Energy efficiency
means using less energy to provide the same level of energy.
This means they use less energy.
Not exact matches
WorldWise, for instance, makes a point of
using only U.S. manufacturers, which it can visit to ensure that they meet its standards; proximity to customers also
means energy savings and
less pollution.
More recycling generally
means less waste,
less energy used, and
less pollution.
But already we know that we can accomplish our purposes with far
less energy than we now
use and that other
means of fueling cars and heating homes are being developed.
In addition to reducing the truck body's weight to save on fuel, the GuardianLT's high thermal performance also reduces fuel and electricity consumption without skimming on performance, which
means the body helps maintain desired temperatures
using less energy.
This is an incredibly difficult question to answer for a variety of reasons, most importantly because over the years our once vaunted «beautiful» style of play has become a shadow of it's former self, only to be replaced by a
less than stellar «plug and play» mentality where players play out of position and adjustments / substitutions are rarely forthcoming before the 75th minute... if you look at our current players, very few would make sense in the traditional Wengerian system... at present, we don't have the personnel to move the ball quickly from deep - lying position, efficient one touch midfielders that can make the necessary through balls or the disciplined and pacey forwards to stretch defences into wide positions, without the aid of the backs coming up into the final 3rd, so that we can attack the defensive lanes in the same clinical fashion we did years ago... on this current squad, we have only 1 central defender on staf, Mustafi, who seems to have any prowess in the offensive zone or who can even pass two zones through so that we can advance play quickly out of our own end (I have seen some inklings that suggest Holding might have some offensive qualities but too early to tell)... unfortunately Mustafi has a tendency to get himself in trouble when he gets overly aggressive on the ball... from our backs out wide, we've seen pace from the likes of Bellerin and Gibbs and the spirited albeit offensively stunted play of Monreal, but none of these players possess the skill - set required in the offensive zone for the new Wenger scheme which requires deft touches, timely runs to the baseline and consistent crossing, especially when Giroud was playing and his ratio of scored goals per clear chances was relatively low (better last year though)... obviously I like Bellerin's future prospects, as you can't teach pace, but I do worry that he regressed last season, which was obvious to Wenger because there was no way he would have
used Ox as the right side wing - back so often knowing that Barcelona could come calling in the off - season, if he thought otherwise... as for our midfielders, not a single one, minus the more confident Xhaka I watched played for the Swiss national team a couple years ago, who truly makes sense under the traditional Wenger model... Ramsey holds onto the ball too long, gives the ball away cheaply far too often and abandons his defensive responsibilities on a regular basis (doesn't score enough recently to justify): that being said, I've always thought he does possess a little something special, unfortunately he thinks so too... Xhaka is a little too slow to ever boss the midfield and he tends to telegraph his one true strength, his long ball play: although I must admit he did get a bit better during some points in the latter part of last season... it always made me wonder why whenever he played with Coq Wenger always seemed to play Francis in a more advanced role on the pitch... as for Coq, he is way too reckless at the wrong times and has exhibited little offensive prowess yet finds himself in and around the box far too often... let's face it Wenger was ready to throw him in the trash heap when injuries forced him to
use Francis and then he had the nerve to act like this was all part of a bigger Wenger constructed plan... he like Ramsey, Xhaka and Elneny don't offer the skills necessary to satisfy the quick transitory nature of our old offensive scheme or the stout defensive mindset needed to protect the defensive zone so that our offensive players can remain aggressive in the final third... on the front end, we have Ozil, a player of immense skill but stunted by his physical demeanor that tends to offend, the fact that he's been played out of position far too many times since arriving and that the players in front of him, minus Sanchez, make little to no sense considering what he has to offer (especially Giroud); just think about the quick counter-attack offence in Real or the space and protection he receives in the German National team's midfield, where teams couldn't afford to focus too heavily on one individual... this player was a passing «specialist» long before he arrived in North London, so only