There is, then, a cognitive element in the encounter, but this is not of the sort that is usually
meant by knowledge.
Within the setting of his life, such knowledge was quite unimportant, whereas what
we mean by knowledge available but unknown to us actually contributes to determine the conditions of our own lives, and because we know it is not familiar to us, gives them a threatening and sinister character.
And what
I mean by knowledge is knowing the product that you sell — the parts and pieces of a home as well as the new - home sales process from soup to nuts.
Not exact matches
«So when Trump says he wants to «open up» libel law, he really
means (if he has the slightest
knowledge of the law) that he wants to open up — to change — the First Amendment, which, beginning in 1964, has been held to require in cases brought
by public figures, proof that what was said was false, and that the newspaper knew or suspected that it was false.
The U.S. Senate voted today to repeal a set of rules approved under the Obama administration that were
meant to safeguard consumer data from being collected
by internet service providers without a user's
knowledge or consent.
It also
means that if one chunk of gray matter is destroyed
by, say, a stroke, new circuits may be laid in another location to compensate, essentially rewiring a person's store of
knowledge and memories.
By technical skills, I
mean specialized
knowledge that is hard to teach yourself on your own.
By limited resources I
mean a shortage of money or
knowledge.
While Guided Investing is a robo - advisor,
meaning client portfolios are shaped
by market theory computer algorithms instead of actual humans, the
knowledge behind the recommendations comes from Merrill Lynch.
It updates and refines our understanding of how the IMF seeks to wield ideational power
by analysing the Fund's post-crash their ability to influence what constitutes legitimate
knowledge, and their ability fix
meanings attached to economic policies within the social process of constructing economic orthodoxy.
Though
by no
means an expert on AIDS, I have more than a casual
knowledge of and interest in the subject.
How do YOU know god is real, and what defense can you offer for the
means by which you acquired that
knowledge?
We have an apparatus for discovery unrivaled
by the ages, yet every new fact
means less than the previously discovered one, for we lack what turns facts to
knowledge: the information of what the facts are for.
If you desire a mindset that can easily ignore all of Christianity's faults, then avoid acquiring
knowledge by all
means.
Likewise when God says «Let there be light,» that is much more understandable
by saying it
means the «Light of Understanding,» like invention of language and tools, and the
knowledge of right and wrong.
Traditionally experience was understood as
meaning the direct
knowledge acquired
by (or type of cognition utilized
by) our five senses.
Well, seriously, I think God can cure anything... but it doesn't
mean that God never give the
KNOWLEDGE to the human being to treat sickness
by himself.
The production of
knowledge, decemination of information, and coqunication of the data are very much controlled
by the TNCs, the industrialized states, and the global news agencies of the West through the highly sophiscated electronic
means.
``... [the] gulf between the Church and the scientific mind... widens with each generation, and modern
means of diffusing
knowledge by the press, radio, and film, have brought us now to such a pass that the Christian, and especially the Catholic, whose beliefs are enriched in their religious manifestation
by the ceremonies and practices of a most ancient past, finds himself considered the initiate of a recondite cult whose practices are not only unintelligible to men around him, but savour to them of superstition and magic.»
8 To one there is given through the Spirit a message of wisdom, to another a message of
knowledge by means of the same Spirit, 9 to another faith
by the same Spirit, to another gifts of healing
by that one Spirit, 10 to another miraculous powers, to another prophecy, to another distinguishing between spirits
Yet
by means of «presentational immediacy» occasions project the concrescence of contemporaries as possible «atomizations of the potential extensive continuum according to available
knowledge of their past.
If a problem arises which is not dealt with clearly in the Qur» an or in the Sunnah, the answer is sought in the schools of thought, the theories worked out
by «leaders of thought» who have been careful students of the Qur» an and the Sunnah, have thought profoundly about their inner
meanings and understand their general principles, and who have special
knowledge of virtue and the general welfare.
By scientific method we
mean all ways in which reliable, communicable
knowledge based on experience in every area may be gained.
To judge the two realities
by a supposed
knowledge of what is «really» real, gained
by some
means alien to both, is to abandon the perspective of the history of religions.
It was sad so I just gave them a brief run through of my astronomical
knowledge and of the great amount I didn't know, followed
by me saying that just because something isn't known doesn't
mean we can fill in the gaps with magic.
Whether
by «perfect» we
mean simply sinless, or whether we
mean perfect in
knowledge and love and judgment and other aspects as well, it is simply impossible for anyone who is human to be this.
He describes with great accuracy the necessities of Christian existence in which love is the
meaning of all
knowledge and action, but in which man must cope with vast and threatening powers and institutions which are ruled
by the distorted and misdirected passions of the corrupt human spirit.
As an expert on various religious cultures, and with a
knowledge of the role of religion in personality structure and function, the specialist is in a position to offer relevant insight for psychodynamic diagnosis, for evaluation of the manner in which religious issues should be dealt with in treatment, and the
means by which religious resources may be used in rehabilitation.
