Who / what do
you mean by the Creator?
Therefore, if
we mean by creator an efficient (or final) cause, creativity is not a creator, certainly not the creator of God.
Indeed if one rightly understands that which the Bible
means by the Creator, he has rightly understood the whole Bible.
Not exact matches
For viewers, this
means that when you watch a video
by a
creator that takes tips, you'll see an icon in the left corner of the screen.
The
creators of new TV miniseries «Waco» always
meant for it to show the whole truth of the 1993 Waco siege,
by telling the story from multiple perspectives: especially those that weren't told
by the media.
I think it's important to have a brief standup meeting with all the key content
creators each week; just because there is an accessible calendar doesn't
mean everyone is living and dying
by it like the person who maintains it.
Most likely not but that does not
mean that it just appeared one day out of the blue, it was built
by an intelligent
creator.
And thus it is that the American Proposition, which began with the declaration that all men are endowed
by their
Creator with an unalienable right to life, now
means that they are also endowed (
by whom it is not clear) with the right to die.
The talks of the conference have sought to explain what it
means to say we have faith in God
by looking at the evidence for His existence and his eternal plan to found the Church as man's true environment in which he comes into contact with his
creator.
Only purposeless praise can cope effectively with our narcissism, with the grossness of our self - preoccupation even in worshiping the
Creator, because
by definition praise is not a
means to an end but the end itself.
«For WE hold these truths to be self evident, that ALL
mean are CREATED equal and are endowed
by their
CREATOR with certain... rights».
And two images ignorantly used together can create
meanings not foreseen
by their
creator.
This
means that they should be living only according to the way of life / values as taught
by the
Creator and that he is to be acknowledged as the Only Truth.
By all
means give your kids telescopes and microscopes so they can see the beauty, handiwork and uniqueness of the
Creator!
It is a possibility, but
by no
means is there any evidence of a
creator.
By the way by no means does this mean that I am particularly against Islam, I am also against Judaism, Christianity, and any unproven dark age manifestation of a all knowing, creator, If there was a god he sure does «nt need help enforcing his edicts and morals, remember that if there is a god then as many religions state, people will be judged upon there beliefs and sins after death and spend eternity in heaven or hell, so why is it so important for people to butt in and start trying to control each other and force people to believe in something that many think is absurd and insan
By the way
by no means does this mean that I am particularly against Islam, I am also against Judaism, Christianity, and any unproven dark age manifestation of a all knowing, creator, If there was a god he sure does «nt need help enforcing his edicts and morals, remember that if there is a god then as many religions state, people will be judged upon there beliefs and sins after death and spend eternity in heaven or hell, so why is it so important for people to butt in and start trying to control each other and force people to believe in something that many think is absurd and insan
by no
means does this
mean that I am particularly against Islam, I am also against Judaism, Christianity, and any unproven dark age manifestation of a all knowing,
creator, If there was a god he sure does «nt need help enforcing his edicts and morals, remember that if there is a god then as many religions state, people will be judged upon there beliefs and sins after death and spend eternity in heaven or hell, so why is it so important for people to butt in and start trying to control each other and force people to believe in something that many think is absurd and insane.
This
means that regardless of a person's physical capacity, or social standing, they have an inherent moral worth gifted to them
by a
Creator God.
It
means only that the creation reflects what is the basic character of God in the fullness of deity — the
Creator is not denied
by what goes on in creation, save when there is willful wrongdoing.
When we say that God «knows» something, «knowledge» can not
mean the same thing as it does when we speak of human knowing, because the created order works within parameters given
by the
Creator — parameters within which the
Creator can not be confined.
Rather, he is the
creator by means of something that is primarily a
means of relationship.
By means of this distinction, one can argue that, although the primary sense of a term with respect to how it means is the sense it has as applied to a creature, or ordinary individual, the primary sense of the term with respect to what is meant by it is the sense it has as applied to the Creator, or eminent individua
By means of this distinction, one can argue that, although the primary sense of a term with respect to how it
means is the sense it has as applied to a creature, or ordinary individual, the primary sense of the term with respect to what is
meant by it is the sense it has as applied to the Creator, or eminent individua
by it is the sense it has as applied to the
Creator, or eminent individual.