an arrogant or ignorant individual would try to reinvent the wheel and / or not surround such a talent with the necessary components... in regards to Ox, Walcott and Welbeck, although they all possess serious talents I see them in large part as headless chickens who are on the injury table too much, lack the necessary first - touch and / or lack the finishing flair to warrant their inclusion in a regular starting eleven; I would say that, of the 3, Ox showed the most upside once we went to a back 3, but even he became a bit too consumed by his pending contract talks before the season ended and that concerned me a bit... if I had to choose one of those 3 players to stay on it would be Ox due to his potential as a plausible alternative to Bellerin in that wing - back position should we continue to
use that formation... in Sanchez, we get one of the most committed skill players we've seen on this squad for some years but that could all change soon, if it hasn't already of course... strangely enough, even he doesn't make sense given the constructs of the original Wenger offensive model because he holds onto the ball too long and he will give the ball up a little too often in the offensive zone... a fact that is largely forgotten due to his infectious
energy and the fact that the numbers he has achieved seem to justify the
means... finally, and in many ways most crucially, Giroud, there is nothing about this team or the offensive system that Wenger has traditionally employed that would even suggest such a player would make sense as a starter... too slow, too inefficient and way too easily dispossessed... once again, I think he has some special skills and, at times, has showed some world - class qualities but he's lack of mobility is an albatross around the necks of our offence... so when you ask who would be our best starting 11, I don't have a clue because of the 5 or 6 players that truly deserve a place in this side, 1 just arrived, 3 aren't under contract beyond 2018 and the other was just sold to Juve... man, this is theraputic because following this team is like an addiction to heroin without the benefits
We should not go gang ho for 90 minutes, but let us learn to kill off a game first before dropping the level, and by dropping the level I
mean playing it smartly,
using less energy, keeping the ball well, and wear out our opponents like the way the great Italian teams
used to do or Barca at their best.
The muscles are forced to work with more efficient motions, which
means less energy use and a reduced risk of injury.
less than or equal to lamivudine Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome Antiretroviral therapy, usually
means 1 - 2 drugs,
used in early studies Antiretroviral zidovudine (also known as ZDV) Breastfeeding Baby Friendly Hospital Initiative Breastfeeding and HIV International Transmission Study Combined antiretroviral therapy Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Deoxyribonucleic Acid Exclusive Breastfeeding Enzyme Linked Immunosorbent Assay Food and Agrigulture Organization Fixed dose combination ART, e.g., lamividine, stavudine, and nevirapine Highly Active Antiretroviral Therapy, 3 or more drugs for more effective treatment
used in later studies Human Immunodeficiency virus International Atomic
Energy Agency Infant feeding Infant and young child feeding Lopinavir cubic millimetre Mother - to - Child Transmission of HIV Non-governmental organization Nevirapine Polymerase Chain Reaction People Living with HIV Prevention of Mother - to - Child Transmission Replacement Feeding Ritonavir Ribonucleic acid, one of the three major macromolecules (along with DNA and proteins) that are essential for all known forms of life single dose NVP United Nations Agencies Joint United Nations Programme on HIV / AIDS United Nations Population Fund United Nations Commissioner for Refugees United Nations Children's Fund U.S. Agency for International Development World Alliance for Breastfeeding Action United Nations World Food Programme World Health Assembly WHO 2010 Guidelines on HIV and infant feeding World Health Organization Zidovudine (same drug as AZT)
Using a diaper service
means consuming even
less water and
energy.
We'll reduce it 40 percent by 2020, by 2020 everything we make we'll
use 40 percent
less energy per dollar or per yuan of value, okay; which is good, I
mean, there's no argument to be made against them doing it, but their own economic projections indicate that their economy is going to grow so quickly that they'll be producing more CO2 instead of
less at the end of that period.
Nanotubes are stronger than steel and smaller than any element of silicon - based electronics — the ubiquitous component of today's electrical devices — and have better conductivity, which
means they can potentially process information faster while
using less energy.
Transforming the light from the Sun into electricity is a good
means of generating
energy when we are close to it; however, the further away, the
less light there is to
use.
