defensive organization, if we are to keep Chelsea from scoring at least 2 - 3 goals.

Its NOT just Giroud its the whole strike force that are absolutly rubbish, I mean yes Giroud misses far more than he scores and that is NOT the mark of top notch striker, but Wellbeck is not the finished article and to my mind shows no signs of becoming so, He seems to suffer from this innate lack of courage, a lot like Wallcott does, in laymans terms they sh!t out when it comes to the crunch, Giroud is just not good enough to be the striker we really need on the end of Ozil's assists.

Besiktas is a real threat to us specially this early in the season with many players not quite fit, it is important that we don't let Besiktas score even if it means 0 - 0 score line in Turkey, i am sure once we get them in Emirates we will do well.

For Arsenal, I hope one of the strikers will be influential which means we score lots of goals and we're going to have a good chance to go very far in the competition.

If you've been the Emirates youll know only too well the games I mean, Arsenal would have several hundred attempts on goal but just couldn't score, and even though in times past the calmness and composure of Arsene would filter down to the players and the goal would come (no matter how late) times had changed and now the players knew that if they missed that chance or misplaced that pass the fans would groan or moan, and this led to the tension that has haunted the Emirates ever since.

I mean who wouldn't be insulted if you scored 20 goals in a top European league and you tell me the best I can do is a mid-table team or relegation candidates.

Casemiro, Modric and Kroos have been outstanding as well as Isco meaning James hasn't had too much game time, even so he has scored 8 and assisted 6 in only 13 La Liga starts.

Arsene Wenger can must get Ben Yedder as long as he's clinical and can beat his man.I'd take him over Giroud any day and I think if Giroud is put in that Toulouse squad he won't score more goals than Ben Yedder and denying this fact would mean you choose to be blinded.We had better get him quickly.I've said it here time and time again the reason why Arsenal are not winning things with Giroud is because he's not clinical.If you guys were to ever watch his misses in every season by season since he came here you would be shocked at the kind of striker we have.But as usual he's always forgiven and people continually rate him basing it on statistics and forget he's playing for Arsenal with the likes of.......

if every1 can rally round giroud to I will always give his best, it doesn't mean he has to score 30 goals every season.

I for one would go and get him straight away as Ben Yedder is an all round striker a bag of tricks he plays in a lower team and scored a bag full of goals which means he fought hard against better defenders to get his goals Ben Yedder can come at you from any direction with either foot and score and he is good at set pieces two I would be ecstatically delighted if we sign him up as we would have our own Mahrez

Yedder is known as a goalscoring talent in France and has scored 70 goals in four seasons, a mean feat for any striker, let alone a player who doesn't get the best of service from his teammates.

He is faster than Arteta and Flamini Stronger... Can dribble the ball better Obviously can defend... Has scored some beauty's in his short time there (I mean scorchers)

That means that a win for the Gunners at Southampton on Friday along with a home win for Stoke City against Man United, could see Arsenal overtake Louis van Gaal and his Red Devils in the table as well, depending on the scores.

You can play the best game in the world but if you don't score it doesn't mean anything.

