The car spotted on Indian soil could be just another test mule for components
meant for future models based on the Elantra platform.
Not exact matches
You cant run America like a business at a certain point «The Workers» have to
mean more then the bottom line, or China will be the
model of our
future, a form of marshal law «Life Credits
for eating well, working well, and precedent of making $ 2.00 per hour!
This is an incredibly difficult question to answer
for a variety of reasons, most importantly because over the years our once vaunted «beautiful» style of play has become a shadow of it's former self, only to be replaced by a less than stellar «plug and play» mentality where players play out of position and adjustments / substitutions are rarely forthcoming before the 75th minute... if you look at our current players, very few would make sense in the traditional Wengerian system... at present, we don't have the personnel to move the ball quickly from deep - lying position, efficient one touch midfielders that can make the necessary through balls or the disciplined and pacey forwards to stretch defences into wide positions, without the aid of the backs coming up into the final 3rd, so that we can attack the defensive lanes in the same clinical fashion we did years ago... on this current squad, we have only 1 central defender on staf, Mustafi, who seems to have any prowess in the offensive zone or who can even pass two zones through so that we can advance play quickly out of our own end (I have seen some inklings that suggest Holding might have some offensive qualities but too early to tell)... unfortunately Mustafi has a tendency to get himself in trouble when he gets overly aggressive on the ball... from our backs out wide, we've seen pace from the likes of Bellerin and Gibbs and the spirited albeit offensively stunted play of Monreal, but none of these players possess the skill - set required in the offensive zone
for the new Wenger scheme which requires deft touches, timely runs to the baseline and consistent crossing, especially when Giroud was playing and his ratio of scored goals per clear chances was relatively low (better last year though)... obviously I like Bellerin's
future prospects, as you can't teach pace, but I do worry that he regressed last season, which was obvious to Wenger because there was no way he would have used Ox as the right side wing - back so often knowing that Barcelona could come calling in the off - season, if he thought otherwise... as
for our midfielders, not a single one, minus the more confident Xhaka I watched played
for the Swiss national team a couple years ago, who truly makes sense under the traditional Wenger
model... Ramsey holds onto the ball too long, gives the ball away cheaply far too often and abandons his defensive responsibilities on a regular basis (doesn't score enough recently to justify): that being said, I've always thought he does possess a little something special, unfortunately he thinks so too... Xhaka is a little too slow to ever boss the midfield and he tends to telegraph his one true strength, his long ball play: although I must admit he did get a bit better during some points in the latter part of last season... it always made me wonder why whenever he played with Coq Wenger always seemed to play Francis in a more advanced role on the pitch... as
for Coq, he is way too reckless at the wrong times and has exhibited little offensive prowess yet finds himself in and around the box far too often... let's face it Wenger was ready to throw him in the trash heap when injuries forced him to use Francis and then he had the nerve to act like this was all part of a bigger Wenger constructed plan... he like Ramsey, Xhaka and Elneny don't offer the skills necessary to satisfy the quick transitory nature of our old offensive scheme or the stout defensive mindset needed to protect the defensive zone so that our offensive players can remain aggressive in the final third... on the front end, we have Ozil, a player of immense skill but stunted by his physical demeanor that tends to offend, the fact that he's been played out of position far too many times since arriving and that the players in front of him, minus Sanchez, make little to no sense considering what he has to offer (especially Giroud); just think about the quick counter-attack offence in Real or the space and protection he receives in the German National team's midfield, where teams couldn't afford to focus too heavily on one individual... this player was a passing «specialist» long before he arrived in North London, so only an arrogant or ignorant individual would try to reinvent the wheel and / or not surround such a talent with the necessary components... in regards to Ox, Walcott and Welbeck, although they all possess serious talents I see them in large part as headless chickens who are on the injury table too much, lack the necessary first - touch and / or lack the finishing flair to warrant their inclusion in a regular starting eleven; I would say that, of the 3, Ox showed the most upside once we went to a back 3, but even he became a bit too consumed by his pending contract talks before the season ended and that concerned me a bit... if I had to choose one of those 3 players to stay on it would be Ox due to his potential as a plausible alternative to Bellerin in that wing - back position should we continue to use that formation... in Sanchez, we get one of the most committed skill players we've seen on this squad
for some years but that could all change soon, if it hasn't already of course... strangely enough, even he doesn't make sense given the constructs of the original Wenger offensive
model because he holds onto the ball too long and he will give the ball up a little too often in the offensive zone... a fact that is largely forgotten due to his infectious energy and the fact that the numbers he has achieved seem to justify the
means... finally, and in many ways most crucially, Giroud, there is nothing about this team or the offensive system that Wenger has traditionally employed that would even suggest such a player would make sense as a starter... too slow, too inefficient and way too easily dispossessed... once again, I think he has some special skills and, at times, has showed some world - class qualities but he's lack of mobility is an albatross around the necks of our offence... so when you ask who would be our best starting 11, I don't have a clue because of the 5 or 6 players that truly deserve a place in this side, 1 just arrived, 3 aren't under contract beyond 2018 and the other was just sold to Juve... man, this is theraputic because following this team is like an addiction to heroin without the benefits