«It may sound sacrilegious to skip the turkey on Turkey Day, but the planet will thank you,» she says, adding that going meatless will also likely
mean less packaging, transportation, and
energy use on production and manufacturing.
When your cells swell, it makes your muscles create more protein and destroy
less to
use for
energy, which
means that swelling isn't just cosmetics — it's muscle growth as well.
As an intermediate runner, the training sessions here will bolster your movement efficiency,
meaning you'll reduce wasted movement and
use less energy to travel the same distance or speed.
The training session here will bolster your movement efficiency,
meaning you'll reduce wasted movement and
use less energy to travel the same distance or speed.
Once you drop the percentage of carbs from your diet, your body will enter in a state of KETOSIS, start producing KETONES and will
use your fat as a source of
energy because there is no more glucose to
use.Keep in mind that eating
less carbs doesn't
mean that you don't eat anything else - you will loads and loads of healthy fats and moderate amount of protein to keep your going.
Ketosis helps to deprive the bad bacteria of an
energy source...
less energy means less fermentation...
means less acidic byproducts to demineralize teeth and bone (think recession)... Wife, the biological dentist, has been
using this supplemental strategy with her patients for over a decade, way before it became «trendy!»
In addition, replacing some meals with shakes
means less energy exerted for digestion (which
means MORE
energy that you can
use for whatever you want to do each day!).
You
mean someone who weighs 160 lbs and runs a mile
uses less energy than someone who weighs 250 lbs and runs a mile?
Instead of the punch - drunk surge usually associated with
energy drinks, natural varieties are
meant to add a more subtle zest
using less caffeine,
less sugar, and vitamins in place of chemicals.
This not only
means 71 %
less water and 62 %
less energy is
used, but also that nasty pesticide - ridden cotton isn't resting next to your butt, possibly permeating your skin (yes, this is a thing, according to Greenpeace).
Watts in itself
mean little as it is the amount of
energy required to emit a certain amount of light and now that there are different choices from the old plain household incandescent bulb, efficiency has increased so the
energy used is
less related to the light produced.
While this engine is by no
means one of the more powerful ones on the market, it does exactly what it promises — gets you to your destination
using less energy, and therefore
less fuel.
They're not all green
energy, due to the minerals that go into the electronics that most people prefer to read their eBooks on, but because they are
meant to be
used many times over, their impact is drastically
less than that of print books.
After all, an electronic paper display (EPD) will
use up to 99 %
less energy than a traditional display,
meaning that it can be powered by a battery and needs no wires, and will feature paper - like readability in all light conditions.
Making your home more
energy efficient
means that
less of the
energy you
use is wasted.
They also
use up their
energy and are ready to rest for the day, which also
means there's
less chance they'll scratch your lounge or furniture.
When it comes to
energy efficiency, the staff must be aware that just because a product
uses less power does not necessarily
mean it is
energy efficient.
For instance, if more effective cars only
use 70 % of fuel, the portion of fossil sources for
energy use is adjusted down to 80 %, smart planning and collaboration results in 4 people in each car (say 30 %), and a «smart» organization of the working week
means less commuting (80 %; TGIT), then combined effect of this can in theory give a reduction by 0.7 x 0.8 x 0.3 x 0.8 = 0.13.
Using recycled materials in the manufacturing process
uses considerably
less energy than required for producing new products from scratch - 75 %
less in fact,
meaning the impact on the environment is lowered.
Reducing inefficient
use of
energy means that you get 100 % of what you got out before with the inefficient process but you put
less energy in.
And remember,
energy is far from the dominant component of the economy, and phasing in a 50 or 75 % reduction in carbon emissions doesn't
mean a 50 to 75 % reduction in
energy usage — still
less a 50 to 75 % reduction in productive
use of
energy, given likely efficiency gains.
The access devices
use about 95 %
less energy than a regular PC — roughly 1 - 4 watts per device — and with the potential of as many as 30 people all
using just an access device and shared PC, that
means some intense
energy savings.