But Buber believes that Paul
means by faith belief in a truth, a kind of objective
knowledge, whereas surely for Paul faith in Christ is never separated from love to all the members of the body of Christ and to every man.
Searle would respond
by saying that this contradicts the ordinary language
meaning of «knowing a language,» but nevertheless, the point here is one about the type of
knowledge in the person operating the Box.
But gradually the concept of profession took on a more limited
meaning and came to be used primarily to refer to the
knowledge and skills possessed
by practitioners of specialized traditions such as law, medicine and divinity.
The ecclesiastical magisterium is now replaced
by a scholarly magisterium, for only they have the
knowledge to uncover this history and it is only in this history that the
meaning of faith can be found!
means that these financial fountain springs has no planed directions or control over them to serve towards the developments of the Ranks and reducing gap between them
by investing in a total su - sta - in - able development of all those ranks as to morals,
knowledge, skills and their personal business investments.
It is not
meant to suggest a special religious power, faculty, or sense possessed
by some few individuals as a
means whereby they attain special
knowledge or truth unavailable
by ordinary avenues.
By that I only
mean to ask, «Does Islam in fact lead people away from the
knowledge of the one God of Abraham?»
Americans in the two opposing strains of Protestantism, the evangelical and liberal, along with many adherents of Pentecostal and holiness cults, would agree that religious
knowledge is special
knowledge that can not be taught or learned
by ordinary
means (Philip J. Lee, Against the Protestant Gnostics, 113).
With that in mind, I generally discount all of the science and
knowledge that has been developed throughout human history as being useful for living in the world we understand, but not truth
by any
means.
Whitehead suggests that teachers should facilitate what he calls the student's «concrete vision»
by allowing the student to utilize knowledge: «By utilizing an idea I mean relating it to that stream compounded of sense perceptions, feelings, hopes, desires and of mental activities adjusting thought to thought, which forms our life» (AE 3
by allowing the student to utilize
knowledge: «
By utilizing an idea I mean relating it to that stream compounded of sense perceptions, feelings, hopes, desires and of mental activities adjusting thought to thought, which forms our life» (AE 3
By utilizing an idea I
mean relating it to that stream compounded of sense perceptions, feelings, hopes, desires and of mental activities adjusting thought to thought, which forms our life» (AE 3).
By removing the wide segments of knowledge and skill with which the school ordinarily deals from all explicit relation to religion, the meaning of religion is falsified; by being made a specialized concern, it is robbed of its essential comprehensiveness, and the school studies become occasions for propagating the gospel of autonomy and self - sufficienc
By removing the wide segments of
knowledge and skill with which the school ordinarily deals from all explicit relation to religion, the
meaning of religion is falsified;
by being made a specialized concern, it is robbed of its essential comprehensiveness, and the school studies become occasions for propagating the gospel of autonomy and self - sufficienc
by being made a specialized concern, it is robbed of its essential comprehensiveness, and the school studies become occasions for propagating the gospel of autonomy and self - sufficiency.
And no a belief does not
mean actual
knowledge, so when one proclaims a belief, it something that
by definition can not be proven, so no I don't have to present evidence in order to declare a belief, but if one is saying outright that angels do not exist as being the absolute truth, then one should present evidence.
It can
mean what it says
by «free act of will,»
by «contingency,»
by «
knowledge,» and so on.
The truth in this definition must
by no
means be overlooked, and it needs to be enforced in times such as these which have gone astray in so much flatulent and unfruitful
knowledge, so that doubtless now, just as in Socrates» age, only much more, it is advisable that people should be starved a little bit Socratically.
While this veneration of the past and suspicion of the new is
by no
means absent in our world today, it is no longer the dominant attitude of modern man concerning the source of true
knowledge.
When we say that God «knows» something, «
knowledge» can not
mean the same thing as it does when we speak of human knowing, because the created order works within parameters given
by the Creator — parameters within which the Creator can not be confined.
As Dom Gregory Dix, in a now famous section of his book The Shape of the Liturgy, put the matter, Christians through the ages have known of no better and more appropriate way to remember» Jesus than
by participating in the offering of the Eucharist as «the continual memory» of his passion and death — which also
means, of course, the life which preceded Calvary and the
knowledge of the risen Lord which followed the crucifixion.
His death on the cross has often been gravely transvestied
by well -
meaning Christians when they imagined that he faced the cross with the secret
knowledge that less than thirty - six hours later he would be alive again and ready to ascend into heaven.
But, starting from the symbol,
by means of contemplation and true imagination with its evocative power, such
knowledge grasps the figurative presence as an epiphany of the transcendent.
He possesses miraculous powers,
by means of which he converts untold multitudes; he lives for hundreds of kalpas [ages] and displays hundreds of Buddha - bodies, attains unheard - of
knowledge and accomplishes unheard - of wonders.
The contradiction is denied, on this interpretation, only
by exempting God from those principles
by means of which we can attain any
knowledge of him in the first place.
By «Synthesis» Holloway did not
mean an all - encompassing intellectual straightjacket - a neatly packaged last word on every detailed talent of
knowledge - far from it.