Time
for some brutal honesty... this team, as it stands, is in no better position to compete next season than they were 12 months ago, minus the fact that some fans have been easily snowed by the acquisition of Lacazette, the free transfer LB and the release of Sanogo... if you look at the facts carefully you will see a team that still has far more questions than answers... to better show what I
mean by this statement I will briefly discuss the current state of affairs on a position - by - position basis... in goal we have 4 potential candidates, but in reality we have only 1 option with any real
future and somehow he's the only one we have actively tried to get rid of
for years because he and his father were a little too involved on social media and he got caught smoking (funny how people still defend Wiltshire under the same and far worse circumstances)... you would think we would want to keep any goaltender that Juventus had interest in, as they seem to have a pretty good history when it comes to that position... as far as the defenders on our current roster there are only a few individuals whom have the skill and / or youth worthy of our time and / or investment, as such we should get rid of anyone who doesn't meet those simple requirements, which
means we should get rid of DeBouchy, Gibbs, Gabriel, Mertz and loan out Chambers to see if last seasons foray with Middlesborough was an anomaly or a prediction of things to come... some fans have lamented wildly about the return of Mertz to the starting lineup due to his FA Cup performance but these sort of pie in the sky meanderings are indicative of what's wrong with this club and it's wishy - washy fan - base... in addition to these moves the club should aggressively pursue the acquisition of dominant and mobile CB to stabilize an all too fragile defensive group that has self - destructed on numerous occasions over the past 5 seasons... moving forward and building on our need to re-establish our once dominant presence throughout the middle of the park we need to target a CDM then do whatever it takes to get that player into the fold without any of the usual nickel and diming we have become famous
for (this kind of ruthless haggling has cost us numerous special players and certainly can't help make the player in question feel good about the way their
future potential employer feels about them)... in order
for us to become dominant again we need to be strong up the middle again from Goalkeeper to CB to DM to ACM to striker, like we did in our most glorious years before and during Wenger's reign... with this in mind, if we want Ozil to be that dominant attacking midfielder we can't keep leaving him exposed to constant ridicule about his lack of defensive prowess and provide him with the proper players in the final third... he was never a good defensive player in Real or with the German National squad and they certainly didn't suffer as a result of his presence on the pitch... as
for the rest of the midfield the blame falls squarely in the hands of Wenger and Gazidis, the fact that Ramsey, Ox, Sanchez and even Ozil were allowed to regularly start when none of the aforementioned had more than a year left under contract is criminal
for a club of this size and financial might... the fact that we could find money
for Walcott and Xhaka, who weren't even guaranteed starters,
means that our whole business
model needs a complete overhaul...
for me it's time to get rid of some serious deadweight, even if it
means selling them below what you believe their market value is just to simply right this ship and change the stagnant culture that currently exists... this
means saying goodbye to Wiltshire, Elneny, Carzola, Walcott and Ramsey... everyone, minus Elneny, have spent just as much time on the training table as on the field of play, which would be manageable if they weren't so inconsistent from a performance standpoint (excluding Carzola, who is like the recent version of Rosicky — too bad, both will be deeply missed)... in their places we need to bring in some proven performers with no history of injuries... up front, although I do like the possibilities that a player like Lacazette presents, the fact that we had to wait so many years to acquire some true quality at the striker position falls once again squarely at the feet of Wenger... this issue highlights the ultimate scam being perpetrated by this club since the arrival of Kroenke: pretend your a small market club when it comes to making purchases but milk your fans like a big market club when it comes to ticket prices and merchandising... I believe the reason why Wenger hasn't pursued someone of Henry's quality, minus a fairly inexpensive RVP, was that he knew that they would demand players of a similar ilk to be brought on board and that wasn't possible when the business
model was that of a «selling» club... does it really make sense that we could only make a cheeky bid
for Suarez, or that we couldn't get Higuain over the line when he was being offered up
for half the price he eventually went to Juve
for, or that we've only paid any interest to strikers who were clearly not going to press their current teams to let them go to Arsenal like Benzema or Cavani... just part of the facade that finally came crashing down when Sanchez finally called their bluff... the fact remains that no one wants to win more than Sanchez, including Wenger, and although I don't agree with everything that he has done off the field, I would much rather have Alexis front and center than a manager who has clearly bought into the Kroenke
model in large part due to the fact that his enormous ego suggests that only he could accomplish great things without breaking the bank... unfortunately that isn't possible anymore as the game has changed quite dramatically in the last 15 years, which has left a largely complacent and complicit Wenger on the outside looking in... so don't blame those players who demanded more and were left wanting... don't blame those fans who have tried desperately to raise awareness
for several years when cracks began to appear... place the blame at the feet of those who were well aware all along of the potential pitfalls of just such a plan but continued to follow it even when it was no longer a financial necessity, like it ever really was...