This is an incredibly difficult question to answer for a variety of reasons, most importantly because over the years our once vaunted «beautiful» style of play has become a shadow of it's former self, only to be replaced by a less than stellar «plug and play» mentality where players play out of position and adjustments / substitutions are rarely forthcoming before the 75th minute... if you look at our current players, very few would make sense in the traditional Wengerian system... at present, we don't have the personnel to move the ball quickly from deep - lying position, efficient one touch midfielders that can make the necessary through balls or the disciplined and pacey forwards to stretch defences into wide positions, without the aid of the backs coming up into the final 3rd, so that we can attack the defensive lanes in the same clinical fashion we did years ago... on this current squad, we have only 1 central defender on staf, Mustafi, who seems to have any prowess in the offensive zone or who can even pass two zones through so that we can advance play quickly out of our own end (I have seen some inklings that suggest Holding might have some offensive qualities but too early to tell)... unfortunately Mustafi has a tendency to get himself in trouble when he gets overly aggressive on the ball... from our backs out wide, we've seen pace from the likes of Bellerin and Gibbs and the spirited albeit offensively stunted play of Monreal, but none of these players possess the skill - set required in the offensive zone for the new Wenger scheme which requires deft touches, timely runs to the baseline and consistent crossing, especially when Giroud was playing and his ratio of scored goals per clear chances was relatively low (better last year though)... obviously I like Bellerin's future prospects, as you can't teach pace, but I do worry that he regressed last season, which was obvious to Wenger because there was no way he would have used Ox as the right side wing - back so often knowing that Barcelona could come calling in the off - season, if he thought otherwise... as for our midfielders, not a single one, minus the more confident Xhaka I watched played for the Swiss national team a couple years ago, who truly makes sense under the traditional Wenger model... Ramsey holds onto the ball too long, gives the ball away cheaply far too often and abandons his defensive responsibilities on a regular basis (doesn't score enough recently to justify): that being said, I've always thought he does possess a little something special, unfortunately he thinks so too... Xhaka is a little too slow to ever boss the midfield and he tends to telegraph his one true strength, his long ball play: although I must admit he did get a bit better during some points in the latter part of last season... it always made me wonder why whenever he played with Coq Wenger always seemed to play Francis in a more advanced role on the pitch... as for Coq, he is way too reckless at the wrong times and has exhibited little offensive prowess yet finds himself in and around the box far too often... let's face it Wenger was ready to throw him in the trash heap when injuries forced him to use Francis and then he had the nerve to act like this was all part of a bigger Wenger constructed plan... he like Ramsey, Xhaka and Elneny don't offer the skills necessary to satisfy the quick transitory nature of our old offensive scheme or the stout defensive mindset needed to protect the defensive zone so that our offensive players can remain aggressive in the final third... on the front end, we have Ozil, a player of immense skill but stunted by his physical demeanor that tends to offend, the fact that he's been played out of position far too many times since arriving and that the players in front of him, minus Sanchez, make little to no sense considering what he has to offer (especially Giroud); just think about the quick counter-attack offence in Real or the space and protection he receives in the German National team's midfield, where teams couldn't afford to focus too heavily on one individual... this player was a passing «specialist» long before he arrived in North London, so only an arrogant or ignorant individual would try to reinvent the wheel and / or not surround such a talent with the necessary components... in regards to Ox, Walcott and Welbeck, although they all possess serious talents I see them in large part as headless chickens who are on the injury table too much, lack the necessary first - touch and / or lack the finishing flair to warrant their inclusion in a regular starting eleven; I would say that, of the 3, Ox showed the most upside once we went to a back 3, but even he became a bit too consumed by his pending contract talks before the season ended and that concerned me a bit... if I had to choose one of those 3 players to stay on it would be Ox due to his potential as a plausible alternative to Bellerin in that wing - back position should we continue to use that formation... in Sanchez, we get one of the most committed skill players we've seen on this squad for some years but that could all change soon, if it hasn't already of course... strangely enough, even he doesn't make sense given the constructs of the original Wenger offensive model because he holds onto the ball too long and he will give the ball up a little too often in the offensive zone... a fact that is largely forgotten due to his infectious energy and the fact that the numbers he has achieved seem to justify the means... finally, and in many ways most crucially, Giroud, there is nothing about this team or the offensive system that Wenger has traditionally employed that would even suggest such a player would make sense as a starter... too slow, too inefficient and way too easily dispossessed... once again, I think he has some special skills and, at times, has showed some world - class qualities but he's lack of mobility is an albatross around the necks of our offence... so when you ask who would be our best starting 11, I don't have a clue because of the 5 or 6 players that truly deserve a place in this side, 1 just arrived, 3 aren't under contract beyond 2018 and the other was just sold to Juve... man, this is theraputic because following this team is like an addiction to heroin without the benefits

I mean a club without fans is nothing... we have power, power to show enough is enough & we're fed up of those excuses of we were unlucky & bad refereeing: the truth of the matter is if you play better regardless 9/10: you score more, you defend better & you WIN except for that odd game.

I mean defenders getting forward during open play and not set pieces, who would have ever imagined the likes of Nigel Winterburn and Stuart Pearce «breezing» past players on the wings, overlapping midfielders and producing pint point and precise crossing to the strikers up front or even better yet taking on defenders and scoring... Doesn't sound right to the ear, does it?

Stephen Hunt scored the first goal of the League season after some sloppy defending but Didier Drogba leveled things with a fine free kick but then Boaz Myhill kept the home side at bay with some good saves until Drogba scored a fine second in injury time which may or may not have actually been meant as a cross.

His best result was an eighth place at Monza, which meant that Villeneuve (and the team) scored precisely zero points all year and finished last in the Constructors» Championship, behind even Minardi.