Sentences with phrase «meant by another reason»

And what I meant by another reason to vote is that it marks for me which posts I have read already.

A vague provision does not provide an adequate basis for legal debate, that is for reaching a conclusion as to its meaning by reasoned analysis applying legal criteria.

Not exact matches

Back in 2014, he wrote a Financial Times op - ed in which he criticized the virtual currency for being «unsuitable as a means of exchange» and said it was only attractive for two reasons: anonymity — as desired by money launderers and tax evaders — and speculation.

«By the time they've reached leadership positions, employees have been with the company long enough that they are deeply experienced across many levels of the company, meaning they're able to operate more efficiently from a staffing perspective,» the Globe noted, summarizing Griffin's reasoning.

Indeed, the facts (and by «facts,» I mean the real facts) counter this line of reasoning in three clear - cut ways.

I'm not a discerning audiophile by any means, but I really like EVEN's H1 headphones for a couple reasons.

«I was 17 and it was by no means my first time in Nigeria, but for some odd reason, I was particularly bothered by the fumes coming from the generator.

It's by no means a panacea for crippling rural unemployment, if for no other reason than rural outsourcers tend to be very selective employers.

«By all means review what happened and consider what you should do differently in the future, but there is absolutely no good reason to be punitive and self - critical while doing so.

And for that reason, the reverse repurchase agreements are used most frequently by the Reserve Bank, by which I mean, typically on a daily basis.

What I mean by this is keep helping out and adding value so when you finally ask for a link (and if you have a good reason), then you are much more likely to get it.

That's one reason stocks fell sharply in September after a speech by Federal Reserve Bank of Boston president Eric Rosengren, in which he said «a reasonable case can be made» for tightening interest rates — a statement some investors took to mean that rates could rise in September.

That law hasn't eliminated all privacy violations in the health care space, by any means, but when violations occur, they are punished, and the punishment gives actors in that space real reason to avoid them.

However, there are some important reasons why you should plan a content strategy — by which I mean a formally written document — that outlines your plans for success.

It shall be unlawful for any broker, dealer, or exchange, directly or indirectly, to make use of the mails or any means or instrumentality of interstate commerce for the purpose of using any facility of an exchange within or subject to the jurisdiction of the United States to effect any transaction in a security, or to report any such transaction, unless such exchange (1) is registered as a national securities exchange under section 6 of this title, or (2) is exempted from such registration upon application by the exchange because, in the opinion of the Commission, by reason of the limited volume of transactions effected on such exchange, it is not practicable and not necessary or appropriate in the public interest or for the protection of investors to require such registration

Another reason is that the rules include a concept called substantial transformation, which means that if further processing of a non-NAFTA item is done by a NAFTA partner, the non-NAFTA items are «transformed» and are deemed to have been produced in the United States, Canada or Mexico.

The simplest reason for tomorrow's miss is shown in the following Morgan Stanley chart, which predicted the July 209K print with dead - on precision, and which extrapolates the recent Y / Y slowdown in job growth to only 136K jobs in August (which, in the current «bad news is good news» environment, should be sufficient to send stocks to new all time highs as it will mean an even greater delay by the Fed).

It's obvious that the Old Testament rules were made up by the community leaders — some for good reasons particular to that situation and others as a rather heavy - handed means of control.

Marr does take the challenge of pluralism seriously, but he is wrong because he thinks that the transcending of religious speech and reasoning (which is what he means by «philosophy») is the sine qua non for meeting such a challenge.

Atheists: I know many there are many people that practice religion just by fanaticism, I've seen many people in my opinion stupid (excuse the word) praying to saints hopping to solve their problems by repeating pre-made sentences over and over, but there are others different, I don't think Religion and Science need to be opposites, I believe in God, I'm Catholic and I have many reasons to believe in him, I don't think however that we should pray instead of looking for the cause and applying a solution, Atheists think they are smart because they focus on Science and technology instead of putting their faith in a God, I don't think God will solve our problems, i think he gave us the means to solve them by ourselves that's were God is, also I think that God created everything but not as a Magical thing but stablishing certain rules like Physics and Quimics etc. he's not an idiot and he knew how to make it so everything was on balance, he's the Scientist of Scientist the Mathematic of Mathematics, the Physician of Physicians, from the tiny little fact that a mosquito, an insect species needs to feed from blood from a completely different species, who created the mosquitos that way?

Taylor aims to bring about this future by means of his own unaided reason, which may require a purge of all those who are not in agreement with the new agenda» a prospect he seems to relish more than regret.

Oh, by all means, let's compare taking a pill for your own personal health reasons to raping and beating someone else.

He begins by unpacking Aron's political reason, asking: «What does it mean to think politically?»

Chesterton liked to talk about it as the difference between rationalism and reason, by which he meant common sense.

But as long as we're honest about the meaning of our disagreement, which is ensured by intellectually honest people like you, there is no reason we can't find some civility in an agreement to disagree.

By sin you mean an ethical system determined by an intangible higher being vs one where you take full responsibility of your choices using logic and reasoBy sin you mean an ethical system determined by an intangible higher being vs one where you take full responsibility of your choices using logic and reasoby an intangible higher being vs one where you take full responsibility of your choices using logic and reason?