That
means current climate
models for the Arctic can not accurately project the region's
future.
But Young is concerned that the
model's flexibility
means it won't make specific enough predictions
for future work to test it.
The biggest concern: that the Accelerated Climate
Modeling for Energy (ACME) project,
meant to forecast local impacts of climate change and to be used on DOE's
future exascale supercomputers, would dilute resources from the Community Earth System
Model (CESM).
«But [searching
for such flaws] is just a short - term fix because more powerful hardware and larger data
for training
means that
future AI
models will be able to capture all these properties and be truly indistinguishable from human - authored content,» Zhao says.
This technique promises an effective
means for modeling and removal of such systematic effects to the accuracy required by
future experiments to see direct evidence of the universe's putative acceleration.
«By
means of basic research on
model organisms, we are trying to understand human genome instability to identify elements, which, in the
future, might be able to be explored as targets of new anti-tumour medicines,» explains the researcher responsible
for the project and director of Cabimer, Andrés Aguilera.
What this
means for the
future is difficult to predict: rainfall is projected to increase, as is temperature, both of which lead to more methane emissions, but some
models predict a drying out of soils which would reduce said emissions... I guess we'll find out.
The kinder, gentler
model from the Hadley Centre
for Climate Prediction and Research in the United Kingdom estimated a wetter, warmer
future: Rainfall may increase 20 percent to 25 percent,
mean annual temperatures could increase 2 degrees Fahrenheit by 2030 and 4 degrees by 2100.
For large animals, like hippo and buffalo, their sensitivity to change — especially with predictions of more frequent and prolonged drought —
means they don't do well in any of the
future scenarios
modelled by the park's scientific teams.
There is no single «right»
future model for colleges to follow but the success of any one approach will be in the «hard yards» of preparation, planning and final implementation.Bringing institutions together and by association, their systems does not necessarily
mean that everything has to be integrated and harmonised unless there are benefits in doing so.
A leader and active member in many student groups while at the Ed School, including FIERCE (
Future Indigenous Educators Resisting Colonial Education) and the HGSE Rural Educators Alliance, Barraza, as noted by a peer who nominated her
for the Intellectual Contribution Award, «never shied away from difficult conversations with peers and professors and she
modeled what it
means to stand up
for what one believes in.»
What Elimination Of AmeriCorps Could
Mean For One New Bedford School (WBUR) Professor Paul Reville weighs in on Nativity Prep's model and what the Trump administration's budget cuts might mean for the future of these types of schoo
For One New Bedford School (WBUR) Professor Paul Reville weighs in on Nativity Prep's
model and what the Trump administration's budget cuts might
mean for the future of these types of schoo
for the
future of these types of schools.
Even if you don't go with a certified
model, newer used cars will probably have fewer miles on them,
meaning you will be able to keep using the vehicle
for longer in the
future.
Unfortunately, unfavorable numbers on spreadsheets
mean the
future may not be long
for some of Nissan's more interesting but less popular
models.
That
means the only version of the R8 that will be available
for the foreseeable
future will be the V10
model.
While each generated some interest from publishers and consumers, it wasn't until the July 18 launch of Kindle Unlimited, Amazon's e-book subscription service, that pundits and media outlets began parsing what these new business
models mean for the
future of books.
Some who use the PS3 as an alternative OS machine may have been worried at the Slim's drop of OtherOS support
meant that
future firmware updates to the previous PS3
models would also drop support
for OtherOS, but another representative qualms those fears:
I think with the mental muscle of this group, we could (by that, I
mean you all) come up with a clever solution that serves as a
model for the
future.»
I've posted here regularly about the implications of
mean reversion in elevated profit margins (see,
for example, The Temptation To Abandon Proven Models In Speculative and Fearful Markets: Why This Time Isn't Different, What Record Corporate Profit Margins Imply For Future Profitability and The Stock Market, Warren Buffett, Jeremy Grantham, and John Hussman on Profit, GDP and Competitio
for example, The Temptation To Abandon Proven
Models In Speculative and Fearful Markets: Why This Time Isn't Different, What Record Corporate Profit Margins Imply
For Future Profitability and The Stock Market, Warren Buffett, Jeremy Grantham, and John Hussman on Profit, GDP and Competitio
For Future Profitability and The Stock Market, Warren Buffett, Jeremy Grantham, and John Hussman on Profit, GDP and Competition).