It does not
mean, either, that God can not or does not intervene in human affairs, as though the universe was a sealed machine, set and started
by the
Creator ages ago and running ever since in ways Immutably determined at the beginning.
The womb, therefore, becomes the
means by which the
Creator can trulytake to Himself the nature of the creature, using the same
means by which this creaturely nature is formed.
It was fascinating, and I think important, to see the development over the centuries of the philosophical rift which eventually grew between science and religion, as a result of which many scientists (although
by no
means all) abandoned any idea of a
Creator God.
That's what it
means to be all knowing and all powerful and the
creator -
by definition.
The programs taught me about (1) admitting I was beat, (2) coming to believe in something greater than myself (eventually a higher power)(many evolutions and concepts of HP, all of these at one time or another: nature, the 12 steps,
creator, Love, spiritual principles)(Step 3) applying my low self worth and gigantic Ego to these spiritual principles (4) write down my liabilities and assets (5) share them with another and my higher power (6 & 7) ask for the liabilites to be removed and be patient with the process (8) Make a list of all that were harmed
by me (9) make amends to such folks except whn to do so would injure them or myself (10) take a daily inventory of my day, checking for snafus,
mean temperment, arrogance etc (11) meditation and prayer to communicate to my higher power and quiet reflection to listen for the Truth (12) after having a spiritual awakening as a result of working these steps, help others if they wish for help because now I am in the position to assist.
By «
creator» which of the hundreds of
creator gods from around the world do you think they
meant?
I see his ministry more of inviting people to experience life as it was
meant to be lived
by the Loving -
Creator - God instead of continuing the futility of a life without God.
By human, I
mean that nature which the
Creator founded in us at the beginning, and which he undertook to restore.
The kid is right in a way Religion is a way to enslave people to the thinking of that particular religion Jesus didn't come to form religion but to give us a way to get to Heaven through him The only mission of a church is to teach you about God's love to help the poor to love one another to do things that Christ would do There is a penalty for not being saved
by the blood of Jesus There will be a separation from God for all eternity God made us for one reason to love Him the
Creator of all The
meaning of life
Whatever we
mean by «God the
creator,» God exceeds, proving that word and concept can not contain Him.
Does any one know the
meanings of word HUMAN, it is HU, «HIS» MANN, DESIRE, «HIS DESIRE» us the human, in violation of of «HIS» commandments, THE TRUTH ABSOLUTE, OUR
CREATOR, Yahoo, YA, Attentive
by heart and mind, base word for English word yes, and Ya in Arabic, Hoo, «HE» translated from Latin to English Bible.
«When faith in the
Creator is replaced
by faith in human ability to solve all problems
by technological
means, humanity has fallen into the sin of idolatry... distorted trust for our salvation in other sources of power.»
You also might want to read the Treaty of Tripoli and consider that the term
Creator by default does not mean christian
Creator by default does not
mean christian
creatorcreator
It was the Light because the knew
creator was of Light but searched for it in the wrong sources, or made an idole of light sources to worship rather than reading and looking in to ones self
by reading the light that is within the books that was
meant for them to read thing and believe in to submission!.
And it
means that faithful Catholics who believe in colorblind equality before the law, the dignity and value of every human life at all stages and in all conditions, marriage rightly understood, and an ethic of love that recognizes the truths built into us
by the
Creator and confirmed
by reason will be considered... well, deplorable.
By «idolatry» I
mean a religion which either does not know, or else refuses to recognize, that there is no god but God, and which therefore worships the creature instead of worshipping the
creator.