Replacing those by LEDs
means that the displays will
use less energy, will probably have a longer useful life (LEDs last a very long time), will be mercury - free and more recyclable.
The authors also examined a series of studies on how America's homes and buildings have become increasingly
energy efficient thanks to state and local policies, improved technologies and a growing recognition among builders that
using less energy can
mean saving more money.
Further, increased human - caused CO2 emissions
mean more
energy use, which results in more human productivity since humans generally
use fossil fuel
energy to increase their productivity and reduce their dependency on other
less reliable and higher cost
energy sources.
This
means that
less energy is
used up evaporating water, that
less of the Sun's
energy is reflected and that more heat is stored by buildings and the ground in urban than in rural areas.
This
means that as Duke
Energy and other providers that are doing the same thing — building generation facilities with high capital costs relative to their probable return
using our tax dollars, more or
less directly transporting those dollars into their pockets — sell the electricity built with the resources we helped them build, they will charge us more money for all the electricity they sell.
Energy Star Labels
Energy Star provides labels on some sets that meet their current criteria for low power consumption — generally the label
means that the set might
use at least 20 % or 30 %
less than an average model in its size class (or something like that — varies with the appliance and time).
«The math adds up pretty quickly — when we
use less energy, that's
less energy we have to buy, and that
means less waste and more savings.
«Gross Revenues»
means the total monies received by Grantee from a utility company or other power purchaser (provided, however, that if electricity is sold to a subsidiary or affiliate of Grantee, then, and only then, the gross receipts from the sale of electricity under such contract shall be calculated
using a sale of not
less than the arithmetical average of the prices quoted by market sources of information, which information may be based upon the price paid by any purchaser or purchasers, including Grantee or any subsidiary or affiliate of Grantee, for electricity produced in the Iowa region of the Midwest Independent System Operator («MISO») from operation of wind turbines during the calendar year immediate!y preceding the year in which such electricity production from the Wind
Energy Project occurs, taking into account the aggregate terms associated with such transaction) derived from the sale of electric energy and capacity produced and sold from the WTG's installed on the Premises, net of proportional energy losses associated with the power collection system or utility interconne
Energy Project occurs, taking into account the aggregate terms associated with such transaction) derived from the sale of electric
energy and capacity produced and sold from the WTG's installed on the Premises, net of proportional energy losses associated with the power collection system or utility interconne
energy and capacity produced and sold from the WTG's installed on the Premises, net of proportional
energy losses associated with the power collection system or utility interconne
energy losses associated with the power collection system or utility interconnection.
Thermal equilibrium doesn't
mean the same temperature, if for example, a gas in getting hotter expands and rises becoming
less dense and under
less pressure it can move faster, it's
using thermal
energy to move, there's no
energy lost, it's just become something else, or, as temperature relates to kinetic
energy not thermal
energy then heat capacity comes into play, as water can absorb a huge amount of thermal
energy before there's any rise in temperature, or whatever, but if you're equating all «
energy» to «heat» as thermal
energy then that's a different idea altogether, not all
energy is heat.
And so it does
mean that overall, we
use less energy and that's bringing up this fascinating situation a very large power plant like Diablo Canyon that's running just fine economic.
Many of the appliances for sale in the U.S. are
ENERGY STAR certified, which means that they use less energy than their conventional, non-energy efficient counter
ENERGY STAR certified, which
means that they
use less energy than their conventional, non-energy efficient counter
energy than their conventional, non-
energy efficient counter
energy efficient counterparts.
Benchmark 5: 15kWh / m2 Heating / Cooling The passivhaus standard requires that the building only
uses 15kWh / m2 per year for heating or cooling to maintain the building at 20 ° C. And yes, this does
mean that if you choose keep your Passivhaus building cooler it will
use even
less energy!
Sound design of the revenue side of carbon tax legislation will also ensure that people of limited
means, who
use less energy than average, are made better off, not worse.
Less water use also means less energy
Less water
use also
means less energy
less energy use.