What this
means for the
future is difficult to predict: rainfall is projected to increase, as is temperature, both of which lead to more methane emissions, but some
models predict a drying out of soils which would reduce said emissions... I guess we'll find out.
We already know that (regional) monsoon variability on the scales
for sub-seasonal to interannual are higher than the projected
model trends of
future mean monsoon rainfall (I've just seen that Kevin has mentioned this also).
That's a standard bit of economic
modeling prestidigitation,
meant to account
for the fact that people value present goods (or harms) more highly than
future ones.
Figure 6: Historical human - caused global
mean temperature change and
future changes
for the six illustrative SRES scenarios using a simple climate
model.
For example, using part of the proceeds from auctioning allowances in the EU ETS could generate additional means to invest in LULUCF activities both inside and outside the EU, and may provide a model for future expansi
For example, using part of the proceeds from auctioning allowances in the EU ETS could generate additional
means to invest in LULUCF activities both inside and outside the EU, and may provide a
model for future expansi
for future expansion.
Although there is as yet no convincing evidence in the observed record of changes in tropical cyclone behaviour, a synthesis of the recent
model results indicates that,
for the
future warmer climate, tropical cyclones will show increased peak wind speed and increased
mean and peak precipitation intensities.
If the
model is accurate enough, then the
model run with the realization of the stochastic process that most matches the
future record ought to be a reasonably accurate
model for the evolution the
mean global temperature.
Using data without a safety margin, such as
mean values
for a given turbine
model, measurements from a single turbine, or «best guess»
for future turbines gives in principle a probability of 50 per cent that the actual erected turbines will emit more noise than assumed and that noise limits will be exceeded.»
Mora et al analyzed past and
future (
modeled) climate states, determining
for key places and environments when
future mean temperatures began to continuously exceed historical precedents.
By
modeling the observed changes in drought recovery times with «business as usual» circumstances
for future conditions,
meaning assuming greenhouse gas emission trends continued as they have, the researchers were able to predict the
future recovery times of droughts.
The consequences
for models» predictions of the
future temperature can be seen in Figure 4, which shows that the mesoscale
model's projections of
mean maximum summertime temperatures over the eastern US
for July 2085 soar into the 95 - 110 °F range, while the corresponding predictions
for the GCM range between 75 - 95 °F.
In contrast, the revised paradigm of anthropogenic impacts on seawater pH accommodates the full range of realized and
future trends in pH of both open - ocean and coastal ecosystems and provides an improved framework to understand and
model the dynamic pH environment of coastal ecosystems, with observed daily fluctuations often exceeding the range of
mean pH values estimated
for the open ocean as a consequence of OA during the twenty - first century by GCMs (Price et al. 2012; Tables 1 and 2).
> Scientists probably did not adequately convey to the public that their projections
for future warming are based on
models that account only
for the so - called «forced response» in global
mean surface temperatures — that is, the change caused by greenhouse - gas emissions.
Various approaches to improve the precision of multi-model projections have been explored, but there is still no agreed strategy
for weighting the projections from different
models based on their historical performance so that there is no direct
means of translating quantitative measures of past performance into confident statements about fidelity of
future climate projections.
As we still don't know how nature put us in ice ages (yes we have the overall picture, but not the details
for a
model) or get us out again, and what other effects there are from altered atmospheric chemistry we really do not know how the
mean of the chaotic process might change in the
future.
«In our
models, the Indian Ocean shows very clear and dramatic warming into the
future, which
means more and more drought
for southern Africa,» said Dr. James W. Hurrell, author of a recent study by the US - based National Center
for Atmospheric Research.
The quasi-periodic nature of the
model's AMO suggests that in the absence of external forcings at least, there is some predictability of the THC, AMO and global and Northern Hemisphere
mean temperatures
for several decades into the
future.
This week, we look at what happens when utility companies decide to institute an Uber-esque surge pricing
model, why Facebook is getting into the real estate game, and what Amazon Prime's new student loan offering
means for the
future of student loan debt, as well as the next season of The Man in the High Castle (probably nothing).
Moreover, removing the headphone jack
means that
future iPhones would be easier to waterproof, and that's something else Apple is reportedly working on
for future models.
This didn't break the experience by any
means, but it's something that we wish Meizu will consider
for future models.
That obviously doesn't
mean you'll be able to run Android on an existing or
future iPhone X
model, but Google wants to be prepared
for the increasingly likely event that the notch will become the new normal.
When it was launched as the Fisker Karma, this car was in many ways a rival to the Tesla
Model S. Like the
Model S, it was
meant to make green technology exciting, and to serve as the springboard
for future mass - market
models.