Even though the
creators of the National Curriculum are keen to emphasise the importance of what they call «the English literary heritage»,
by which they
mean «authors with an enduring appeal that transcends the period in which they were writing, and who have played a significant role in the development of literature in English» [Qualifications and Curriculum Authority 2007, 71), their choice of recommended authors reveals a set of post-Protestant secular assumptions which need to be challenged if Catholic culture is to flourish in Catholic schools.
Without some philosophical understanding of what is
meant by the word «
Creator» this whole sentence is basically meaningless.
some that with out self thought knowledge who called themselves athiest are really confused and truelly believe what they are saying even when wrong they believe to be telling the truth now that is not all atheist some are really cruel and
mean to deceived others - those who are not stading in solid ground are those worth reaching out to - cause they need to know truth from false testimony... those who trully know God can not depart from him but there are those who blindly fight their way away from him... evil is blind and can't see the presence of god — that was God's course for rebelion... only a pure soul can be reach
by the
creator now that is not that easy to keep so its only through faith and the acceptance of jesus sacrifice for the human race that is posible to find the way and acceptance required
by God in his second agreement to menkind... jesus was the lamb who took all our sin so even with a blind soul one can find the way to the
creator and at one time if any find themselves in the presence fo the lord our God the reason we are here...
In view of all that inheres in the first four «words» and in the light of what is there already affirmed both explicitly and
by inference; in consideration of ancient Eastern modes of thought and the characteristic psychological identification one always made of his own life with the life of immediate and also more distant progenitors; in recognition of the
meaning of Covenant, together with Israel's faith in God's creation and his continuing exercise of the powers and prerogatives of
Creator and Sustainer - in acknowledgment of all this it is apparent that the intention of the fifth commandment is to establish and perpetuate not merely the parental but
by and through the parental the divine claim upon every life in Israel.
some that with out self thought knowledge who called themselves athiest are really confused and truelly believe what they are saying even when wrong they believe to be telling the truth now that is not all atheist some are really cruel and
mean to deceived others — those who are not stading in solid ground are those worth reaching out to - cause they need to know truth from false testimony... those who trully know God can not depart from him but there are those who blindly fight their way away from him... evil is blind and can't see the presence of god — that was God's course for rebelion... only a pure soul can be reach
by the
creator now that is not that easy to keep so its only through faith and the acceptance of jesus sacrifice for the human race that is posible to find the way and acceptance required
by God in his second agreement to menkind... jesus was the lamb who took all our sin so even with a blind soul one can find the way to the
creator and at one time if any find themselves in the presence of the lord our God the reason we are here...
But Yahweh also is a
creator; Yahweh's very creation ex nihilo is found comparable to the creation of some Supreme Beings of primitive peoples who create
by means of pure thought and will.
All of which may (or may not) justify the comment that, at its highest and purest, the sincere sacrifice was (and is, properly conceived) a rite of communion between man and God, and a satisfying
means by which the creature pays his debt of gratitude and love to the
creator.
1614 In his preaching Jesus unequivocally taught the original
meaning of the union of man and woman as the
Creator willed it from the beginning permission given
by Moses to divorce one's wife was a concession to the hardness of hearts.106 The matrimonial union of man and woman is indissoluble: God himself has determined it «what therefore God has joined together, let no man put asunder.
I'm trying to understand how one determines what «certain rights... retained
by the people»
means in the Ninth Amendment, and why growing and consuming plants is not an «unalienable right endowed
by my
Creator».
Meaningfulness is not given automatically, but is made during the course of everyday living
by people exercising their capabilities as
meaning - makers and
creators of value.
Aspiration and middle England had been abandoned in favour of the poor, they claim, while the «wealth
creators» —
by which they
mean its owners — have been abused and threatened with spiteful taxes.
Some is emotional knowledge, some is the knowledge held
by the
creator and for the neurobiologist it gives us a
means of understanding how the brain is organised,» says Zeki.
But that doesn't
mean you should rule out yoga, says Chrissy Carter,
creator of Beginning Yoga
by Gaiam ($ 10; amazon.com) and a NYC - based yoga instructor.