Sentences with phrase «means using something»

Two - factor authentication means using something you know (your password) and something you have (usually your phone) to log into your account.

«If you follow parents - really observe and listen to them - you will notice how they adapt products and tools to their needs, even if that means using something in a way it wasn't originally meant to be used.

So not talking about snakes and bats, I mean using something that resembles an eyeball - such as insects [ultraviolet] or cats - able to see in darker conditions better than humans.

Not exact matches

As Andreessen explains, using this technique means that» [e] ach time you do something, you get to write it down and you get that little rush of endorphins that the mouse gets every time he presses the button in his cage and gets a food pellet.»

Starting off with my favorite holiday of the year, Halloween is one of the most mindless holiday marketing months and I am not talking about zombies; though when I read some of these Facebook pages it makes me wish I was one... What I mean is that it's relatively easy to research and find quality content that can be used to boost interest in your cause, so why not do something more ghoulish?

The ease - of - use factor, lack of big needles, and tiny amounts of blood involved mean the company definitely has something in common with Theranos — Tasso uses microfluidics to work with minimal quantities of blood.

And as you peel back that social conditioning around the idea that admitting you have a beauty routine must mean you're frivolous or maybe shouldn't be taken too seriously, you start to realize almost every woman has something to say — «Actually, I've been using this same mascara for 10 years, and it's the most amazing product.

When something says, «Not for human use,» that means you and I shouldn't eat from it... but lead has the same impact on our dogs as it does on our kids.

To «find» them, people do something called mining, which means using a computer and a lot of electricity to solve math problems that unlock bitcoins as a reward.

The technology world has always been full of colourful individuals; something about using tech as a means to getting rich does tend to attract a certain crowd.

In studying the Best Workplaces for Millennials, we found leading employers use different «meaning archetypes» to help employees connect to their work and feel part of something significant.

The use of the term, «deep - seated,» means that something is firmly established or entrenched.

While the vast majority of professionals would never access a business account from something other than their own (or company's) devices, that doesn't mean a misplaced or stolen smartphone or laptop couldn't be used to access your organization's page, or that someone wouldn't try to hack their way in.

Even though individual consumers rarely have access to the prime interest rate, it should still mean something to you since it affects the cost of taking on a short - term loan and using a credit card.

Offering, operating, or participating in, any marketing or sales plan or program wherein a participant gives or agrees to give a valuable consideration in return (1) for the opportunity to receive compensation in return for inducing other persons to become participants in the plan or program, or (2) for the opportunity to receive something of value when a person induced by the participant induces a new participant to give such valuable consideration, Provided, That the term «compensation,» as used in this paragraph only, does not mean any payment based on actually consummated sales of goods or services to persons who are not participants in the plan or program and who do not purchase such goods or services in order to participate in the plan or program.

There is that ugly word again «scam», it seems like it is used a little too easily lately; it's almost like it maybe means something differently these days.

Your little «on second thought» dig clearly insinuated something about my own religious commitments; your sarcasm was too weak to warrant recognition; and your choice to decry me as «emotional» is a really tired tactic which mean who don't respect women use against women when they've been cornered.

It means something different to every brain that uses it.

Just because it does not use Christ, does not mean it does not use something else in its stead.

When I jumped (and I do mean jumped, a ready or not here I come, head - first dive) from the Sunday - mainstream - church - going - because - it's - what - you - do nominal / cultural Christianity that I was raised with into «serious» Christianity (to use the vernacular: born again, spirit filled, Bible believing, charismatic, etc.) and became what was at the time called a «Jesus freak» (it was 1972) I expected something from the church which was very different than what I found.

Just because an insurance package covers something doesn't mean everyone has to use that particular coverage.

Just because your health care plan provides something does not mean they are forcing you to use it.

13:33), it is used here and elsewhere in the New Testament to mean something evil.

And something should be said about the use of the old set services of the Church — for Lutherans and Episcopalians that means the reading of Morning and Evening Prayer, or Matins and Evensong.

«Awful» in the past was used to describe something that inspired awe; now it is used almost exclusively to mean something extremely bad or unpleasant.

It may not be scientific proof of anything, but it is proof of something of meaning, of psychologicaly use, to that individual.

Speaking personally, it means the grievous loss of something about Catholic observance which always used enormously to impress me as a non-Catholic: the spectacle of Catholics keeping their weekday obligations, often at enormous inconvenience to themselves: as an Anglican, for whom any liturgical obligation was essentially a matter of my own whim, this was immensely attractive: there was the sense that Catholics were under obedience, and that their religion was a real force in their lives, one not to be diverted by secular pressures or values.

We are claiming it for our own, using the concept of «Christian Myth» to mean something valuable and meaningful to us.

I then realised I did not mean that, but I wanted to use the word «satanic» in order to say something positive about the holy spirit (which I do believe).

(In fact, it must be embarrassing for many Protestants to see this group use in its proper name a label that is so much bigger than it and that means something better than the POAU movement.)

I also agree, religion has been used as a means of nefarious coercion, and that is something I deplore as much as you do.

But spiritually understood, where illness is not in the material body as the fever is in the blood, and where medicine is not something external, like drops in a bottle, then fear means: to use and to have used, to have taken the medicine — in the wrong way.

«I love you» means something different every time it is said, depending on who says it, the tone in which it is used, the circumstances surrounding the statement, and the person to whom the statement is addressed.

But scientists can also use fact to mean something that has been tested or observed so many times that there is no longer a compelling reason to keep testing or looking for examples.

The title has also proved highly provocative, for while the writers are using the word «myth» in its various technical senses of something that conveys a deep truth in a nonhistoric form, this word means in everyday speech something that is not true in any sense.

I think when you use it, you are referring to something that is different than I mean when I use it.

Words mean something... especially those words used to shut down the conversation and / or those who would disagree.

As for a «talking snake»... God used many means that are at his disposal to use as he sees fit since he created all things and then at times he uses symbols to represent spiritual things to better show us the spirit behind something.

The search function uses the literal meaning of the emoji, rather than what it represents: «The BibleGateway search engine focuses on these representational emoji — it translates ❤ as heart, for example, not love, even though people generally use ❤ to express love for someone or something.»

Our hymns have used «splendor,» but the word can also mean «weighty,» in the sense of something being really important, and thus being worthy of «honor.»

The Thing that used to mean nothing has become something, perhaps everything.

The word translated «proof, elenchos, normally means disproof rather than proof; but the corresponding verb, elenchein, can be used for the informal establishing of something positive.

Alan Miller uses «spiritual but not religious» to mean something in between defined beliefs like Christianity, Islam.

«Polemics,» as I use it here, does not denote or connote simple hostility, or opposition for its own sake — even though the term has come to mean something like this in ordinary English usage.

«We either use ibo, meaning desire, or nozomi, which describes something unattainable.»

Persons who say they believe in evolution, but who have in mind a process guided by an active God who purposely intervenes or controls the process to accomplish some end, are using the same term that the Darwinists use, but they mean something very different by it.

«The part of us that doesn't die would have to be something SIC immaterial [I believe you mean «immaterial» in the sense of «non-corporeal» as opposed to «having no use or value»]».

When man regards nature only as something to be exploited for immediate gain without concern for the whole good it is meant to serve, he loses even his capacity to make full use of nature.

Where its use is encouraged and is spoken of as something for our good it means unfermented» (p. 118).

equality: «we» may indeed say that gays are equal... but do «they» [the «nay - sayers, if you like, as I don't want to use labels that don't work as in «fundamentalists», «conservatives», or even «liberals» — these terms have been hijacked and reinterpreted to mean something far from their original intent... sorry — pedantic me?!]