If America attacks Iran for any reason (treaties, foreign interests and allied ties) other than its own direct national security being threatened at her doorstep, than I speak for myself primarily when I say, Iran should do all it can in its power to secure her existence and future by any means.

That meant that there is no direct conceptual approach to God, nor from God to human reality, by analogical reasoning, but God's presence is hidden in the particulars of history.

If by God is meant the Ground of Being, the Essence of Being, the Absolute, the Weltgeist, and all similar expressions, the reply is still No, for according to Schweitzer such terms «denote nothing actual, but something conceived in abstractions which for that reason is also absolutely meaningless» (The Philosophy of Civilization [Macmillan, 1949], p. 304).

Admittedly this control, as opposed to Soviet methods, is by no means «water - tight» for the reasons indicated.)

By civil righteousness, Luther meant that people, by the powers of reason with which they are endowed, can refrain from murdering one another, or stealing, or lyinBy civil righteousness, Luther meant that people, by the powers of reason with which they are endowed, can refrain from murdering one another, or stealing, or lyinby the powers of reason with which they are endowed, can refrain from murdering one another, or stealing, or lying.

But what does this assertion of internal relatedness mean, particularly in light of the fact that Whitehead tells us in Adventures of Ideas (p. 157) that the traditional doctrine of «internal relations is distorted by reason of its description in terms of language adapted to presuppositions of the Newtonian type»?

Betz is on safer ground when he suggests that «the ultimate point of the analogia entis, as employed by Przywara, is precisely not by philosophical means to close the gap between God and creatures, grace and nature, reason and revelation (as Barth seems to have feared), but rather to widen it.»

«matt — just because we can use science and reason to explain natural events doesn't mean there isn't a god, case in point, rainbows, a sign given by god to Noah can be explained by science but is still a promise made by god» But thats not proof of anything.

just because we can use science and reason to explain natural events doesn't mean there isn't a god, case in point, rainbows, a sign given by god to Noah can be explained by science but is still a promise made by god

The connection, by means of a middle term, between elements of the major and minor premises, gives a reason why something is what it is; the syllogism expresses a cause or ground.

We have here an updated version of Kant's criticism of the Leibnizian monad in the «Amphiboly» in the Critique of Pure Reason: the spatially situated existent is indeed made up of relations rather than being a substance containing its «inhering» attributes internally as predicates which are part of its concept; only the relations are no longer those of the synthetically connected manifold, but the relational connections between the particulars of modern functional or mathematical logic, expanded to include within itself the spatial and temporal relations which Kant could only account for by means of the synthetic a priori.

Pope Benedict wrote often that beauty is an arrow that wounds — by that, he meant that it penetrates hearts which might never be turned by reason or virtue.

What availed as the common wisdom of mankind until the day before yesterday — for example, that man, woman, mother, and father name natural realities as well as social roles, that children issue naturally from their union, that the marital union of man and woman is the foundation of human society and provides the optimal home for the flourishing of children — all this is now regarded by many as obsolete and even hopelessly bigoted, as court after court, demonstrating that this revolution has profoundly transformed even the meaning of reason itself, has declared that this bygone wisdom now fails even to pass the minimum legal threshold of rational cogency.

Until the recent past the main emphasis has been on apologetics, catechesis and other reasoned approaches, but there are complementary steps to be taken towards the expressive and inspirational by featuring less rational and doctrinal means, such assacred art, that can in their distinct manner explore the way of beauty.1

The fundamental reason why mission - induced sobriety is often impermanent is that homeless alcoholics are very difficult to help by any means.

In a period like our own, when we have lost our sense of direction, when we do not know where our goal is, when our myths have lost their meaning and comprehensive reason has been eclipsed by calculating technical reason, there is need for a rebirth of imaginative vision.

By all means post it, so I can show your error inlogic and / or reason.

Here, we apply the «ontological principle» which, in this context, means that history must not only be interpreted either by reason or by communication, but in the light of the «diachron transcendence» of passed and future events.

I would like to begin the examination of the validity of the linguistic method for determining the validity of God - talk by a clarification of what is meant by the terms «empirical,» «truth,» «verifiability» and «reason.»

It represents the betrayal of reason — man's highest and most characteristic power and the principal means by which his life may be safely guided.

If the price of virginity is the repression and distortion of that which is good and wondrous; if virginity is achieved by surrounding sex with guilt and fear; if the quest for virginity drives them to an unhealthy dependency on some form of autoeroticism as a preferred means to release their sexual energy; then for those reasons I would say the price of virginity is too high on my scale of values.

By the insufficiency of reason we do not mean to deny the «autonomy» of science.

That realm of nature which used to be beyond human understanding and control, with which, therefore, one could only establish a creative relation by means of this hypothesis «God», is now more and more being conquered by reason and technique.17

This, of course, does not mean that there; is, avoidably as well as unavoidably, much that is «undemocratic» in the Church, if for no other reason than that the baptized children must slowly be led by the Church to a free and responsible decision of personal faith without which no adult can be a member of the Church in the fullest sense.